Abstract
Purpose
Reorganisation of cancer services in the UK and across Europe has led to elective surgery for colon cancer being increasingly, but not exclusively, delivered by specialist colorectal surgeons. This study examines survival after elective colon cancer surgery performed by specialist compared to non-specialist surgeons.
Method
Patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer in 16 hospitals between 2001 and 2004 were identified from a prospectively maintained regional audit database. Post-operative mortality (<30 days) and 5-year relative survival in those receiving surgery under the care of a specialist or non-specialist surgeon were compared.
Results
A total of 1,856 patients were included, of which, 1,367 (73.7 %) were treated by a specialist and 489 (26.4 %) by a non-specialist surgeon. Those treated by a specialist were more likely to be deprived, undergo surgery in a high volume unit and have higher lymph node yields than those treated by a non-specialist. Post-operative mortality was lower (4.5 versus 7.0 %; P = 0.032) and 5-year relative survival was higher (72.2 versus 65.6 %; P = 0.012) among those treated by a specialist surgeon. In multivariate analysis, surgery by non-specialists was independently associated with increased post-operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.69; P < 0.001) and poorer 5-year relative survival (adjusted relative excess risk (RER) 1.17; P = 0.045). After exclusion of post-operative deaths, there was no difference in long-term survival (adjusted RER 1.08; P = 0.505).
Conclusion
Five-year relative survival after elective colon cancer surgery was higher among those treated by specialist colorectal surgeons due to increased post-operative mortality among those treated by non-specialists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Oliphant R, Nicholson GA, Horgan PG, Molloy RG, McMillan DC, Morrison DS et al (2013) Contribution of surgical specialization to improved colorectal cancer survival. Br J Surg 100(10):1388–1395
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2011. (SIGN publication no. 126)
Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH ( 2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3
Dorrance HR, Docherty GM, O’Dwyer PJ (2000) Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43(4):492–498
Borowski DW, Kelly SB, Bradburn DM, Wilson RG, Gunn A, Ratcliffe AA et al (2007) Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 94:880–889
Porter G, Soskolne C, Yakimets W, Newman S (1998) Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 227(2):157–167
Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Reed JF, Olenwine JA, Aronoff JS, Sherman D (1996) Variations in colon and rectal surgical mortality. Comparison of specialities with a state-legislated database. Dis Colon Rectum 39:129–135
Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE (1997) Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 84:657–663
Mella J, Biffin A, Radcliffe AG, Stamatakis JD, Steele RJC (1997) Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Br J Surg 84:1731–1736
Smith JA, King PM, Lane RH, Thompson MR (2003) Evidence of the effect of ‘specialization’ on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex. Br J Surg 90(5):583–592
McArdle CS, Hole DJ (2004) Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(5):610–617
Oliphant R, Nicholson GA, Horgan PG, Molloy RG, McMillan DC, Morrison DS et al (2013) Deprivation and colorectal cancer surgery: longer-term survival inequalities are due to differential postoperative mortality between socioeconomic groups. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2132–2139
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006. (Available at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/topics/statistics/SIMDaccessed February 2014)
Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) (2007) Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. London: ACPGBI (3rd Edition)
Gruen RL, Pitt V, Green S, Parkhill A, Campbell D, Jolley D (2009) The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA: Ca J Clinicians 59:192–211
Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 94:145–161
Burns EM, Bottle A, Almoudaris AM, Mamidanna R, Aylin P, Darzi A et al (2013) Hierarchical multilevel analysis of increased caseload volume and postoperative outcome after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1531–1538
Birkmeyer J, Siewers A, Finlayson E, Stukel T, Lucas F, Batista I et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med 346:1128–1137
Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS et al (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 230(3):404–411
Rabeneck L, Davila J, Thompson M, El-Serag H (2004) Surgical volume and long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer in the veterans affairs health-care system. Am J Gastro 99(4):668–675
Berrino F, Estève J, Coleman MP (1995) Basic issue in estimating and comparing the survival of cancer patients. In: Berrino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Estève J, editors. Survival of cancer patients in Europe. The EUROCARE Study. No 132 ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer p. 1-14
Hole DJ, McArdle CS (2002) Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 89(5):586–590
McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS (2003) The effect of deprivation and the systemic inflammatory response on outcome following curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 89:612–614
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the surgeons who participated, the West of Scotland Colorectal Cancer Managed Clinical Network advisory board who gave permission for audit data to be used in this study and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine for providing the life-tables used in the relative survival analysis.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interests.
Funding
No funding received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oliphant, R., Nicholson, G.A., Horgan, P.G. et al. The impact of surgical specialisation on survival following elective colon cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 1143–1150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1965-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1965-0