By assist of novel evolutionary science, the classification accuracy of neural computing is improved in analyzing the bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. To this end, Harris hawks optimization (HHO) and dragonfly algorithm (DA) are applied to a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) predictive tool for adjusting the connecting weights and biases in predicting the failure probability using seven settlement key factors, namely unit weight, friction angle, elastic modulus, dilation angle, Poisson’s ratio, applied stress, and setback distance. As the first result, incorporating both HHO and DA metaheuristic algorithms resulted in higher efficiency of the MLP. Moreover, referring to the calculated area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), as well as the calculated mean square error, the DA-MLP (AUC = 0.942 and MSE = 0.1171) outperforms the HHO-MLP (AUC = 0.915 and MSE = 0.1350) and typical MLP (AUC = 0.890 and MSE = 0.1416). Furthermore, the DA surpassed the HHO in terms of time-effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Banimahd M, Woodward P (2006) Load-displacement and bearing capacity of foundations on granular soils using a multi-surface kinematic constitutive soil model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30:865–886
Kaya A, Bulut F, Dağ S (2018) Bearing capacity and slope stability assessment of rock masses at the Subasi viaduct site, NE, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 11:162
Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York
Keskin MS, Laman M (2013) Model studies of bearing capacity of strip footing on sand slope. KSCE J Civ Eng 17:699–711
Zdravković L, Potts D, Jackson C (2003) Numerical study of the effect of preloading on undrained bearing capacity. Int J Geomech 3:1–10
Serrano A, Olalla C, Jimenez R (2015) Analytical bearing capacity of strip footings in weightless materials with power-law failure criteria. J Int J Geomech 16:04015010
Cascone E, Casablanca O (2016) Static and seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 84:204–223
Baazouzi M, Benmeddour D, Mabrouki A, Mellas M (2016) 2D numerical analysis of shallow foundation rested near slope under inclined loading. Procedia Eng 143:623–634
Mosallanezhad M, Moayedi H (2017) Comparison analysis of bearing capacity approaches for the strip footing on layered soils. Arab J Sci Eng 42:3711–3722
Bowles JE (1996) Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-Hill, Chicago
Behera RN, Patra CR, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2013) Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically inclined loaded strip footing by ANN, part I. Int J Geotech Eng 7:36–44
Bagińska M, Srokosz PE (2019) The optimal ANN Model for predicting bearing capacity of shallow foundations trained on scarce data. KSCE J Civ Eng 23:130–137
Acharyya R, Dey A, Kumar B (2018) Finite element and ANN-based prediction of bearing capacity of square footing resting on the crest of c-φ soil slope. Int J Geotech Eng 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1435022
Padmini D, Ilamparuthi K, Sudheer K (2008) Ultimate bearing capacity prediction of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils using neurofuzzy models. Comput Geotech 35:33–46
Das M, Dey AK (2018) Determination of bearing capacity of stone column with application of neuro-fuzzy system. KSCE J Civ Eng 22:1677–1683
Maizir H, Suryanita R, Jingga H (2016) Estimation of pile bearing capacity of single driven pile in sandy soil using finite element and artificial neural network methods. J Int J Appl Phys Sci 2:45–50
Ziaee SA, Sadrossadat E, Alavi AH, Mohammadzadeh Shadmehri D (2015) Explicit formulation of bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rock masses using artificial neural networks: application and supplementary studies. Environ Earth Sci 73:3417–3431
Lee I-M, Lee J-H (1996) Prediction of pile bearing capacity using artificial neural networks. Comput Geotech 18:189–200
Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Modelling and optimization of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing near a slope by soft computing methods. Appl Soft Comput 66:208–219
Gao W, Dimitrov D, Abdo H (2018) Tight independent set neighborhood union condition for fractional critical deleted graphs and ID deleted graphs. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser S 12:711–721
Nguyen H, Mehrabi M, Kalantar B, Moayedi H, MaM Abdullahi (2019) Potential of hybrid evolutionary approaches for assessment of geo-hazard landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 10:1667–1693
Gao W, Guirao JLG, Basavanagoud B, Wu J (2018) Partial multi-dividing ontology learning algorithm. Inf Sci 467:35–58
Moayedi H, Raftari M, Sharifi A, Jusoh WAW, Rashid ASA (2019) Optimization of ANFIS with GA and PSO estimating α ratio in driven piles. Eng Comput 35:1–12
Gao W, Wang W, Dimitrov D, Wang Y (2018) Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating. Arab J Chem 11:793–801
Gao W, Wu H, Siddiqui MK, Baig AQ (2018) Study of biological networks using graph theory. Saudi J Biol Sci 25:1212–1219
Gao W, Guirao JLG, Abdel-Aty M, Xi W (2019) An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser S 12:877–886
Moayedi H, Moatamediyan A, Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Bui DT, Rashid ASA (2019) Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity through various novel evolutionary and neural network models. Eng Comput 35:1–17
Moayedi H, Armaghani DJ (2018) Optimizing an ANN model with ICA for estimating bearing capacity of driven pile in cohesionless soil. Eng Comput 34:347–356
McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133
ASCE Task Committee (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: hydrologic applications. J Hydrol Eng 5:124–137
Yu H, Wilamowski BM (2011) Levenberg–marquardt training. Ind Electron Handb 5:1
Moré JJ (1978) The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, numerical analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–116
Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11:431–441
El-Bakry MY (2003) Feed forward neural networks modeling for K–P interactions. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 18:995–1000
Cigizoglu HK, Kişi Ö (2005) Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Hydrol Res 36:49–64
Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris Hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Fut Gen Comput Syst 97:849–872
Bao X, Jia H, Lang C (2019) A novel hybrid Harris hawks optimization for color image multilevel thresholding segmentation. IEEE Access 7:76529–76546
Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27:1053–1073
Sureshkumar K, Ponnusamy V (2019) Power flow management in micro grid through renewable energy sources using a hybrid modified dragonfly algorithm with bat search algorithm. Energy 181:1166–1178
Xu L, Jia H, Lang C, Peng X, Sun K (2019) A novel method for multilevel color image segmentation based on dragonfly algorithm and differential evolution. IEEE Access 7:19502–19538
Yuan Y, Lv L, Wang X, Song X (2019) Optimization of a frame structure using the Coulomb force search strategy-based dragonfly algorithm. Eng Optim 51:1–17
Khalilpourazari S, Khalilpourazary S (2018) Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 31:1–12
Yasen M, Al-Madi N, Obeid N (2018) Optimizing neural networks using dragonfly algorithm for medical prediction. In: 2018 8th international conference on computer science and information technology (CSIT)
Mafarja M, Heidari AA, Faris H, Mirjalili S, Aljarah I (2020) Dragonfly algorithm: theory, literature review, and application in feature selection. In: Nature-inspired optimizers. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–67
Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Mosallanezhad M, Rashid ASA, Pradhan B (2018) Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO–ANN technique. Eng Comput 35:967–984
Nguyen H, Moayedi H, Foong LK, Al Najjar HAH, Jusoh WAW, Rashid ASA, Jamali J (2019) Optimizing ANN models with PSO for predicting short building seismic response. Eng Comput 35:1–15
Beguería S (2006) Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Nat Hazards 37:315–329
Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293
Lasko TA, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, Ohno-Machado L (2005) The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform 38:404–415
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Moayedi, H., Abdullahi, M.M., Nguyen, H. et al. Comparison of dragonfly algorithm and Harris hawks optimization evolutionary data mining techniques for the assessment of bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. Engineering with Computers 37, 437–447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00834-w
- Bearing capacity analysis
- Dragonfly algorithm
- Evolutionary science