Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forest humus forms as potential indicators of soil carbon storage in Mediterranean environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the potential of forest humus forms as indicators of soil C storage. To this purpose, Mediterranean forest soils in Southern and Central Italy were examined. Sites differed for elevation, climate, parent material and vegetation conditions, while summer drought was the common ecological factor. A morpho-functional criterion, based on holorganic layers thickness and A horizon properties, was used to classify humus forms, which ranged from Dysmoder to Eumull. Such variability allowed understanding of factors influencing organic matter storage. The relations between carbon stock and humus form were investigated for the topsoil layer (0–20 cm), which was supposed to contain the soil C pools most sensitive to climate change. We found that humus forms can be grouped in statistically different populations, with respect to topsoil C stocks. The use of A horizon structure was the main diagnostic criterion and represented the most effective approach to humus classification in Mediterranean conditions. It appears that humus forms have a clear potential as indicators of organic carbon status in Mediterranean forest soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubert M, Hedde M, Decaëns T, Margerie P, Alard D, Bureau F (2005) Facteurs contrôlant la variabilité spatiale de la macrofaune du sol dans une hêtraie pure et une hêtraie-charmaie. Compte Rendues–Biologie 328:57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bens O, Buczko U, Sieber S, Hüttl RF (2006) Spatial variability of O layer thickness and humus forms under different pine beech-forest transformation stages in NE Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169(1):5–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier N, Ponge JF (1994) Humus form dynamics during the sylvogenetic cycle in a mountain spruce forest. Soil Biol Biochem 26:183–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt H, Six J, Hendrix PF (2005) Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biol Biochem 37:251–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brêthes A, Brun JJ, Jabiol B, Ponge JF, Toutain F (1995) Classification of forest humus forms: a French proposal. Ann Sci For 52:535–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brovkin V, Cherkinsky A, Goryachkin S (2008) Estimating soil carbon turnover using radiocarbon data: a case study for European Russia. Ecol Model 216:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabbi A, Köegel-Knabner I, Rumpel C (2009) Stabilised carbon in subsoil horizons is located in spatially distinct parts of the soil profile. Soil Biol Biochem 41:256–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Descheemaeker K, Muys B, Nyssen J, Sauwens W, Haile M, Poesen J, Raes D, Deckers J (2009) Humus form development during forest restoration in exclosures of the Tigray highlands, Northern Ethiopia. Res Ecol 17:280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Fons J, Klinka K (1998) Chemical and biotic properties and temporal variation of moder humus forms in the rain forest near Vancouver, British Columbia. Geoderma 86:83–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green RN, Trowbridge RL, Klinka K (1993) Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms. For Sci 39:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • IUSS, ISRIC, FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources—a framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World Soil Resources Report 103, FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • Jabiol B, Brethes A, Ponge JF, Toutain F, Brun JJ (2007) L’humus sous toutes ses formes, 2e éd. AgroParisTech-ENGREF, Nancy

  • Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleber M, Mikutta R, Torn MS, Jahn R (2005) Poorly crystalline mineral phases protect organic matter in acid subsoil horizons. Eur J Soil Sci 56:717–725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köegel-Knabner I, Guggenberger G, Kleber M, Kandeler E, Kalbitz K, Scheu S, Eusterhues K, Leinweber P (2008) Organo-mineral associations in temperate soils: integrating biology, mineralogy, and organic matter chemistry. Zeits Pflanzenern Bodenk 171:61–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P (1988) Earthworms and the soil system. Biol Fertil Soils 6:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner B, Brodowski S, Dreves A, Gleixner G, Gude A, Grootes PM, Hamer U, Heim A, Jandl G, Rong J, Kaiser K, Kalbitz K, Kramer C, Leinweber P, Rethemeyer J, Schaeffer A, Schmidt MWI, Schwark L, Wiesenberg LB (2008) How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:91–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martel YA, Paul EA (1974) The use of radiocarbon dating of organic matter in the study of soil genesis. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 38:501–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikutta R, Kleber M, Torn MS, Jahn R (2006) Stabilization of soil organic matter: association with minerals or chemical recalcitrance? Biogeochem 77:25–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mummey DL, Rillig MC, Six J (2006) Endogeic earthworms differentially influence bacterial communities associated with different soil aggregate size fractions. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1608–1614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Northup RR, Dahlgren RA, McColl JG (1998) Polyphenols as regulators of plant-litter-soil interactions in northern California’s pygmy forest: a positive feedback? Biogeochem 42:189–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page G (1968) Some effects of conifer crops on soil properties. Commonw For Rev 47:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Page G (1974) Effects of forest cover on the properties of some Newfoundland forest soils. CAN Forestry Service, Ottawa

  • Peltier A, Ponge JF, Jordana R, Ariño A (2001) Humus form in Mediterranean scrublands with Aleppo Pine. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:884–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF (2003) Humus forms in terrestrial ecosystems: a framework to biodiversity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:935–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF (2009) Effects of amendments on biological performance of forest soils—gaining a better understanding of the meso- and macrofauna in soil development. Rev For Fr 61:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF, Delhaye L (1995) The heterogeneity of humus profiles and earthworm communities in a virgin beech forest. Biol Fertil Soils 20:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF, Chevalier R, Loussot P (2002) Humus index: an integrated tool for the assessment of forest floor and topsoil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1996–2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Klinka K (1995) Spatial variability of humus forms in some coastal forest ecosystems of British Columbia. Ann Sci For 52(6):653–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I, Bruhn F (2002) Vertical distribution, age, and chemical composition of organic carbon in two forest soils of different pedogenesis. Org Geochem 33:1131–1142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadaka N, Ponge JF (2003) Climatic effects on soil trophic networks and the resulting humus profiles in holm oak (Quercus rotundifolia) forests in the high Atlas of Morocco as revealed by correspondence analysis. Eur J Soil Sci 54:767–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze K, Borken W, Muhr J, Matzner E (2009) Stock, turnover time and accumulation of organic matter in bulk and density fractions of a Podzol soil. Eur J Soil Sci 60:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielvogel S, Prietzel J, Kögel-Knabner I (2008) Soil organic matter stabilisation in acidic forest soils is preferential and soil type-specific. Eur J Soil Sci 59:674–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strandberg B, Kristiansen SM, Tybirk K (2005) Dynamic oak-scrub to forest succession: effects of management on understorey vegetation, humus forms and soils. For Ecol Manag 211(3):318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE ICP Forests (2006) Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. 2006 edition. Manual part IIIa on sampling and analysis of soils. Programme co-ordinating centre. http://www.icp-forests.org/pdf/Chapt_3a_2006(1).pdf.

  • Vacca A (2000) Effect of land use on forest floor and soil of a Quercus suber L. forest in Gallura (Sardinia, Italy). Land Degrad Dev 11:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Reiners WA (1975) Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis. Bioscience 25:376–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Lüetzow M, Köegel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Lüetzow M, Kögel-Knabner I, Ludwig B, Matzner E, Flessa H, Ekschmitt K, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Kalbitz K (2008) Stabilization mechanisms of organic matter in four temperate soils: development and application of a conceptual model. Zeits Pflanzenern Bodenk 171:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SM, Pyatt DG, Malcolm DC, Connolly T (2001) The use of ground vegetation and humus type as indicators of soil nutrient regime for an ecological site classification of British forests. For Ecol Manag 140(2–3):101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanella A, Jabiol B, Ponge JF, Sartori G, De Waal R, Van Delft B, Graefe U, Cools N, Katzensteiner K, Hager H, English M, Brethes A (2009) Toward a European humus forms reference base. Studi Trent Sci Nat 85:145–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data were supplied by the Italian Forest Service (CONECOFOR Office) and were gathered within the Pilot Project BioSoil, co-funded by the European Commission, following Regulation (EC) No. 2152/2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interaction in the community (Forest Focus).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Andreetta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreetta, A., Ciampalini, R., Moretti, P. et al. Forest humus forms as potential indicators of soil carbon storage in Mediterranean environments. Biol Fertil Soils 47, 31–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0499-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0499-z

Keywords

Navigation