Improved Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation neural network by particle swarm and whale optimization algorithms to predict the deflection of RC beams

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a novel computer-aided method for the prediction of the deflection of reinforced concrete beams (DRCB) under concentrated loads. To this end, in the present work, a Levenberg–Marquardt-based backpropagation novel neural network model, optimized by the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), called WOA-LMBPNN, has been developed. Specifically, a neural network, using the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation training algorithm with multiple hidden layers, was optimized by the WOA, aiming to obtain higher accuracy in predicting DRCB. For the training of the models, 120 experiments with the geometrical and mechanical properties of concrete beams were compiled using were used as the input parameters. Seven datasets with different number of input variables were investigated to evaluate the effect of the input variables on DRCB. For comparison purposes, another swarm optimization algorithm (i.e., particle swarm optimization—PSO) was also used to optimize the LMBPNN model (i.e., PSO-LMBPNN model). The results obtained by the PSO-LMBPNN and WOA-LMBPNN models are then compared based on the different datasets. Finally, the results revealed the effective role of the WOA, as well as the efficiency and robustness of the new hybrid WOA-LMBPNN model in predicting DRCB.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. 1.

    Tran TM, Do TN, Dinh HTT, Vu HX, Ferrier E (2020) A 2-D numerical model of the mechanical behavior of the textile-reinforced concrete composite material: effect of textile reinforcement ratio. J Min Earth Sci 61(3):56–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Quang DH, Dinh HP, Anh BT, Huong Thi NT, Tuan CA (2020) Research on the possibility of applying concrete using recycled aggregates from waste concrete to build rural roads. J Min Earth Sci 61(6):66–73

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ballim Y, Reid J (2003) Reinforcement corrosion and the deflection of RC beams––an experimental critique of current test methods. Cement Concr Compos 25(6):625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kalkan İ (2010) Deflection prediction for reinforced concrete beams through different effective moment of inertia expressions. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi 5(1):1–1

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bischoff PH (2005) Reevaluation of deflection prediction for concrete beams reinforced with steel and fiber reinforced polymer bars. J Struct Eng 131(5):752–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bakoss S, Gilbert R, Faulkes K, Pulmano V (1982) Long-term deflections of reinforced concrete beams. Mag Concr Res 34(121):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bai C, Nguyen H, Asteris PG, Nguyen-Thoi T, Zhou J (2020) A refreshing view of soft computing models for predicting the deflection of reinforced concrete beams. Appl Soft Comput 97:106831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bischoff PH (2007) Rational model for calculating deflection of reinforced concrete beams and slabs. Can J Civ Eng 34(8):992–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kaczmarek M, Szymańska A (2016) Application of artificial neural networks to predict the deflections of reinforced concrete beams. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 38(2):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gribniak V, Cervenka V, Kaklauskas G (2013) Deflection prediction of reinforced concrete beams by design codes and computer simulation. Eng Struct 56:2175–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Thi ND, Duc TT, Duc NM, Anh BT (2020) Research on the possibility of using the sea sand in the soft soil treatment by the cement - reinforced pile method. J Min Earth Sci 61(6):102–108

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nguyen T, Kashani A, Ngo T, Bordas S (2019) Deep neural network with high-order neuron for the prediction of foamed concrete strength. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 34(4):316–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yin T, Zhu HP (2019) An efficient algorithm for architecture design of Bayesian neural network in structural model updating. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 35:354–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tong Z, Gao J, Sha A, Hu L, Li S (2018) Convolutional neural network for asphalt pavement surface texture analysis. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 33(12):1056–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kang D, Cha YJ (2018) Autonomous UAVs for structural health monitoring using deep learning and an ultrasonic beacon system with geo-tagging. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 33(10):885–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz MS, Boashash B, Sodano H, Inman DJ (2018) 1-D CNNs for structural damage detection: verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark data. Neurocomputing 275:1308–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhou J, Qiu Y, Zhu S, Armaghani DJ, Li C, Nguyen H, Yagiz S (2021) Optimization of support vector machine through the use of metaheuristic algorithms in forecasting TBM advance rate. Eng Appl Artif Intell 97:104015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhou J, Qiu Y, Armaghani DJ, Zhang W, Li C, Zhu S, Tarinejad R (2020) Predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition: A comparative study among six XGB-based metaheuristic techniques. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang X, Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Tran Q-H, Nguyen D-A, Bui DT, Moayedi H (2019) Novel soft computing model for predicting blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit mines based on particle swarm optimization and XGBoost. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09492-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang B, Moayedi H, Nguyen H, Foong LK, Rashid ASA (2019) Feasibility of a novel predictive technique based on artificial neural network optimized with particle swarm optimization estimating pullout bearing capacity of helical piles. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00764-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shang Y, Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Tran Q-H, Moayedi H (2019) A novel artificial intelligence approach to predict blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit mines based on the firefly algorithm and artificial neural network. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09503-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nguyen H, Moayedi H, Jusoh WAW, Sharifi A (2019) Proposing a novel predictive technique using M5Rules-PSO model estimating cooling load in energy-efficient building system. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00735-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nguyen H, Moayedi H, Foong LK, Al Najjar HAH, Jusoh WAW, Rashid ASA, Jamali J (2019) Optimizing ANN models with PSO for predicting short building seismic response. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00733-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nguyen H, Drebenstedt C, Bui X-N, Bui DT (2019) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration in an open-pit mine by a novel hybrid model based on clustering and artificial neural network. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09470-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Tran Q-H, Mai N-L (2019) A new soft computing model for estimating and controlling blast-produced ground vibration based on hierarchical K-means clustering and cubist algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 77:376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Nguyen-Thoi T, Ragam P, Moayedi H (2019) Toward a state-of-the-art of fly-rock prediction technology in open-pit mines using EANNs model. Appl Sci 9(21):4554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Moayedi H (2019) A comparison of advanced computational models and experimental techniques in predicting blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit coal mine. Acta Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00304-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Asteris PG, Argyropoulos I, Cavaleri L, Rodrigues H, Varum H, Thomas J, Lourenço PB (2018) Masonry compressive strength prediction using artificial neural networks. In: Paper presented at the in international conference on transdisciplinary multispectral modeling and cooperation for the preservation of cultural heritage, Cham, Switzerland

  29. 29.

    Huang L, Asteris PG, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Tahir M (2019) Invasive weed optimization technique-based ANN to the prediction of rock tensile strength. Appl Sci 9(24):5372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Asteris PG, Ashrafian A, Rezaie-Balf M (2019) Prediction of the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete using surrogate models. Comput Concr 24:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Asteris PG, Nozhati S, Nikoo M, Cavaleri L, Nikoo M (2019) Krill herd algorithm-based neural network in structural seismic reliability evaluation. Mech Adv Mater Struct 26(13):1146–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Asteris PG, Roussis PC, Douvika MG (2017) Feed-forward neural network prediction of the mechanical properties of sandcrete materials. Sensors 17(6):1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Darain KM, Shamshirband S, Jumaat MZ, Obaydullah M (2015) Adaptive neuro fuzzy prediction of deflection and cracking behavior of NSM strengthened RC beams. Constr Build Mater 98:276–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mohammadhassani M, Nezamabadi-pour H, Jumaat MZ, Jameel M, Arumugam A (2013) Application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and linear regressions (LR) to predict the deflection of concrete deep beams. Comput Concr 11(3):237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Linlin W, Yijie L, Kegang W (2012) Improved BP algorithm in re-inforced concrete beam deflection forecast. Comput Meas Control 1:50–58

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mishra M, Agarwal A, Maity D (2019) Neural-network-based approach to predict the deflection of plain, steel-reinforced, and bamboo-reinforced concrete beams from experimental data. SN Appl Sci 1(6):584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Whiteman T, Lichti D, Chandler I (2002) Measurement of deflections in concrete beams by close-range digital photogrammetry. In: Proceedings of the symposium on geospatial theory, processing and applications, pp 9–12

  38. 38.

    El-Mihilmy MT, Tedesco JW (2000) Deflection of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plates. Struct J 97(5):679–688

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Venkateshwaran A, Tan KH (2018) Load-carrying capacity of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams at large deflections. Struct Concr 19(3):670–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Daugevičius M, Valivonis J, Skuturna T (2019) Prediction of deflection of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer. Materials 12(9):1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shishegaran A, Khalili MR, Karami B, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran A (2020) Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. Int J Impact Eng 139:103527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nguyen HD, Zhang Q, Choi E, Duan W (2020) An improved deflection model for FRP RC beams using an artificial intelligence-based approach. Eng Struct 219:110793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Adhikary BB, Mutsuyoshi H (2006) Prediction of shear strength of steel fiber RC beams using neural networks. Constr Build Mater 20(9):801–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Amani J, Moeini R (2012) Prediction of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and artificial neural network. Scientia Iranica 19(2):242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Erdem H (2010) Prediction of the moment capacity of reinforced concrete slabs in fire using artificial neural networks. Adv Eng Softw 41(2):270–276

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Cai B, Xu L-F, Fu F (2019) Shear resistance prediction of post-fire reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural network. Int J Concr Struct Mater 13(1):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yaseen ZM, Tran MT, Kim S, Bakhshpoori T, Deo RC (2018) Shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beam using hybrid intelligence models: a new approach. Eng Struct 177:244–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Asteris PG, Armaghani DJ, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Karayannis CG, Pilakoutas K (2019) Predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Comput Concr 24(5):469–488

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Armaghani DJ, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Karamani C, Skentou A, Zoumpoulaki I, Asteris PG (2019) Soft computing-based techniques for concrete beams shear strength. Proc Struct Integr 17:924–933

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hu B, Wu Y-F (2018) Effect of shear span-to-depth ratio on shear strength components of RC beams. Eng Struct 168:770–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Sanal I (2019) Effect of shear span-to-depth ratio on mechanical performance and cracking behavior of high strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete beams without conventional reinforcement. Mech Adv Mater Struct 27(21):1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1527963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kabosh M, Ahmed S (2018) Study of long-term deflection in reinforced concrete one-way slab. In: Conference proceedings civil engineering 2018

  53. 53.

    Yao S-j, Zhang D, Lu F-y, Wang W, Chen X-g (2016) Damage features and dynamic response of RC beams under blast. Eng Fail Anal 62:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lan S, Crawford JE, Morrill KB (2005) Design of reinforced concrete columns to resist the effects of suitcase bombs. In: International proceeding of 6th international conference on shock and impacts loads on structures, Australia, pp 5–10

  55. 55.

    Manuel RF, Slight BW, Suter GT (1971) Deep beam behavior affected by length and shear span variations. Am Concr Inst J Proc 68(12):954–958

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ngoc LD, Van DC (2021) Application of fuzzy-logic to design fuzzy compensation controller for speed control system to reduce vibration of CBШ-250T drilling machine in mining industry. J Min Earth Sci 61(6):90–96

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bonnlander BV, Weigend AS (1994) Selecting input variables using mutual information and nonparametric density estimation. In: Proceedings of the 1994 international symposium on artificial neural networks (ISANN’94). Citeseer, pp 42–50

  58. 58.

    Zhou J, Koopialipoor M, Li E, Armaghani DJ (2020) Prediction of rockburst risk in underground projects developing a neuro-bee intelligent system. B Eng Geol Environ 79(8):4265–4279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01788-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Xie C, Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Choi Y, Zhou J, Nguyen-Trang T (2020) Predicting rock size distribution in mine blasting using various novel soft computing models based on meta-heuristics and machine learning algorithms. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nguyen H (2021) Application of the k - nearest neighbors algorithm for predicting blast - induced ground vibration in open - pit coal mines: a case study. J Min Earth Sci 61(6):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Olden JD, Joy MK, Death RG (2004) An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Model 178(3–4):389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Olden JD, Jackson DA (2002) Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 154(1–2):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project supported by the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province(Grant No. 18A295).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoang Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 60 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Nguyen, H., Nguyen-Thoi, T. et al. Improved Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation neural network by particle swarm and whale optimization algorithms to predict the deflection of RC beams. Engineering with Computers (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01267-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Reinforced concrete beam
  • Evolutionary computing
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Smart structures
  • Neural network computing
  • Computer-aided method