Skip to main content
Log in

One-stage repair of anorectal malformations in females with vestibular fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Females with recto-vestibular fistula (RVF) can be managed either by one-stage sagittal anorectoplasty (SARP) or by conventional multi-stage approach with colostomy followed by SARP. Our aim was to define which approach, one-stage or multi-stage, is safer and more beneficial.

Methods

Using a defined search strategy, two investigators identified all comparative studies on the mentioned procedures. The study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Data are mean ± SD.

Results

Of 649 titles/abstracts screened, 13 full-text articles were analyzed. Three studies were included (156 females). One-stage SARP was associated with increased risk of wound infection (24.3 ± 8.7%) compared to multi-stage approach (10.9 ± 2.5%; p < 0.01) and increased risk of wound dehiscence (16.2 ± 4.8% vs. 2.4 ± 1.1%, respectively; p < 0.01). The incidence of anorectal stenosis was higher following one-stage repair (33.3%) vs. multi-stage approach (10.7%; p < 0.05). No differences were found with regards to redo SARP in both groups (12.9 ± 7.3% vs. 4.8 ± 0.8%; p = ns). At follow-up, the prevalence of soiling and constipation were similar after one-stage (19.7 ± 10.3% and 29.5 ± 5.4%) and multi-stage repair (13.7 ± 8.9% and 28.7 ± 4.4%; p = ns).

Conclusions

In females with RVF, the SARP performed without protective colostomy increases the risk of postoperative complications. However, this one-stage approach seems not to be associated with reduced fecal continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levitt MA, Peña A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Peña A, Devries PA (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 17:796–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Okada A, Kamata S, Imura K et al (1992) Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for rectovestibular and anovestibular fistula. J Pediatr Surg 27:85–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A et al (2005) Preliminary report on the international conference for the development of standards for the treatment of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:1521–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta A, Agarwala S, Sreenivas V et al (2017) Primary definitive procedure versus conventional three-staged procedure for the management of low-type anorectal malformation in females: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 22:87–91

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Levitt MA, Reynolds M et al (2016) Pediatric imperforate anus surgery—medscape reference. http://www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/933524-overview

  7. Peña A, Migotto-Krieger M, Levitt MA (2006) Colostomy in anorectal malformations: a procedure with serious but preventable complications. J Pediatr Surg 41:748–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patwardhan N, Kiely EM, Drake DP et al (2001) Colostomy for anorectal anomalies: high incidence of complications. J Pediatr Surg 36:795–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 21:6:e1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (2018) http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/about.php?about=about

  11. Review Manager (RevMan) (2014) The nordic cochrane centre. The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 20:5:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA et al (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Menon P, Rao KL (2007) Primary anorectoplasty in females with common anorectal malformations without colostomy. J Pediatr Surg 42:1103–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gupta DK et al (2007) Single stage repair of anovestibular fistula in neonate. Pediatr Surg Int 23:737–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang C, Li L, Liu S et al (2015) The management of anorectal malformation with congenital vestibular fistula: a single-stage modified anterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 31:809–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Amanollahi O, Ketabchian S (2016) One-stage vs. three-stage repair in anorectal malformation with rectovestibular fistula. Afr J Paediatr Surg 13:20–25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Karakus SC, User IR, Akcaer V et al (2017) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in vestibular fistula: with or without colostomy. Pediatr Surg Int 33:755–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalifa M, Shreef K, Al Ekrashy MA et al (2017) One or two stages procedure for repair of rectovestibular fistula: which is safer? (A single institution experience). Afr J Paediatr Surg 14:27–31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Levitt MA, Peña A (2012) Anorectal malformations. In: Coran AG, Adzick NS, Krummel TM et al (eds) Pediatric surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1289–1309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wakhlu A, Pandey A, Prasad A et al (1996) Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations and perineal trauma in the female child. J Pediatr Surg 31:1236–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levitt MA, Peña A (2005) Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr 17:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Steeg HJ, Schmiedeke E, Bagolan P et al (2015) European consensus meeting of ARM-Net members concerning diagnosis and early management of newborns with anorectal malformations. Tech Coloproctol 19:181–185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Adreniran JO (2002) One-stage correction of imperforate anus and rectovestibular fistula in girls: preliminary results. J Pediatr Surg 37:E16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu G, Yuan J, Geng J et al (2004) The treatment of high and intermediate anorectal malformations: one stage or three procedures? J Pediatr Surg 39:1466–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peña A (1988) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: Results in the management of 332 cases of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 3:94–104

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wakhlu A, Kureel SN, Tandon RK et al (2009) Long-term results of anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for the treatment of vestibular fistula. J Pediatr Surg 44:1913–1919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar B, Kandpal DK, Sharma SB et al (2008) Single-stage repair of vestibular and perineal fistulae without colostomy. J Pediatr Surg 43:1848–1852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Elsaied A, Aly K, Thabet W et al (2013) Two-stage repair of low anorectal malformations in girls: is it truly a setback? Ann Pediatr Surg 9:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chandramouli B, Srinivasan K, Jagdish S et al (2004) Morbidity and mortality of colostomy and its closure in children. J Pediatr Surg 39:596–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuijper CF, Aronson DC 2010 Anterior or posterior sagittal anorectoplasty without colostomy for low-type anorectal malformation: how to get a better outcome? J Pediatr Surg 45:1505–1508

  33. Short SS, Bucher BT, Barnhart DC et al (2018) Single-stage repair of rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulae can be safely delayed beyond the neonatal period. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.048 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmiedeke E, Zwink N, Schwarzer N et al (2012) Unexpected results of a nationwide, treatment-independent assessment of fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 28:825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Lauriti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no potential conflicts of interest for this study.

Ethical approval

Not applicable, since the study was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Informed consent

Not applicable, since the study was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lauriti, G., Di Renzo, D., Lelli Chiesa, P. et al. One-stage repair of anorectal malformations in females with vestibular fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 35, 77–85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4378-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4378-2

Keywords

Navigation