Microbial community composition affects soil organic carbon turnover in mineral soils
- 780 Downloads
Soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover is the most ubiquitous and ecologically fundamental process in soils. It is generally assumed that SOC is utilised by functionally redundant soil-specific microbial communities which do not differ in their capability to mineralise soil organic matter. To challenge this assumption, incubation experiments were conducted to analyse the community-specific effects on SOC turnover for six mineral soils under different land-use. Comparisons of respiration by a native soil community and an alien community both inoculated to sterilised soils revealed 29 ± 18% higher respiration by the native community (‘home-field advantage’). Increased soil microbial community diversity, as generated by mixing several microbial inoculants, did not result in increased mineralisation rates. Even under impaired conditions, in the presence of aged engine oil as a less decomposable substance, communities with higher diversity did not show higher respiration rates. Also, in non-sterilised soils, we detected the influence of the microbial community composition on respiration rates: Investigations on the effect of mixing two communities in a 50:50 untreated soil mixture showed declining respiration in three out of six cases (by 23.9 ± 5.9%) and increased respiration in one case (by 57%) compared to the mean respiration of the two unmixed soils. These effects were highly related to the microbial community capability, with only communities with low capability profiting from mixing with a second community. Our results question the assumption of redundancy of microbial community’s functionality for SOC mineralisation in soils.
KeywordsMicrobial communities Mineralisation Home-field advantage Biodiversity Coalescence
We thank Claudia Wiese for DNA characterisation of the samples. Lena Rohe and Susanne Behn have our thanks for their dedicated help regarding soil sterilisation. For fruitful discussion, we also thank Kim Milferstedt. This work was funded by the FP7 project GHG-Europe project; grant no. 244122 and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research funded project BonRes Sustainable Subsoil Management SOIL3.
- Berns AE, Philipp H, Narres HD, Burauel P, Vereecken H, Tappe W (2008) Effect of gamma-sterilization and autoclaving on soil organic matter structure as studied by solid state NMR, UV and fluorescence spectroscopy. Europ J Soil Sci 59:540–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blanchet M, Pringault O, Bouvy M, Catala P, Oriol L, Caparros J, Ortega-Retuerta E, Intertaglia L, West N, Agis M, Got P, Joux F (2015) Changes in bacterial community metabolism and composition during the degradation of dissolved organic matter from the jellyfish Aurelia aurita in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Environ Sci Pollution Res 22:13638–13653. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3848-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, HilleRisLambers J, Clark C, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreau M (2007) From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proceedings Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274:871–876. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graham EB, Knelman JE, Schindlbacher A, Siciliano S, Breulmann M, Yannarell A, Beman JM, Abell G, Philippot L, Prosser J, Foulquier A, Yuste JC, Glanville HC, Jones DL, Angel R, Salminen J, Newton RJ, Bürgmann H, Ingram LJ, Hamer U, Siljanen HMP, Peltoniemi K, Potthast K, Bañeras L, Hartmann M, Banerjee S, Yu R-Q, Nogaro G, Richter A, Koranda M, Castle SC, Goberna M, Song B, Chatterjee A, Nunes OC, Lopes AR, Cao Y, Kaisermann A, Hallin S, Strickland MS, Garcia-Pausas J, Barba J, Kang H, Isobe K, Papaspyrou S, Pastorelli R, Lagomarsino A, Lindström ES, Basiliko N, Nemergut DR (2016) Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front Microbiol 7:214–222PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Wheatley R, Kuan HL, Boag B, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sørensen SJ, Muller S, Bloem J (2001) An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in arable soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1713–1722. doi: 10.1016/s0038-0717(01)00094-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knelman JE, Graham EB, Trahan NA, Schmidt SK, Nemergut DR (2015) Fire severity shapes plant colonization effects on bacterial community structure, microbial biomass, and soil enzyme activity in secondary succession of a burned forest. Soil BiolBiochem 90:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lützow von M, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Europ J of Soil Sci 57:426–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R-Core-Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
- Salomons W, Stigliani W (2012) Biogeodynamics of pollutants in soils and sediments: risk assessment of delayed and non-linear responses. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DV, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/aem.01541-09 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Trabelsi D, Mhamdi R (2013) Microbial inoculants and their impact on soil microbial communities: a review. Biomed Res Int :11. doi: 10.1155/2013/863240
- Xun W, Huang T, Zhao J, Ran W, Wang B, Shen Q, Zhang R (2015) Environmental conditions rather than microbial inoculum composition determine the bacterial composition, microbial biomass and enzymatic activity of reconstructed soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 90:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar