Abstract
Purpose
To demonstrate the outcome of external lengthening for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) at our hospitals.
Methods
Five patients with LGEA underwent external lengthening between 2010 and 2014 (group A), and 11 patients with LGEA underwent other lengthening techniques between 1990 and 2011 (group B). We compared the procedure and outcome between these two groups.
Results
The mean birth weight was 2001 g in group A and 2485 g in group B (p = 0.06). The mean age at esophageal reconstruction was 28 days in group A and 227 days in group B (p = 0.03). Although primary esophageal anastomosis without myotomy was feasible in all patients in group A, a myotomy was needed for primary esophageal anastomosis in half of the patients in group B. Anastomotic leakage occurred in none in group A and in six patients in group B (p = 0.03). The mean age at the establishment of full oral feeding was 76 days in group A and 686 days in group B (p = 0.009).
Conclusion
External traction for LGEA can effectively lengthen the esophagus to enable primary anastomosis at an earlier age. This may facilitate oral intake.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Foker JE, Linden BC, Boyle EM et al (1997) Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 226:533–543
AL-Qahtani A, Yazbeck S, Rosen N et al (2003) Lengthening technique for long gap esophageal atresia and early anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 38:737–739
Lopes MF, Reis A, Coutinho S et al (2004) Very long esophageal atresia successfully treated by esophageal lengthening using external traction sutures. J Pediatr Surg 39:1286–1287
Hadidi AT, Hosie S, Waag KL et al (2007) Long gap esophageal atresia: lengthening technique and primary anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 42:1659–1662
Skarsgard ED (2004) Dynamic esophageal lengthening for long gap esophageal atresia: experience with two cases. J Pediatr Surg 39:1712–1714
Nasr A, Langer JC (2013) Mechanical traction techniques for long-gap esophageal atresia: a critical appraisal. Eur J Pediatr Surg 23:191–197
Mochizuki K, Obatake M, Taura Y et al (2012) A modified Foker’s technique for long gap esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 28:851–854
Abraham MK, Sudarsanan B, Viswanath N et al (2013) A safer way of suturing in Foker’s technique. J Pediatr Surg 48:1819–1821
Tanaka Y, Uchida H, Kawashima H et al (2013) Successful two-stage thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using simple internal traction and delayed primary anastomosis in a neonate: report of a case. Surg Today 43:906–909
Singh A, Bajpai M, Sharma N et al (2014) Experience with Livaditis circular myotomy in management of long gap TEF. Afr J Pediatr Surg 11:35–38
van der Zee DC, Gallo G, Tytgat SH (2015) Thoracoscopic traction technique in long gap esophageal atresia: entering a new era. Surg Endosc (Epub ahead of print)
Thakkar HS, Cooney J, Kumar N et al (2014) Measured gap length and outcomes in oesophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 49:1343–1346
Ortiz R, Galan AS, Martinez L et al (2015) Tertiary surgery for complicated repair of esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 25:20–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mochizuki, K., Shinkai, M., Take, H. et al. Impact of an external lengthening procedure on the outcome of long-gap esophageal atresia at our hospitals. Pediatr Surg Int 31, 937–942 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3772-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3772-2