Advertisement

Heart and Vessels

, Volume 33, Issue 10, pp 1238–1244 | Cite as

Radiofrequency needle for transseptal puncture is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolism during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: propensity score-matched analysis

  • Michifumi Tokuda
  • Seigo Yamashita
  • Seiichiro Matsuo
  • Mika Kato
  • Hidenori Sato
  • Hirotsuna Oseto
  • Eri Okajima
  • Hidetsugu Ikewaki
  • Ryota Isogai
  • Kenichi Tokutake
  • Kenichi Yokoyama
  • Ryohsuke Narui
  • Shin-ichi Tanigawa
  • Keiichi Inada
  • Michihiro Yoshimura
  • Teiichi Yamane
Original Article

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation requires transseptal puncture to access the left atrium. Recently, a radiofrequency (RF) needle was developed. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of MRI-confirmed acute cerebral embolism (ACE) during AF ablation procedures performed with RF needle versus mechanical needle transseptal puncture. This study consisted of 383 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF that required transseptal puncture with mechanical or radiofrequency transseptal needles. Of those, 232 propensity score-matched patients (116 with each needle type) were included in the analysis. All patients had cerebral MRI performed 1 or 2 days after the procedure. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Total procedure time was significantly shorter in Group RF than Group non-RF (167 ± 50 vs. 181 ± 52 min, P = 0.01). ACE was detected by MRI in 59 (25%) patients. All patients with ACE were asymptomatic. Incidence of ACE was lower in Group RF than Group non-RF (19 vs. 32%, P = 0.02). B-type natriuretic peptide level was higher in the patients with ACE as compared to those without ACE (65.2 ± 68.7 vs. 44.7 ± 55.1 pg/ml, P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, the use of RF needle and BNP level was related to the incidence of ACE (OR = 0.499, 95% CI 0.270–0.922, P = 0.03 and OR = 1.005, 95% CI 1.000–1.010, P = 0.03). Use of RF needle for transseptal puncture was associated with lower total procedure time and risk of ACE during catheter ablation of AF.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Catheter ablation Transseptal Radiofrequency needle Embolism 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hussein AA, Martin DO, Saliba W, Patel D, Karim S, Batal O, Banna M, Williams-Andrews M, Sherman M, Kanj M, Bhargava M, Dresing T, Callahan T, Tchou P, Di Biase L, Beheiry S, Lindsay B, Natale A, Wazni O (2009) Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic international normalized ratio: a safe and efficacious periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Heart Rhythm 6:1425–1429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deneke T, Shin DI, Balta O, Bünz K, Fassbender F, Mügge A, Anders H, Horlitz M, Päsler M, Karthikapallil S, Arentz T, Beyer D, Bansmann M (2011) Postablation asymptomatic cerebral lesions: long-term follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm 8:1705–1711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herrera Siklódy C, Deneke T, Hocini M, Lehrmann H, Shin DI, Miyazaki S, Henschke S, Fluegel P, Schiebeling-Römer J, Bansmann PM, Bourdias T, Dousset V, Haïssaguerre M, Arentz T (2011) Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:681–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwarz N, Kuniss M, Nedelmann M, Kaps M, Bachmann G, Neumann T, Pitschner HF, Gerriets T (2010) Neuropsychological decline after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 7:1761–1767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iwasawa J, Miyazaki S, Takagi T, Taniguchi H, Nakamura H, Hachiya H, Iesaka Y (2018) Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during left-sided catheter ablation with the use of different approaches—the potential microembolic risk of a transseptal approach. Europace 20:347–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsu JC, Badhwar N, Gerstenfeld EP, Lee RJ, Mandyam MC, Dewland TA, Imburgia KE, Hoffmayer KS, Vedantham V, Lee BK, Tseng ZH, Scheinman MM, Olgin JE, Marcus GM (2013) Randomized trial of conventional transseptal needle versus radiofrequency energy needle puncture for left atrial access (the TRAVERSE-LA study). J Am Heart Assoc 2:e000428PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tokuda M, Matsuo S, Isogai R, Uno G, Tokutake K, Yokoyama K, Kato M, Narui R, Tanigawa S, Yamashita S, Inada K, Yoshimura M, Yamane T (2016) Adenosine testing during cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis. Heart Rhythm 13:2128–2134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamane T, Date T, Kanzaki Y, Inada K, Matsuo S, Shibayama K, Miyanaga S, Miyazaki H, Sugimoto K, Mochizuki S (2007) Segmental pulmonary vein antrum isolation using the “large-size” lasso catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J 71:753–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsuo S, Yamane T, Date T, Inada K, Kanzaki Y, Tokuda M, Shibayama K, Miyanaga S, Miyazaki H, Sugimoto K, Mochizuki S (2007) Reduction of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation by eliminating ATP-induced transient venous re-conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 18:704–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamane T, Matsuo S, Date T, Lellouche N, Hioki M, Narui R, Ito K, Tanigawa S, Yamashita S, Tokuda M, Yoshida H, Inada K, Shibayama K, Miyanaga S, Miyazaki H, Abe K, Sugimoto K, Yoshimura M (2011) Repeated provocation of time- and ATP-induced early pulmonary vein reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation: eliminating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a single procedure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 4:601–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deneke T, Jais P, Scaglione M, Schmitt R, Di Biase L, Christopoulos G, Schade A, Mügge A, Bansmann M, Nentwich K, Müller P, Krug J, Roos M, Halbfass P, Natale A, Gaita F, Haines D (2015) Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26:455–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaita F, Leclercq JF, Schumacher B, Scaglione M, Toso E, Halimi F, Schade A, Froehner S, Ziegler V, Sergi D, Cesarani F, Blandino A (2011) Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22:961–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verma A, Debruyne P, Nardi S, Deneke T, DeGreef Y, Spitzer S, Balzer JO, Boersma L, Investigators ERACE (2013) Evaluation and reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism in ablation of atrial fibrillation, but high prevalence of chronic silent infarction: results of the evaluation of reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6:835–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feld GK, Tiongson J, Oshodi G (2011) Particle formation and risk of embolization during transseptal catheterization: comparison of standard transseptal needles and a new radiofrequency transseptal needle. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 30:31–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fromentin S, Sarrazin JF, Champagne J, Nault I, Philippon F, Molin F, Blier L, O’Hara G (2011) Prospective comparison between conventional transseptal puncture and transseptal needle puncture with radiofrequency energy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 31:237–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veldtman GR, Wilson GJ, Peirone A, Hartley A, Estrada M, Norgard G, Leung RK, Visram N, Benson LN (2005) Radiofrequency perforation and conventional needle percutaneous transseptal left heart access: pathological features. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65:556–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Medi C, Evered L, Silbert B, Teh A, Halloran K, Morton J, Kistler P, Kalman J (2013) Subtle post-procedural cognitive dysfunction after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:531–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D (2012) 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace 14:528–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martinek M, Sigmund E, Lemes C, Derndorfer M, Aichinger J, Winter S, Jauker W, Gschwendtner M, Nesser HJ, Pürerfellner H (2013) Asymptomatic cerebral lesions during pulmonary vein isolation under uninterrupted oral anticoagulation. Europace 15:325–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kowalski M, DeVille JB, Svinarich JT, Dan D, Wickliffe A, Kantipudi C, Foell JD, Filardo G, Holbrook R, Baker J, Baydoun H, Jenkins M, Chang-Sing P (2016) Using discrete event simulation to model the economic value of shorter procedure times on EP lab efficiency in the VALUE PVI study. J Invasive Cardiol 28:176–182PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michifumi Tokuda
    • 1
  • Seigo Yamashita
    • 1
  • Seiichiro Matsuo
    • 1
  • Mika Kato
    • 1
  • Hidenori Sato
    • 1
  • Hirotsuna Oseto
    • 1
  • Eri Okajima
    • 1
  • Hidetsugu Ikewaki
    • 1
  • Ryota Isogai
    • 1
  • Kenichi Tokutake
    • 1
  • Kenichi Yokoyama
    • 1
  • Ryohsuke Narui
    • 1
  • Shin-ichi Tanigawa
    • 1
  • Keiichi Inada
    • 1
  • Michihiro Yoshimura
    • 1
  • Teiichi Yamane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations