Advertisement

Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 641–645 | Cite as

Surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenal injuries in children

  • Micah G. Katz
  • Stephen J. Fenton
  • Kathryn W. Russell
  • Eric R. Scaife
  • Scott S. Short
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To examine surgical outcomes of children with pancreaticoduodenal injuries at a Quaternary Level I pediatric trauma center.

Methods

We queried a prospectively maintained trauma database of a level one pediatric trauma center for all cases of pancreatic and/or duodenal injury from 2002 to 2017. Analysis was conducted using JMP 13.1.0.

Results

170 children presented with pancreatic and/or duodenal injury. 13 (7.7%) suffered a combined injury and this group forms the basis for this report with mean ISS of 22.8 (± 15.1), RTS2 of 6.4(± 2.1), and median age of 6.6 (1.3–13.5) years. Child abuse (31%) and bicycle injuries (23%) were the most common mechanisms. 8/13 (61.5%) required operative intervention. Higher AAST pancreatic and duodenal injury grade (2.9 vs. 1.2, p = 0.05 and 3.6 vs. 1.4, p = < 0.01), lower RTS2 (7.84 vs. 5.49, p < 0.01), and lower GCS (9.6 vs. 15, p = 0.03) predicted operative intervention. 6/8 (75%) undergoing surgery survived to discharge with only (2/6) survivors suffering postoperative complications. Both mortalities were secondary to severe traumatic brain injury.

Conclusion

Surgical management of complex pancreaticoduodenal injury is an uncommon traumatic event that is associated with high injury severity, but survival occurs in most scenarios.

Keywords

Pancreatic trauma Duodenal trauma Pancreaticoduodenal trauma Trauma Whipple 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    O’Reilly DA, Bouamra O, Kausar A, Malde DJ, Dickson EJ, Lecky F (2015) The epidemiology of and outcome from pancreatoduodenal trauma in the UK, 1989–2013. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(2):125–130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonacci N, Di Saverio S, Ciaroni V, Biscardi A, Giugni A, Cancellieri F et al (2011) Prognosis and treatment of pancreaticoduodenal traumatic injuries: which factors are predictors of outcome? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(2):195–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feliciano DV, Martin TD, Cruse PA, Graham JM, Burch JM, Mattox KL et al (1987) Management of combined pancreatoduodenal injuries. Ann Surg 205(6):673–680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krige JE, Kotze UK, Setshedi M, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH (2016) Surgical Management and Outcomes of Combined Pancreaticoduodenal Injuries: analysis of 75 Consecutive Cases. J Am Coll Surg 222(5):737–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trauma EAftSo (2017) EAST practice management guidelines. https://www.east.org/education/practice-management-guidelines. Accessed 7 Oct 2017
  6. 6.
    Clendenon JN, Meyers RL, Nance ML, Scaife ER (2004) Management of duodenal injuries in children. J Pediatr Surg 39(6):964–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krige JEJ, Kotze UK, Setshedi M, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH (2017) Management of pancreatic injuries during damage control surgery: an observational outcomes analysis of 79 patients treated at an academic Level 1 trauma centre. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43(3):411–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krige JE, Navsaria PH, Nicol AJ (2016) Damage control laparotomy and delayed pancreatoduodenectomy for complex combined pancreatoduodenal and venous injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42(2):225–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carter KW, Moulton SL (2016) Pediatric abdominal injury patterns caused by “falls”: A comparison between nonaccidental and accidental trauma. J Pediatr Surg 51(2):326–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wood J, Rubin DM, Nance ML, Christian CW (2005) Distinguishing inflicted versus accidental abdominal injuries in young children. J Trauma 59(5):1203–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaines BA, Shultz BS, Morrison K, Ford HR (2004) Duodenal injuries in children: beware of child abuse. J Pediatr Surg 39(4):600–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berkowitz CD (2017) Physical abuse of children. N Engl J Med 377(4):399–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Wilden GM, Yeh D, Hwabejire JO, Klein EN, Fagenholz PJ, King DR et al (2014) Trauma Whipple: do or don’t after severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries? An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). World J Surg 38(2):335–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micah G. Katz
    • 1
  • Stephen J. Fenton
    • 1
  • Kathryn W. Russell
    • 1
  • Eric R. Scaife
    • 1
  • Scott S. Short
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of SurgeryPrimary Children’s Hospital, University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations