Child's Nervous System

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 925–932 | Cite as

Fatty filum terminale (FFT) as a secondary tethering element in children with closed spinal dysraphism

Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of FFT as an additional tethering element in children operated for closed spinal dysraphism, where FFT was not the primary tethering pathology.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 195 children (< 18 years of age) who underwent surgery for closed spinal dysraphism and did not have FFT as the primary diagnosis. All patients were operated during the period 2005–2017 by a single surgeon. The commonest diagnosis was a lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC, n = 81, 41.5%), followed by split cord malformations (SCM, types I and II, n = 61, 31.3%), dermal sinus (n = 28, 14.4%), and dermoid cyst (n = 10, 5.1%). Factors such as age and sex, presenting symptoms, intraoperative findings, and radiological presence of a FFT on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were documented, and the relationship between the primary diagnoses and presence of FFT was analyzed.

Results

FFT as a secondary finding was seen in 63 patients (32.3%). The mean age of the cohort was 54 months (4.5 years) and the sex distribution was relatively even (51.8% girls). The commonest symptom at presentation was a swelling in the back, followed by lower limb weakness. The mean duration of symptoms was nearly 30 months. FFT was seen on the MRI and confirmed intraoperatively in 55 patients (28.2%). There were 8 patients (4.1%) where a FFT was seen intraoperatively, but was not diagnosed on the preoperative MRI. In 16 patients, FFT was seen > 2 segments away from the primary tethering pathology, 8 of which mandated a second skin incision for sectioning of the FFT. Secondary FFT was most commonly associated with a SCM (types I and II combined) and was seen in 42.6% of those patients. It was least commonly associated with intradural dermoid cysts.

Conclusion

The presence of a secondary FFT should be considered and actively sought on preoperative thin-slice T1W axial MR images in the sacral region in all patients with spinal dysraphism. Even if a FFT is not seen on preoperative MR images, the filum should be explored and sectioned if it is in the vicinity of the primary surgical field, especially in patients with SCM.

Keywords

Filum terminale Spinal dysraphism Tethered cord Fatty filum Split cord 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Abel TJ, Chowdhary A, Gabikian P, Ellenbogen RG, Avellino AM (2006) Acquired Chiari malformation type I associated with a fatty terminal filum. J Neurosurg Pediatr 105(4):329–332.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2006.105.4.329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal A, Sampley S (2014) Spinal dysraphism: a challenge continued to be faced by neurosurgeons in developing countries. Asian J Neurosurg 9(2):68–71.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.136713 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ak H, Atalay T, Gülşen I (2014) The association of the epidermoid cyst of the filum terminale, intradural spinal lipoma, tethered cord, dermal sinus tract, and type I diastematomyelia in a child. World Neurosurg 82(6):e836–e837.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.08.040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar R, Garg P, Kalra SK, Mahapatra AK (2010) Management of multiple tethering in spinal dysraphism. Childs Nerv Syst 26(12):1743–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1148-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar R, Singh SN (2003) Spinal dysraphism: trends in northern India. Pediatr Neurosurg 38(3):133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000068819 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patnaik A, Mahapatra AK (2013) Complex forms of spinal dysraphism. Childs Nerv Syst 29(9):1527–1532.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2161-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barutcuoglu M, Selcuki M, Selcuki D, Umur S, Mete M, Gurgen SG, Umur (2015) Cutting filum terminale is very important in split cord malformation cases to achieve total release. Childs Nerv Syst 31(3):425–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2586-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James CC, Lassman LP (1970) Diastematomyelia and the tight filum terminale. J Neurol Sci 10(2):193–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(70)90019-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pang D (1992) Split cord malformation: part II: clinical syndrome. Neurosurgery 31(3):481–500.  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199209000-00011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bao N, Chen Z-H, Gu S, Chen QM, Jin HM, Shi CR (2007) Tight filum terminale syndrome in children: analysis based on positioning of the conus and absence or presence of lumbosacral lipoma. Childs Nerv Syst 23(10):1129–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0376-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bui CJ, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ (2007) Tethered cord syndrome in children: a review. Neurosurg Focus 23:E2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Vloo P, Monea AG, Sciot R, van Loon J, van Calenbergh F (2016) The filum terminale: a cadaver study of anatomy, histology, and elastic properties. World Neurosurg 90:565–573.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pinto FCG, Fontes RB, Leonhardt Mde C et al (2002) Anatomic study of the filum terminale and its correlations with the tethered cord syndrome. Neurosurgery 51:725–729; discussion 729– 30, 3.  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-200209000-00019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Filippidis AS, Kalani MY, Theodore N, Rekate HL (2010) Spinal cord traction, vascular compromise, hypoxia, and metabolic derangements in the pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome. Neurosurg Focus 29(1):E9.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1085 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hertzler DA, DePowell JJ, Stevenson CB, Mangano FT (2010) Tethered cord syndrome: a review of the literature from embryology to adult presentation. Neurosurg Focus 29(1):E1.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1079 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamada S, Zinke DE, Sanders D (1981) Pathophysiology of “tethered cord syndrome”. J Neurosurg 54(4):494–503.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1981.54.4.0494 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Selçuki M, Vatansever S, Inan S, Erdemli E, Bağdatoğlu C, Polat A (2003) Is a filum terminale with a normal appearance really normal? Childs Nerv Syst 19(1):3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-002-0665-1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Durdağ E, Börcek PB, Öcal Ö, Börcek AÖ, Emmez H, Baykaner MK (2015) Pathological evaluation of the filum terminale tissue after surgical excision. Childs Nerv Syst 31(5):759–763.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2627-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hansasuta A, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ (1999) Filum terminale fusion and dural sac termination: study in 27 cadavers. Pediatr Neurosurg 30(4):176–179.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000028790 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hendson G, Dunham C, Steinbok P (2016) Histopathology of the filum terminale in children with and without tethered cord syndrome with attention to the elastic tissue within the filum. Childs Nerv Syst 32(9):1683–1692.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3123-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jang HS, Cho KH, Chang H, Jin ZW, Rodriguez-Vazquez JF, Murakami G (2016) The filum terminale revisited: a histological study in human fetuses. Pediatr Neurosurg 51(1):9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000439284 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yundt KD, Park TS, Kaufman BA (1997) Normal diameter of filum terminale in children: in vivo measurement. Pediatr Neurosurg 27(5):257–259.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000121263 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M (1992) Split cord malformation: part I: a unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 31(3):451–480.  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199209000-00010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaddam SSK, Santhi V, Babu S, Chacko G, Baddukonda RA, Rajshekhar V (2012) Gross and microscopic study of the filum terminale: does the filum contain functional neural elements? J Neurosurg Pediatr 9(1):86–92.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.10.PEDS11102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar GSS, Rajshekhar V, Babu KS (2006) Intraoperative mapping of sacral nervous system (S2–4). Br J Neurosurg 20(6):396–402.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690601101481 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Legatt AD, Schroeder CE, Gill B, Goodrich JT (1992) Electrical stimulation and multichannel EMG recording for identification of functional neural tissue during cauda equina surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 8(4):185–189.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262842 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steinbok P, Kariyattil R, MacNeily AE (2007) Comparison of section of filum terminale and non-neurosurgical management for urinary incontinence in patients with normal conus position and possible occult tethered cord syndrome. Neurosurgery 61(3):550–555; discussion 555–556.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000290902.07943.E6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Drake JM (2006) Occult tethered cord syndrome: not an indication for surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 104(5):305–308.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2006.104.5.305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steinbok P, MacNeily AE, Hengel AR, Afshar K, Landgraf JM, Hader W, Pugh J (2016) Filum section for urinary incontinence in children with occult tethered cord syndrome: a randomized, controlled pilot study. J Urol 195(4):1183–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.082 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mahapatra AK, Gupta DK (2005) Split cord malformations: a clinical study of 254 patients and a proposal for a new clinical—imaging classification. J Neurosurg Pediatr 103(6):531–536.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.103.6.0531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borkar SA, Mahapatra AK (2012) Split cord malformations: a two years experience at AIIMS. Asian J Neurosurg 7(2):56–60.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.98643 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mahapatra AK (2011) Split cord malformation—a study of 300 cases at AIIMS 1990-2006. J Pediatr Neurosci 6(Suppl 1):S41–S45.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.85708 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sinha S, Agarwal D, Mahapatra AK (2006) Split cord malformations: an experience of 203 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 22(1):3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1145-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurological SciencesChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations