Skip to main content
Log in

Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The incidence of incisional hernia (IH) at ileostomy closure site has not been sufficiently evaluated. Temporary loop ileostomy is routinely used in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The goal of this study was to compare the IH rates of standard suture skin closure and purse-string skin closure techniques.

Patients and methods

Patients undergoing ileostomy reversal and follow-up CT scan at the University Hospital Frankfurt between January 2009 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed regarding IH and associated risk factors. Patients received either direct stitch skin closure (group DC) or purse-string skin closure (group PS).

Results

In total, 111 patients underwent ileostomy reversal in the aforementioned period. In 88 patients, a CT scan was performed 12–24 months after ileostomy reversal for cancer follow-up. Median follow-up was 12 months. Median time interval between ileostoma formation and closure was 12 (± 4 SD) weeks. In 19 of 88 patients (21.5%), an IH was detected. The incidence of IH detected by CT scan was significantly lower in the PS group (n = 7, 12.9%) compared to the DC group (n = 12, 35.2%, p = 0.017).

Conclusions

This retrospective study shows an advantage of the purse-string skin closure technique in ileostomy reversals. The use of this technique for skin closure following ileostomy reversals is recommended to reduce the IH rates. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enker WE (1999) Mesorectal excision (TME) in the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Surg Investig 1(3):253–255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwiatt M, Kawata M (2013) Avoidance and management of stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg Thieme Medical Publishers 26(2):112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S, Smith E, Nepogodiev D, Janjua U (2012) A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas. Surgeon Elsevier 10(6):321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Keersmaecker G, Beckers R, Heindryckx E, Kyle-Leinhase I, Pletinckx P, Claeys D et al (2016) Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after reversal of a temporary diverting ileostomy following rectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scans. Hernia 20(2):271–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu DSH, Banham E, Yellapu S (2013) Prophylactic mesh reinforcement reduces stomal site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure. World J Surg 37(9):2039–2045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee A (1997) Pursestring skin closure after stoma reversal. Dis Colon Rectum 40(8):993–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Habbe N, Hannes S, Liese J, Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Strey C (2014) The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates—a single high-volume centre experience. Int J Color Dis 29(6):709–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mirbagheri N, Dark J, Skinner S (2013) Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates. Tech Coloproctol 17(2):215–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD (2005) Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg 201(5):759–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K, Collaborative WMR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg 36(5):973–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia Society (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guzman-Valdivia G (2008) Incisional hernia at the site of a stoma. Hernia 12(5):471–474. 

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W, Aslan A, Aktan AO (2008) Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Hernia 12(4):401–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schreinemacher MHF, Vijgen GHEJ, Dagnelie PC, Bloemen JG, Huizinga BF, Bouvy ND (2011) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds: a cohort study. Arch Surg 146(1):94–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Woeste.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juratli, M.A., Nour-Eldin, NE.A., Ackermann, H. et al. Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 33, 973–977 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-2986-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-2986-x

Keywords

Navigation