Comparison of the effects of linagliptin and voglibose on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a prospective, randomized, pilot study (EFFORT)
- 115 Downloads
Endothelial dysfunction contributes to poor cardiovascular prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD). The effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on endothelial function remains controversial. We sought to compare the effects of linagliptin and voglibose on endothelial function, as assessed by reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT). Sixteen patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and CAD were randomized 1:1 to linagliptin (5 mg, once-daily) or voglibose (0.9 mg, thrice-daily). The RH-PAT and laboratory parameters, including 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, were measured at baseline and 3 months. Linagliptin increased serum levels of active glucagon-like peptide-1 and high-molecular-weight adiponectin. Age-, sex-, and baseline-adjusted changes in logarithmic RH-PAT index (LnRHI) after 3 months were significant between groups (linagliptin, 0.135 ± 0.097; voglibose, − 0.124 ± 0.091; P = 0.047). In the linagliptin group, change in LnRHI was positively correlated with change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and negatively correlated with changes in both urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Furthermore, linagliptin treatment for 3 months reduced serum levels of both glucose and insulin at 2 h, relative to voglibose, in the age-, sex-, and baseline-adjusted model. Linagliptin improved endothelial function relative to voglibose, accompanied by amelioration of glycemic, renal, and cardiometabolic parameters, in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and CAD.
Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN 000029169 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000012442).
KeywordsEndothelial function Linagliptin Voglibose Type 2 diabetes mellitus Coronary artery disease
Authors thank Mikiko Kagiyama, Sae Katafuchi, and Aya Yamada for their excellent secretarial assistance.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
TK, AT, and HY have no financial interests to disclose related to this manuscript. JO has belonged to the research program faculty (chair course) sponsored by Fukuda Denshi. ST and MS have no financial interests to disclose related to this manuscript. TI has received honoraria from Mochida and Bayer; and scholarships from Abbott, KAATHU JAPAN, GOODMAN, CLINICO, Shionogi, St. Jude Medical, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Teijin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific Japan, and UNION TOOL. YO has no financial interests to disclose related to this manuscript. KN has received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Astellas; research funding from Bayer, Teijin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Asahi Kasei; and scholarships from Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon, Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
- 8.Nakamura K, Oe H, Kihara H, Shimada K, Fukuda S, Watanabe K, Takagi T, Yunoki K, Miyoshi T, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J, Ito H (2014) DPP-4 inhibitor and alpha-glucosidase inhibitor equally improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: EDGE study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 13:110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ayaori M, Iwakami N, Uto-Kondo H, Sato H, Sasaki M, Komatsu T, Iizuka M, Takiguchi S, Yakushiji E, Nakaya K, Yogo M, Ogura M, Takase B, Murakami T, Ikewaki K (2013) Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors attenuate endothelial function as evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilatation in type 2 diabetic patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2:e003277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Matsubara J, Sugiyama S, Akiyama E, Iwashita S, Kurokawa H, Ohba K, Maeda H, Fujisue K, Yamamoto E, Kaikita K, Hokimoto S, Jinnouchi H, Ogawa H (2013) Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, improves endothelial dysfunction in association with its anti-inflammatory effects in patients with coronary artery disease and uncontrolled diabetes. Circ J 77:1337–1344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Maruhashi T, Higashi Y, Kihara Y, Yamada H, Sata M, Ueda S, Odawara M, Terauchi Y, Dai K, Ohno J, Iida M, Sano H, Tomiyama H, Inoue T, Tanaka A, Murohara T, Node K, PROLOGUE Study Investigators (2016) Long-term effect of sitagliptin on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of the PROLOGUE study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 15:134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ida S, Murata K, Betou K, Kobayashi C, Ishihara Y, Imataka K, Uchida A, Monguchi K, Kaneko R, Fujiwara R, Takahashi H (2016) Effect of trelagliptin on vascular endothelial functions and serum adiponectin level in patients with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary single-arm prospective pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 15:153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kroller-Schon S, Knorr M, Hausding M, Oelze M, Schuff A, Schell R, Sudowe S, Scholz A, Daub S, Karbach S, Kossmann S, Gori T, Wenzel P, Schulz E, Grabbe S, Klein T, Münzel T, Daiber A (2012) Glucose-independent improvement of vascular dysfunction in experimental sepsis by dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibition. Cardiovasc Res 96:140–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kitta Y, Obata JE, Nakamura T, Hirano M, Kodama Y, Fujioka D, Saito Y, Kawabata K, Sano K, Kobayashi T, Yano T, Nakamura K, Kugiyama K (2009) Persistent impairment of endothelial vasomotor function has a negative impact on outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:323–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Margaritis M, Antonopoulos AS, Digby J, Lee R, Reilly S, Coutinho P, Shirodaria C, Sayeed R, Petrou M, De Silva R, Jalilzadeh S, Demosthenous M, Bakogiannis C, Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C, Choudhury RP, Casadei B, Channon KM, Antoniades C (2013) Interactions between vascular wall and perivascular adipose tissue reveal novel roles for adiponectin in the regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase function in human vessels. Circulation 127:2209–2221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar