Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of a case

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The birth prevalence of Apert syndrome is estimated at 1:64,500 and accounts for about 4.5 % of all craniosynostosis with a male/female ratio equal to 1:1. It is associated to allelic mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene. Majority cases are sporadic. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis is based on the detection of abnormal cranial shape, midfacial hypoplasia and bilateral syndactyly of hands and feet, hypertelorism, and exorbitism. Other abnormalities includes central nervous system anomalies, congenital heart diseases, cleft palate, and urogenital diseases.

Case report

A 37-year-old Caucasian woman, gravida 2, para 1, was referred to our center of Prenatal Diagnosis for routine ultrasound at 21 weeks of gestation. We detected irregular head shape, dolicocephaly, prominent forehead, bilateral mild ventriculomegaly, suspicion of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, hypertelorism, and midfacial hypoplasia, with a depressed nasal bridge and syndactyly, prompting a suspicion for Apert syndrome. Magnetic resonance excluded agenesis of corpus callosum and confirmed bilateral mild ventriculomegaly. A follow-up ultrasound, performed at 23 weeks, confirmed the anomalies showed in the previous scan. An amniocentesis was performed. The results showed a normal male karyotype, while the molecular genetic test confirmed a mutation in FGFR2 gene. Fetus macroscopic analysis showed compatible features.

Conclusions

Our case underlines the complementary role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the early prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apert M (1906) De l’acrocéphalosyndactylie. Bull Mém Soc Med Hop Paris 23:1310–1313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen MM Jr, Kreiborg S (1992) New indirect method for estimating the birth prevalence of the Apert syndrome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21:107–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen MM Jr, Kreiborg S (1993) Visceral anomalies in the Apert syndrome. Am J Med Genet 45:758–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MM Jr, Kreiborg S, Lammer EJ, Cordero JF, Mastroiacovo P, Erickson JD, Roeper P, Martínez-Frías ML (1992) Birth prevalence study of the Apert syndrome. Am J Med Genet 42:655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tolarova MM, Harris JA, Ordway DE, Vargervik K (1997) Birth prevalence, mutation rate, sex ratio, parents’ age, and ethnicity in Apert syndrome. Am J Med Genet 72:394–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan L (1991) Clinical assessment and multispeciality management of Apert syndrome. Clin Plast Surg 18:217–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allanson JE (1986) Germinal mosaicism in Apert syndrome. Clin Genet 29:429–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilkie AO, Slaney SF, Oldridge M, Poole MD, Ashworth GJ, Hockley AD, Hayward RD, David DJ, Pulleyn LJ, Rutland P, Malcolm S, Winter RM, Reardon W (1995) Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome. Nat Genet 9:165–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkie AOM (1997) Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 6:1647–1656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park WJ, Theda C, Maestri NE, Meyers GA, Fryburg JS, Dufresne C, Cohen MM Jr, Jabs EW (1995) Analysis of phenotypic features and FGFR2 mutations in Apert syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 57:321–328

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Von Gernet S, Golla A, Ehrenfels Y, Schuffenhauer S, Fairley JD (2000) Genotype-phenotype analysis in Apert syndrome suggests opposite effects of the two recurrent mutations on syndactyly and outcome of craniofacial surgery. Clin Genet 57:137–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira JC, Carter SM, Bernstein PS, Jabs EW, Glickstein JS, Marion RW, Baergen RN, Gross SJ (1999) Second-trimester molecular prenatal diagnosis of sporadic Apert syndrome following suspicious ultrasound findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14:426–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Leon GA, De Leon G, Grover WD, Zaeri N, Alburger PD (1987) Agenesis of the corpus callosum and limbic malformation in Apert syndrome (type acrocephalosyndactyly). Arch Neurol 44:979–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen MM, Kreiborg S (1990) The central nervous system in the Apert syndrome. Am J Med Genet 35:36–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Renier D, Arnaud E, Cinalli G, Sebag G, Zerah M, Marchac D (1996) Prognosis for mental function in Apert’s syndrome. Neurosurgery 85:66–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yacubian-Fernandes A, Palhares A, Giglio A, Gabarra RC, Zanini S, Portela L, Plese JP (2004) Apert syndrome: analysis of associated brain malformations and conformational changes determined by surgical treatment. J Neuroradiol 31:116–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quintero-Rivera F, Robson CD, Reiss RE, Levine D, Benson CB, Mulliken JB, Kimonis VE (2006) Intracranial anomalies detected by imaging studies in 30 patients with Apert syndrome. Am J Med Genet 140:1337–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Quintero-Rivera F, Robson CD, Reiss RE, Levine D, Benson C, Mulliken JB, Kimonis VE (2006) Apert syndrome: what prenatal radiographic findings should prompt its consideration? Prenat Diagn 26:966–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pooh RK, Nakagawa Y, Pooh KH, Nakagawa Y, Nagamachi N (1999) Fetal craniofacial structure and intracranial morphology in a case of Apert syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:274–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Respondek-Liberska M, Smigiel R, Zielinski A, Sasiadek MM (2010) Progressive development of sonographic features in prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome—case report and literature review. Ginekol Pol 81(12):935–939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Au PK, Kwok YK, Leung KY, Tang LY, Tang MH, Lau ET (2011) Detection of the S252W mutation in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in fetal DNA from maternal plasma in a pregnancy affected by Apert syndrome. Prenat Diagn 31(2):218–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Breugem CC, Fitzpatrick DF, Verchere C (2008) Monozygotic twins with Apert syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 45:101–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber B, Schwabegger AH, Vodopiutz J, Janecke AR, Forstner R, Steiner H (2010) Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome with cloverleaf skull deformity using ultrasound, fetal magnetic resonance imaging and genetic analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 27:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boog G, Le Vaillant C, Winer N, David A, Quere MP, Nomballais MF (1999) Contribution of tridimensional sonography and magnetic resonance imaging to prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome at mid-trimester fetal. Diagn Ther 14:20–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Blaicher W, Prayer D, Bernaschek G (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the assessment of the fetal central nervous system. J Perinat Med 31(6):459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Skidmore DL, Pai AP, Toi A, Steele L, Chitayat D (2003) Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of two cases. Prenat Diagn 23(12):1009–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lam H, Lo TK, Lau E, Chin R, Tang L (2006) The use of 2- and 3-dimensional sonographic scans in the evaluation of cranial sutures: prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 25(11):1481–1484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. David AL, Turnbull C, Scott R, Freeman J, Bilardo CM, van Maarle M, Chitty LS (2007) Diagnosis of Apert syndrome in the second-trimester using 2D and 3D ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 27(7):629–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Athanasiadis AP, Zafrakas M, Polychronou P, Florentin-Arar L, Papasozomenou P, Norbury G, Bontis JN (2008) Apert syndrome: the current role of prenatal ultrasound and genetic analysis in diagnosis and counselling. Fetal Diagn Ther 24(4):495–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Manganaro L, Savelli S, Francioso A, Di Maurizio M, Coratella F, Vilella G, Noia G, Giancotti A, Tomei A, Fierro F, Ballesio L (2009) Role of fetal MRI in the diagnosis of cerebral ventriculomegaly assessed by ultrasonography. Radiol Med 114(7):1013–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Triulzi F, Manganaro L, Volpe P (2011) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, study, protocols and safety. Radiol Med 116(3):337–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Esser T, Rogalla P, Bamberg C, Kalache KD (2005) Application of the three-dimensional maximum mode in prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1743–1745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Faro C, Chaoui R, Wegrzyn P, Levaillant JM, Benoit B, Nicolaides KH (2006) Metopic sutures in fetuses with Apert syndrome from 22–27 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:28–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Giancotti.

Additional information

PECRAM Study Group members: Polimeni A., Pizzuti A., Cascone P., Silvestri A., Roggini M., Tarani L., Papoff P., Castori M., and Lenzi J. from “Sapienza” University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giancotti, A., D’Ambrosio, V., De Filippis, A. et al. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of a case. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 1445–1448 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2377-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2377-8

Keywords

Navigation