Abstract
Precipitation detection is an essential step in radiance assimilation because the uncertainties in precipitation would affect the radiative transfer calculation and observation errors. The traditional precipitation detection method for microwave only detects clouds and precipitation horizontally, without considering the three-dimensional distribution of clouds. Extending precipitation detection from 2D to 3D is expected to bring more useful information to the data assimilation without using the all-sky approach. In this study, the 3D precipitation detection method is adopted to assimilate Microwave Temperature Sounder-2 (MWTS-II) onboard the Fengyun-3D, which can dynamically detect the channels above precipitating clouds by considering the near-real-time cloud parameters. Cycling data assimilation and forecasting experiments for Typhoons Lekima (2019) and Mitag (2019) are carried out. Compared with the control experiment, the quantity of assimilated data with the 3D precipitation detection increases by approximately 23%. The quality of the additional MWTS-II radiance data is close to the clear-sky data. The case studies show that the average root-mean-square errors (RMSE) of prognostic variables are reduced by 1.7% in the upper troposphere, leading to an average reduction of 4.53% in typhoon track forecasts. The detailed diagnoses of Typhoon Lekima (2019) further show that the additional MWTS-II radiances brought by the 3D precipitation detection facilitate portraying a more reasonable circulation situation, thus providing more precise structures. This paper preliminarily proves that 3D precipitation detection has potential added value for increasing satellite data utilization and improving typhoon forecasts.
摘 要
在卫星辐射率资料同化中, 云和降水的不确定性会影响辐射传输计算和观测误差确定, 因此合理的降水检测对卫星资料同化非常重要. 在传统卫星微波辐射率资料降水检测方法中, 仅从水平方向进行检测, 未考虑云的三维分布特征. 因此, 如果将降水检测从二维扩展至三维, 有望为微波辐射率资料同化带来更多有用的观测信息. 本文通过考虑近实时云参数特征, 对云顶之上晴空通道进行动态选择, 实现了风云三号 D 星微波温度计资料的三维降水检测, 并以 2019 年的台风“利奇马”和“米娜”为例, 开展了循环同化及预报试验. 试验结果表明: 采用三维降水检测方法相较采用传统方法, 参与同化的数据量增加了约 23%, 且新增辐射率资料与晴空资料的质量相当; 多时次不同预报时效结果显示, 对流层高层的平均预报均方根误差减少 1.7%, 台风路径平均预报误差减少 4.5%; 对台风“利奇马”的详细诊断进一步表明, 三维降水检测带来的新增辐射率资料有利于模拟出更合理的大气环流形势, 从而得到更精确的台风结构.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data statement. The Level-1c (L1c) datasets of the FY-3D MWTS-II and the BT of MERSI-2 were provided by the NSMC (http://data.nsmc.org.cn). The best tracks of JTWC were from International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (https://www.ncei.noaa.gov). The NCEP/GFS analysis was obtained from NOAA (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov). The NCEP FNL was obtained from NCAR (https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2). The ERA5 was obtained fron ECMWF https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/#!/home).
References
Auligné, T., and A. P. McNally, 2007: Interaction between bias correction and quality control. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 643–653, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.57.
Bauer, P., A. J. Geer, P. Lopez, and D. Salmond, 2010: Direct 4D-Var assimilation of all-sky radiances. Part I: Implementation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1868–1885, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.659.
Bauer, P., A. Thorpe, and G. Brunet, 2015: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature, 525, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956.
Buehner, M., P. L. Houtekamer, C. Charette, H. L. Mitchell, and B. He, 2010: Intercomparison of variational data assimilation and the ensemble kalman filter for global deterministic NWP. Part I: Description and single-observation experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1550–1566, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3157.1.
Carminati, F., N. Atkinson, B. Candy, and Q. F. Lu, 2021: Insights into the microwave instruments onboard the Fengyun 3D satellite: Data quality and assimilation in the met office NWP system. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1379–1396, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0010-1.
Eyre, J. R., S. J. English, and M. Forsythe, 2020: Assimilation of satellite data in numerical weather prediction. Part I: The early years. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 49–68, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3654.
Geer, A. J., and P. Bauer, 2011: Observation errors in all-sky data assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 2024–2037, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.830.
Geer, A. J., and Coauthors, 2017: Assimilating observations sensitive to cloud and precipitation. Technical memorandum, Proc. 46th Science Advisory Committee, Shinfield Park, Reading, UK, ECMWF, https://doi.org/10.21957/sz7cr1dym.
Geer, A. J., and Coauthors, 2018: All-sky satellite data assimilation at operational weather forecasting centres. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1191–1217, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3202.
Geer, A., N. Bormann, K. Lonitz, P. Weston, R. Forbes, and S. English, 2019: Recent progress in all-sky radiance assimilation. ECMWF Newslette No. 161, 8 pp.
Grody, N., J. Zhao, R. Ferraro, F. Z. Weng, and R. Boers, 2001: Determination of precipitable water and cloud liquid water over oceans from the NOAA 15 advanced microwave sounding unit. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 2943–2953, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900616.
Guidard, V., N. Fourrié, P. Brousseau, and F. Rabier, 2011: Impact of IASI assimilation at global and convective scales and challenges for the assimilation of cloudy scenes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1975–1987, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.928.
Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.
Hong, S.-Y., and J.-O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 42, 129–151.
Hong, S.-Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.
Hsiao, L.-F., D.-S. Chen, Y.-H. Kuo, Y.-R. Guo, T.-C. Yeh, J.-S. Hong, C.-T. Fong, and C.-S. Lee, 2012: Application of WRF 3DVAR to operational typhoon prediction in Taiwan: Impact of outer loop and partial cycling approaches. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 1249–1263, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAFD-11-00131.1.
Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944.
Ito, K., 2016: Errors in tropical cyclone intensity forecast by RSMC tokyo and statistical correction using environmental parameters. SOLA, 12, 247–252, https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2016-049.
Lee, J.-R., J. Li, Z. L. Li, P. Wang, and J. L. Li, 2019: ABI water vapor radiance assimilation in a regional NWP model by accounting for the surface impact. Earth and Space Science, 6, 1652–1666, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000711.
Li, J., and X. L. Zou, 2013: A quality control procedure for FY-3A MWTS measurements with emphasis on cloud detection using VIRR cloud fraction. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 30, 1704–1715, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-12-00164.1.
Li, J., and X. L. Zou, 2014: Impact of FY-3A MWTS radiances on prediction in GRAPES with comparison of two quality control schemes. Frontiers of Earth Science, 8, 251–263, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0405-3.
Li, J., and G. Q. Liu, 2016a: Assimilation of Chinese Fengyun-3B Microwave Temperature Sounder radiances into the Global GRAPES system with an improved cloud detection threshold. Frontiers of Earth Science, 10, 145–158, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-015-0499-2.
Li, J., and G. Q. Liu, 2016b: Direct assimilation of Chinese FY-3C Microwave Temperature Sounder-2 radiances in the global GRAPES system. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9, 3095–3113, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3095-2016.
Liu, Z.-Q., and F. Rabier, 2002: The interaction between model resolution, observation resolution and observation density in data assimilation: A one-dimensional study. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 1367–1386, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002320373337.
Lu, Q. F., W. Bell, P. Bauer, N. Bormann, and C. Peubey, 2011: Characterizing the FY-3A microwave temperature sounder using the ECMWF model. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 1373–1389, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-10-05008.1.
Migliorini, S., and B. Candy, 2019: All-sky satellite data assimilation of microwave temperature sounding channels at the Met Office. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 867–883, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3470.
Parrish, D. F., and J. C. Derber, 1992: The national meteorological center’s spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 1747–1763, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1747:TNMCSS>2.0.CO;2.
Qin, L. Y., Y. D. Chen, T. L. Yu, G. Ma, Y. Guo, and P. Zhang, 2020: Dynamic channel selection of microwave temperature sounding channels under cloudy conditions. Remote Sensing, 12, 403, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030403.
Saunders, R., M. Matricardi, and P. Brunel, 1999: An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1407–1425, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1999.49712555615.
Sun, J. Z., H. L. Wang, W. X. Tong, Y. Zhang, C.-Y. Lin, and D. M. Xu, 2016: Comparison of the impacts of momentum control variables on high-resolution variational data assimilation and precipitation forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 149–169, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00205.1.
Tiedtke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1779–1800, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2.
Tong, M. J., Y. Q. Zhu, L. J. Zhou, E. Liu, M. Chen, Q. H. Liu, and S.-J. Lin, 2020: Multiple hydrometeors all-sky microwave radiance assimilation in FV3GFS. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 2971–2995, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0231.1.
Wang, P., and Coauthors, 2015: Assimilation of thermodynamic information from advanced infrared sounders under partially cloudy skies for regional NWP. J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5469–5484, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022976.
Wang, P., J. Li, Z. L. Li, A. H. N. Lim, J. L. Li, T. J. Schmit, and M. D. Goldberg, 2017: The impact of cross-track infrared sounder (CrIS) cloud-cleared radiances on hurricane joaquin (2015) and matthew (2016) forecasts. J. Geophys. Res., 122, 13201–13218, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027515.
Wang, Y., and C.-C. Wu, 2004: Current understanding of tropical cyclone structure and intensity changes — a review. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 87, 257–278, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0055-6.
Weng, F. Z., L. M. Zhao, R. R. Ferraro, G. Poe, X. F. Li, and N. C. Grody, 2003: Advanced microwave sounding unit cloud and precipitation algorithms. Radio Sci., 38, 8068, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RS002679.
Weng, F. Z., T. Zhu, and B. H. Yan, 2007: Satellite data assimilation in numerical weather prediction models. Part II: Uses of rain-affected radiances from microwave observations for hurricane vortex analysis. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3910–3925, https://doi.org/10.1175/2006jas2051.1.
Weston, P., A. J. Geer, and N. Bormann, 2019: Investigations into the assimilation of AMSU-A in the presence of cloud and precipitation. EUMETSAT/ECMWF Fellowship Programme Research Rep. 50, 42 pp, https://doi.org/10.21957/ewahn9ce.
Xie, Y. H., S. Y. Fan, M. Chen, J. C. Shi, J. Q. Zhong, and X. Y. Zhang, 2019: An assessment of satellite radiance data assimilation in RMAPS. Remote Sensing, 11, 54, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010054.
Yu, H., P. Y. Chen, Q. Q. Li, and B. Tang, 2013: Current capability of operational numerical models in predicting tropical cyclone intensity in the Western North Pacific. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 353–367, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00100.1.
Zhang, M. Y., L. F. Zhang, B. Zhang, J. P. Guan, and W. You, 2019a: Assimilation of MWHS and MWTS radiance data from the FY-3A satellite with the POD-3DEnVar method for forecasting heavy rainfall. Atmospheric Research, 219, 95–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.12.023.
Zhang, P., and Coauthors, 2019b: Latest progress of the Chinese meteorological satellite program and core data processing technologies. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1027–1045, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8215-x.
Zhou, Y. P., K.-M. Lau, O. Reale, and R. Rosenberg, 2010: AIRS impact on precipitation analysis and forecast of tropical cyclones in a global data assimilation and forecast system. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L02806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl041494.
Zhu, Y. Q., and Coauthors, 2016: All-sky microwave radiance assimilation in NCEP’s GSI analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 4709–4735, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0445.1.
Zou, X., F. Weng, B. Zhang, L. Lin, Z. Qin, and V. Tallapragada, 2013: Impacts of assimilation of ATMS data in HWRF on track and intensity forecasts of 2012 four landfall hurricanes. J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11558–11576, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020405.
Acknowledgements
This work is jointly sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFC1506701 and 2017YFC1502102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41675102). The authors would also like to thank three reviewers for their many valuable comments to help us improve the quality of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Article Highlights
• The precipitation detection for satellite radiances is extended from 2D to 3D space with a dynamic channel selection method.
• With the 3D precipitation detection, the amount of assimilated FY-3D MWTS-II data is greatly increased without increasing observation error.
• The 3D precipitation detection shows the potential value added for typhoon track and intensity analysis and forecasts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, L., Chen, Y., Ma, G. et al. Assimilation of FY-3D MWTS-II Radiance with 3D Precipitation Detection and the Impacts on Typhoon Forecasts. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 40, 900–919 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1252-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1252-x
Key words
- numerical weather prediction
- radiance assimilation
- microwave temperature sounding
- FY-3D MWTS-II
- precipitation detection