Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Shunt independence in paediatric hydrocephalus: our 16-year experience and review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Shunt independence remains a matter of debate for neurosurgeons, and little information on this subject is available in the literature. The aims of the study were to analyse the incidence of shunt removal in a series of paediatric patients and to describe our experience with attempts at shunt removal.

Methods

Thirty of 212 paediatric patients shunted between 2000 and 2016 at our institution were studied for shunt independence. Variables related to hydrocephalus aetiology, shunt complications, independence trial peculiarities and follow-up were recorded and a descriptive analysis of the data was performed.

Results

Two patients (0.94%) refused to be included in a shunt independence trial and were analysed separately. In the other 28 patients, 29 shunt independence trials were performed, of which 19 (65.52%) were successful, giving a global rate of shunt independence of 8.96% (19/212) in our population. Secondary endoscopic third ventriculostomy was the most frequent type of independence trial and achieved the highest success rate (75%). Spontaneous independence was achieved in just 4/7 cases (57.14%). Planned removal of the shunt in overdrainage cases had a 50% success rate, with transient measures to control intracranial pressure frequently required.

Conclusions

Shunt independence trials should be considered for selected patients in a closely monitored setting. Secondary endoscopic third ventriculostomy at the time of shunt malfunction has the highest success rate whereas planned removal of the shunt in overdrainage is an invasive procedure with more likelihood of failure. Shunt independence should not be presumed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baskin JJ, Manwaring KH, Rekate HL (1998) Ventricular shunt removal: the ultimate treatment of the slit ventricle syndrome. J Neurosurg 88(3):478–484. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellotti A, Rapaná A, Iaccarino C, Schonauer M (2001) Intracranial pressure monitoring after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an effective method to manage the “adaptation period”. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 103:223–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chernov MF, Kamikawa S, Yamane F, Ishihara S, Hori T (2005) Neurofiberscope-guided management of slit-ventricle syndrome due to shunt placement. J Neurosurg 102(3 Suppl):260–267. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.102.3.0260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cinalli G, Salazar C, Mallucci C, Yada JZ, Zerah M, Sainte-Rose C (1998) The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of shunt malfunction. Neurosurgery 43(6):1323–1327 discussion 1327-9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cinalli G, Spennato P, Ruggiero C, Aliberti F, Zerah M, Trischitta V, Cianciulli E, Maggi G (2006) Intracranial pressure monitoring and lumbar puncture after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Neurosurgery 58:126–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein FJ, Hochwald GM, Wald A, Ransohoff J (1975) Avoidance of shunt dependency in hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl (35):71–77

  7. Iannelli A, Gea A, Di Rocco C (2005) CSF shunt removal in children with hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 147:503–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0494-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iglesias S, Ros B, Martín A, Carrasco A, Segura M, Delgado A, Rius F, Arráez MA (2016) Surgical outcome of the shunt: 15-year experience in a single institution. Childs Nerv Syst 32(12):2377–2385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3206-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kestle JR, Holubkov R, Douglas Cochrane D, Kulkarni AV, Limbrick DD Jr, Luerssen TG et al (2016) A new Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17:391–396. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.PEDS15253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S, Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group (2009) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155(2):254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.02.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oi S, Di Rocco C (2006) Proposal of “evolution theory in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics” and minor pathway hydrocephalus in developing immature brain. Childs Nerv Syst 22(7):662–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-0020-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozisik P, Roth J, Beni-Adani L, Constantini S (2011) Continuous spinal drain following endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a proposal to change the definition of failure. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1973–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1562-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rapaná A, Bellotti A, Iaccarino C, Pascale M, Schonauer M (2004) Intracranial pressure patterns after endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Preliminary experience. Acta Neurochir 146(12):1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-004-0377-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ros B, Romero L, Ibáñez G, Iglesias S, Rius F, Pérez S, Arráez MA (2012) Success criteria in pediatric neuroendoscopic procedures. Proposal for classification of results after 67 operations. Childs Nerv Syst 28(5):691–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1689-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scavarda D, Bednarek N, Litre F, Koch C, Lena G, Morville P, Rousseaux P (2003) Acquired aqueductal stenosis in preterm infants: an indication for neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 19(10–11):756–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0805-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Symss NP, Oi S (2013) Theories of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and hydrocephalus: historical trend. J Neurosurg Pediatrics 11:170–177. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.3.PEDS0934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinchon M, Rekate H, Kulkarni AV (2012) Pediatric hydrocephalus outcomes: a review. Fluid Barriers CNS 9(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-9-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Waqar M, Ellenbogen JR, Mallucci C (2018) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for shunt malfunction in children: a review. J Clin Neurosci 51:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Avenida de Carlos Haya s/n, 29010, Málaga, Spain

    Sara Iglesias, Bienvenido Ros, Guillermo Ibáñez, Andrea Delgado, Ángela Ros & Miguel Ángel Arráez

Authors
  1. Sara Iglesias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bienvenido Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guillermo Ibáñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ángela Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Miguel Ángel Arráez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Iglesias.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iglesias, S., Ros, B., Ibáñez, G. et al. Shunt independence in paediatric hydrocephalus: our 16-year experience and review. Childs Nerv Syst 35, 1547–1555 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04267-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04267-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation