Abstract
Purpose
Intraosseous vascular access is often used when vascular access is difficult. However, the use of this space for a receptacle for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion has been scantly considered.
Materials and methods
Six upper limbs of fresh frozen cadavers were used for this study. In the supine position, a small hole was drilled through the outer cortex of the proximal humerus and into the medullary cavity. A 16-gauge needle was placed into the hole in the humerus and 150 cc of saline infused. Next, the adjacent axillary vein and tributaries were dissected to observe dilation or the presence of the blue-colored saline. For part two of the study, shunt tubing was passed subcutaneously from a supraclavicular incision to the hole made in the humerus. Range of motion of the shoulder was then performed.
Results
On all sides, all 150 cc of fluid was easily infused into the humerus. No specimen was found to have leakage from the drill hole site or into the extravascular soft tissues. With dissection of the axillary vein and its tributaries, all sides were found to have engorgement of these vessels. No tension was placed on the distal shunt tubing with full range of motion of the shoulder.
Conclusion
Based on our study, the humerus is another option available to the neurosurgeon for CSF diversion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anson J (2014) Vascular access in resuscitation. Surv Anesthesiol 58(6):319. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000455295.73918.19
Canale D, Longo L (1990) Harvey Cushing and pediatric neurosurgery. Neurosurgery:602–610. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199010000-00017
Dubick M, Holcomb J (2000) A review of intraosseous vascular access: current status and military application. Mil Med 165(7):552–559. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10920658. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
García-González U, Cavalcanti D, Agrawal A, Gonzalez L, Wallace R, Spetzler R, Preul M (2009) The diploic venous system: surgical anatomy and neurosurgical implications. Neurosurg Focus 27(5):E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.8.focus09169
Goldstein H, Feldstein N, Anderson R (2015) Letter to the editor: ventriculoiliac shunt: a single case experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16(4):477–478. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.peds15192
Kovar J, Gillum L (2010) Alternate route: the humerus bone - a viable option for IO access. JEMS 35:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2510(10)70207-2
Lake C (1959) THE VENTRICULOMASTOID SHUNT. Laryngoscope 69(12):1469-1477. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-195912000-00001
LaRocco B, Wang H (2003) Intraosseous infusion. Prehospital Emergency Care 7(2):280–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120390936950
Leidel B, Kirchhoff C, Bogner V, Stegmaier J, Mutschler W, Kanz K, Braunstein V (2009) Is the intraosseous access route fast and efficacious compared to conventional central venous catheterization in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department? A prospective observational pilot study. Patient Saf Surg 3(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-24
Leidel B, Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Bogner V, Biberthaler P, Kanz K (2010) Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: a prospective, randomized study. Resuscitation 81(8):994–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.038
McCarthy G (2000) Does intraosseous have to mean intramedullary? Emerg Med J 17(6):432–a-432. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.6.432-a
McCarthy G, O'Donnell C, O'Brien M (2003) Successful intraosseous infusion in the critically ill patient does not require a medullary cavity. Resuscitation 56(2):183–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00348-9
Ming Woo P, Hung Pang P, Chan K, Ching Kwok J (2015) Ventriculosternal shunting for the management of hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 11:371–375. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000861
Nosik W (1950) Ventriculomastoidostomy. J Neurosurg 7(3):236–239. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1950.7.3.0236
Orlowski J, Julius C, Petras R, Porembka D, Gallagher J (1989) The safety of intraosseous infusions: risks of fat and bone marrow emboli to the lungs. Ann Emerg Med 18(10):1062–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80932-1
Pasley J, Miller C, DuBose J, Shackelford S, Fang R, Boswell K et al (2015) Intraosseous infusion rates under high pressure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(2):295–299. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000516
Paxton J, Knuth T, Klausner H (2009) Proximal humerus intraosseous infusion: a preferred emergency venous access. J Trauma: Injury, Infection, And Critical Care 67(3):606–611. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3181b16f42
Pugh J, Tyler J, Churchill T, Fox R, Aronyk K (2007) Intraosseous infusion into the skull: potential application for the management of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 106(2):120–125. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2007.106.2.120
Rush S, D'Amore J, Boccio E (2014) A review of the evolution of intraosseous access in tactical settings and a feasibility study of a human cadaver model for a humeral head approach. Mil Med 179(8S):24–28. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-13-00484
Santos D, Carron P, Yersin B, Pasquier M (2013) EZ-IO® intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: a prospective study and review of the literature. Resuscitation 84(4):440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.006
Susak L, Macnab A, Christenson J, Peng J, Horwood B, Johnson D et al (2000) Early report on emergency sternal intraosseous infusion in adults. Prehospital Disaster Med 15(S2):S106. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00032374
Svien H, Dodge H, Lake C (1952) Ventriculomastoid shunt in the management of obstruction to the aqueduct of sylvius in the adult: report of case. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 27:215–218. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14941860. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Tubbs R, Bauer D, Chambers M, Loukas M, Shoja M, Cohen-Gadol A (2011) A novel method for cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Neurosurgery 68(2):491–495. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e3181ffa21c
Tubbs R, Tubbs I, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol A (2015) Ventriculoiliac shunt: a cadaveric feasibility study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 15(3):310–312. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.peds14252
Von Hoff D, Kuhn J, Burris H, Miller L (2008) Does intraosseous equal intravenous? A pharmacokinetic study. Am J Emerg Med 26(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.024
Wagner K (1985) Intraosseous infusion: an alternative route of pediatric intravascular access. J Emerg Med 3(6):496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(85)90015-0
Warren D, Kissoon N, Sommerauer J, Rieder M (1993) Comparison of fluid infusion rates among peripheral intravenous and humerus, femur, malleolus, and tibial intraosseous sites in normovolemic and hypovolemic piglets. Ann Emerg Med 22(2):183–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80199-4
Welch K (1967) The secretion of cerebrospinal fluid by lamina epithelialis. Monogr Surg Sci 4:155–192. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4864686. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Whitenack S, Hausberger F (1971) Intravasation of fat from the bone marrow cavity. Am J Pathol 65:335–345. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5134888. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Kassem MW, Chern J, Loukas M, Tubbs RS (2017 Dec) Intramedullary placement of ventricular shunts: a review of using bone as a distal cerebrospinal absorption site in treating hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 33(12):2095–2098
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
As a cadaveric study, our institution does not require IRB approval. However, ethical considerations were in accord with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kassem, M.W., Ishak, B., Mehta, K. et al. Ventriculo-humeral shunt: a cadaveric feasibility study with application to treating hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 35, 1561–1564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04175-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04175-3