Do clinical criteria reflect pathologic complete response in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy?
Clinical complete response (cCR) in rectal cancer is being evaluated as a tool to identify patients who would not require surgery in the curative management of rectal cancer. Our study reviews mucosal changes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer in patients treated at our center.
Pathology reports were retrieved for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) or high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT). The macroscopic appearance of the specimen was compared with pathologic staging.
This study included 282 patients: 88 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT and 194 patients underwent HDRBT; all patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). There were 160 male and 122 female patients with a median age of 65 years (range 29–87). The median time between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 50 and 58 days. Sixty patients (21.2%) were staged as ypT0N0, 21.2% had a pathologic complete response (pCR), and only 3.2% had a cCR. Of the 67 patients with initial involvement of the circumferential radial margin (CRM), 44 converted to pathologic CRM−. Two hundred seventy-three patients (96.8%) had mucosal abnormalities. Of the 222 patients with residual tumor, 70 patients had no macroscopic tumor visualized but an ulcer in its place.
Most patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer have residual mucosal abnormalities which preclude to a cCR as per published criteria from Brazil. Further studies are required to optimize clinical evaluation and MRI imaging in selected patients.
KeywordsPathologic response High-dose rate brachytherapy Clinical complete response
Aurelie Garant M.D., Livia Florianova M.D. M.Sc., Adrian Gologan M.D., Alan Spatz M.D. Ph.D., Julio Faria M.D., Nancy Morin M.D., Carol-Ann Vasilevsky M.D., and Te Vuong M.D. have all provided substantial contributions to the conception work, assisted in writing the work and approving the final version, and agreed to be accountable for the accuracy and integrity of all aspects of the work.
- 3.Maas M, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Lammering G, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SME, van Dam RM, Jansen RLH, Sosef M, Leijtens JWA, Hulsewé KWE, Buijsen J, Beets GL (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(35):4633–4640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J (2010) Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 53(12):1692–1698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Nahas SC, Rizkallah Nahas CS, Sparapan Marques CF, Ribeiro U Jr, Cotti GC, Imperiale AR, Capareli FC, Chih Chen AT, Hoff PM, Cecconello I (2016) Pathologic complete response in rectal cancer: can we detect it? Lessons learned from a proposed randomized trial of watch-and-wait treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59(4):255–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Maas M, Lambregts DMJ, Nelemans PJ, Heijnen LA, Martens MH, Leijtens JWA, Sosef M, Hulsewé KWE, Hoff C, Breukink SO, Stassen L, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL (2015) Assessment of clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer with digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI: selection for organ-saving treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 22(12):3873–3880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L, da Luz Moreira A, Geisler D, Dietz DW, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Kalady MF (2011) Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer decreases distant recurrence and could eradicate local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 18(6):1590–1598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Smith JJ et al (2015) Organ preservation in rectal adenocarcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management. BMC Cancer 15:767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, Marcet JE, Cataldo PA, Varma MG, Kumar AS, Oommen S, Coutsoftides T, Hunt SR, Stamos MJ, Ternent CA, Herzig DO, Fichera A, Polite BN, Dietz DW, Patil S, Avila K, Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium (2015) Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16(8):957–966CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Smith JJ, Chow OS, Eaton A, Widmar M, Nash GM, Temple LKF, Guillem JG, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, Cercek A, Saltz L, Gollub MJ, Gonen M, Garcia-Aguilar J, Paty P (2015) Organ preservation in patients with rectal cancer with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol 33:509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, Gollins S, Maw A, Myint AS, Rooney PS, Susnerwala S, Blower A, Saunders MP, Wilson MS, Scott N, O'Dwyer ST (2016) Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol 17(2):174–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar