Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic construction material layout planning optimization model by integrating 4D BIM

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction material layout planning is a key project in temporary facility layouts. When allocating materials without effective resource consolidation and planning in advance, construction managers usually have difficulties in comprehensively determining resource demand to optimize material layout. This also leads to reduced efficiency, increased cost, and unnecessary loss of time. This study proposed the dynamic construction material layout planning optimization model to investigate the optimization of material layout from the perspective of dynamic task scheduling. In addition to the variables of schedule advancement and evolution, dynamic material requirements, and changes in storage sites and areas, task float times were analyzed to account for the changes in three-dimensional travel distances between material supply and demand sites concurrently with changes in task schedules and ensure that the observations conformed to real-time conditions. First, schedule and building information modeling techniques as well as the procedures for quantity take-off and construction materials and quantity analysis were consolidated to produce dynamic material requirements data for construction layout planning. Second, the symbiotic organisms search algorithm was applied to derive the optimized construction site material layout plan. Finally, the proposed model was applied to a construction project. The required total distance for the dynamic material layout plan was 954,736 m, which saved roughly half of the required distance compared with the fixed material layout plan of 1,659,457 m. This greatly reduced material transportation costs and validated the effectiveness of the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hegazy T, Elbeltagi E (1999) EvoSite: evolution-based model for site layout planning. J Comput Civ Eng 13(3):198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng MY, O’Connor JT (1996) Site layout of construction temporary facilities using enhanced-geographical information system (GIS). J Constr Eng Manag ASCE 112(4):329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamiani A (1987) CONSITE: a knowledge-based expert system framework for construction site layout. University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hegazy TM, Elbeltagi E (2000) Simplified spreadsheet solutions: a model for site layout planning. J Cost Eng 42(1):24–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee RC, Moore JM (1967) CORELAP: computerized relationship layout planning. J Ind Eng 8(3):195–200

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith DM (1987) An investigation of the space constraint problem in construction planning. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tommelein ID, Zouein PP (1993) Interactive dynamic layout planning. J Constr Eng Manag ASCE 119(2):266–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeh I-C (1995) Construction-site layout using annealed neural network. J Comput Civ Eng 9(3):201–208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zouein PP (1996) MoveSchedule: a planning tool for scheduling space use on construction sites. Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abdou G, Dutta SP (1990) An integrated approach to facilities layout using expert systems. Int J Prod Res 28(4):685–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baykasoğlu A, Gindy NNZ (2001) A simulated annealing algorithm for dynamic layout problem. Comput Oper Res 28(14):1403–1426

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Heragu SS, Kusiak A (1990) Machine layout: an optimization and knowledge-based approach. Int J Prod Res 28(4):615–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Preas BT, Lorenzetti MJ, Ackland BD (1988) Physical design automation of VLSI systems. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riedel R (2011) Facilities planning—4th edition by JA Tompkins, JA White, YA Bozer, JMA Tanchoco. Int J Prod Res 49(24):7519–7520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng M-Y, Yang S-C (2001) GIS-based cost estimates integrating with material layout planning. J Constr Eng Manag 127(4):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Said H, El-Rayes K (2012) Optimal material logistics planning in congested construction sites, construction research congress 2012, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, pp 1580–1589

  17. Lee H-Y, Yang IT, Lin Y-C (2012) Laying out the occupant flows in public buildings for operating efficiency. Build Environ 51:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lien L-C, Cheng M-Y (2012) A hybrid swarm intelligence based particle-bee algorithm for construction site layout optimization. Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9642–9650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mawdesley MJ, Al-jibouri SH, Yang H (2002) Genetic algorithms for construction site layout in project planning. J Constr Eng Manag 128(5):418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Succar B (2009) Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom Constr 18(3):357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2011) BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designery, engineers, and contractors. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng MY, Prayogo D (2014) Symbiotic organisms search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct 139:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. U.o.T.a.A.C.I. Institute (1987) U.o.T.a.A.B.o.E. Research, Constructability Concepts File. Institute, Bureau of Engineering Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaming PF, Holt GD, Kometa ST, Olomolaiye PO (1998) Severity diagnosis of productivity problems—a reliability analysis. Int J Proj Manag 16(2):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tatum CB, Harris JA (1981) Construction plant requirements for nuclear sites. J Constr Div 107(4):543–550

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rad PF, James BM (1983) The layout of temporary construction facilities. Cost Eng 25(2):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  27. Warszawski (1990) Expert systems for crane selection. Constr Manag Econ 8(2):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez-Ramos WE, Francis RL (1983) Single crane location optimization. J Constr Eng Manag 109(4):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tommelein ID, Levitt RE, Hayes-Roth B (1989) SightPlan: an artificial intelligence tool to assist construction manager with site layout. In: 6th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction, San Francisco, USA, pp 340–347

  30. Deshpande SD, Krishnamoorthy S, Deshpande VB (1987) Computer-aided site layout for construction projects. Omega 15(2):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadeghpour O, Moselhi ST, Alkass (2006) Computer-aided site layout planning. J Constr Eng Manag 132(2):143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jang H, Lee S, Choi S (2007) Optimization of floor-level construction material layout using genetic algorithms. Autom Constr 16(4):531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng M-Y, Lien L-C (2012) A hybrid AI-based particle bee algorithm for facility layout optimization. Eng Comput 28(1):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang C, Wong CK (2015) Optimisation of site layout planning for multiple construction stages with safety considerations and requirements. Autom Constr 53:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Volk R, Stengel J, Schultmann F (2014) Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings—literature review and future needs. Autom Constr 38:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiviniemi A, Karlshøj J, Tarandi V, Bell H, Karud OJ (2008) Review of the development and implementation of IFC compatible BIM

  37. Choi J, Kim H, Kim I (2015) Open BIM-based quantity take-off system for schematic estimation of building frame in early design stage. J Comput Des Eng 2(1):16–25

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hartmann T, van Meerveld H, Vossebeld N, Adriaanse A (2012) Aligning building information model tools and construction management methods. Autom Constr 22(Supplement C):605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nicolle C, Cruz C (2011) Semantic building information model and multimedia for facility management. In: Filipe J, Cordeiro J (eds) Web information systems and technologies: 6th international conference, WEBIST 2010, Valencia, Spain, April 7–10, 2010, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, Berlin, pp 14–29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Popescu C (1981) Managing temporary facilities for large projects. In: Proceeding of the project management institute and INTERNET joint symposium, Boston, MA, pp 170–173

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work that is described in this paper has been carried out with the support of the Ministry of Science and Technology, ROC (Project No. 102-2221-E-011-076-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nai-Wen Chang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, MY., Chang, NW. Dynamic construction material layout planning optimization model by integrating 4D BIM. Engineering with Computers 35, 703–720 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0628-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0628-0

Keywords

Navigation