Prediction of building damage induced by tunnelling through an optimized artificial neural network

  • S. Moosazadeh
  • E. Namazi
  • H. Aghababaei
  • A. Marto
  • H. Mohamad
  • M. Hajihassani
Original Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Ground surface movement due to tunnelling in urban areas imposes strains to the adjacent buildings through distortion and rotation, and may consequently cause structural damage. The methods of building damage estimation are generally based on a two-stage procedure in which ground movement in the greenfield condition is estimated empirically, and then, a separate method based on structural mechanic principles is used to assess the damage. This paper predicts the building damage based on a model obtained from artificial neural network and a particle swarm optimization algorithm. To develop the model, the input and output parameters were collected from Line No. 2 of the Karaj Urban Railway Project in Iran. Accordingly, two case studies of damaged buildings were used to assess the ability of this model to predict the damage. Comparison with the measured data indicated that the model achieved the satisfactory results.

Keywords

Building damage Ground movement Tunnelling Artificial neural network Particle swarm optimization 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Skempton AW, MacDonald DH (1956) The allowable settlement of buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng 5(3):727–768Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charles JA, Skinner HD (2004) Settlement and tilt of low-rise buildings. Geotechn Eng 157:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burland JB, Wroth CP (1974) Settlement of buildings and associated damage. In: Proc conference settlement of structures. Pentech Press, London, pp 611–654Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boscardin MD, Cording JC (1989) Response to excavation-induced settlement. J Geotech Eng 115(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boone SJ (1996) Ground-movement-related building damage. J Geotech Eng 122(11):886–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boone SJ, Westland J, Nusink R (1999) Comparative evaluation of building responses to an adjacent braced excavation. Can Geotech J 36:210–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finno RJ, Voss FT, Rossow E, Tanner Blackburn J (2005) Evaluating damage potential in buildings affected by excavations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1199–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Netzel H (2009) Building response due to ground movements. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Namazi E, Mohamad H (2013) Potential damage assessment in buildings undergoing tilt. Proc Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng 166(4):365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Namazi E, Mohamad H (2013) Assessment of building damage induced by three-dimensional ground movements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(4):608–618.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Potts DM, Addenbrooke TI (1997) A structure’s influence on tunnelling-induced ground movements. Proc ICE-Geotech Eng 125(2):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Son M, Cording EJ (2005) Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:162–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Son M, Cording EJ (2007) Evaluation of building stiffness for building response analysis to excavation-induced ground movements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:995–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franzius JN, Potts DM, Burland JB (2006) The response of the surface structure to tunnel construction. Proc ICE Geotech Eng 159(1): 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dimmock PS, Mair RJ (2008) Effect of building stiffness on tunnelling-induced ground movement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(4):438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrell RP, Mair RJ, Sciotti A, Pigorini A, Ricci M (2012) The response of buildings to tunnelling: a case study. Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, pp 877–885Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Predicting CO2 permeability of bituminous coal using statistical and adaptive neuro-fuzzy analysis. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 42:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Developing novel models using neural networks and fuzzy systems for the prediction of strength of rocks from key geomechanical properties. Measurement 102:158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh R, Umrao RK, Ahmad M, Ansari MK, Sharma LK, Singh TN (2017) Prediction of geomechanical parameters using soft computing and multiple regression approach. Measurement 99:108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hasanipanah M, Armaghani DJ, Amnieh HB, Majid MZA, Tahir MM (2017) Application of PSO to develop a powerful equation for prediction of flyrock due to blasting. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):1043–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hasanipanah M, Amnieh HB, Arab H, Zamzam MS (2016) Feasibility of PSO-ANFIS model to estimate rock fragmentation produced by mine blasting. Neural Comput Appl 1–10Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taheri K, Hasanipanah M, Golzar SB, Majid MZA (2017) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm-artificial neural network for forecasting the blast-produced ground vibration. Eng Comput 33(3):689–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mokfi T, Shahnazar A, Bakhshayeshi I, Derakhsh AM, Tabrizi O (2018) Proposing of a new soft computing-based model to predict peak particle velocity induced by blasting. Eng Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0578-6 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh TN, Singh V (2005) An intelligent approach to prediction and control ground vibration in mines. Geotech Geol Eng 23(3):249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharma LK, Singh R, Umrao RK, Sharma KM, Singh TN (2017) Evaluating the modulus of elasticity of soil using soft computing system. Eng Comput 33(3):497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singh TN, Verma AK (2012) Comparative analysis of intelligent algorithms to correlate strength and petrographic properties of some schistose rocks. Eng Comput 28(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim CY, Bae GJ, Hong SW, Park CH, Moon HK, Shin HS (2001) Neural network based prediction of ground surface settlements due to tunnelling. Comput Geotech 28(6):517–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boubou R, Emeriault F, Kastner R (2010) Artificial neural network application for the prediction of ground surface movements induced by shield tunnelling. Can Geotech J 47:1214–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adoko AC, Wu L (2012) Estimation of convergence of a high-speed railway tunnel in weak rocks using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(1):11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rafiai H, Moosavi M (2012) An approximate ANN-based solution for convergence of lined circular tunnels in elasto-plastic rock masses with anisotropic stresses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 27:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liou SW, Wang CM, Huang YF (2009) Integrative discovery of multifaceted sequence patterns by frame-relayed search and hybrid PSO-ANN. J Univers Comput Sci 15(4):742–764Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosenblatt F (1959) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65:386–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1986) Computing with neural circuits: a model. Science 233:625–633CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Methods 43:3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks perth, Australia 1942–1948Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shi Y, Eberhart RC (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE international congress on evolutionary computation, pp 69–73Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization: an overview. Swarm Intell 1:33–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bansal JC, Singh PK, Saraswat M, Verma A, Jadon SS, Abraham A (2011) Inertia weight strategies in particle swarm optimization. In: Third world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing. IEEE, pp 640–647Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hajihassani M, Armaghani DJ, Sohaei H, Mohamad ET, Marto A (2014) Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Appl Acoust 80:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schmidt B (1969) Settlements and ground movements associated with tunnelling in soil PhD Thesis, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peck RB (1969) Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering state of the art, pp 225–290Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    O’Reilly MP, New BM (1982) Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-their magnitude and prediction. Tunnelling 82. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, pp 55–64Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Breth H, Chambosse G (1974) Settlement behavior of buildings above subway tunnels in Frankfurt clay. In: Proceedings of the conference on settlement of structures, London, pp 329–336Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Frischmann WW, Hellings JE, Gittoes S, Snowden C (1994) Protection of the mansion house against damage caused by ground movements due to the docklands light railway extension. In: Proceedings of the ICE-geotechnical engineering, vol 107, No 2, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mair RJ, Taylor RN (2001) Settlement predictions for Neptune, Murdoch, and Clegg Houses and adjacent masonry walls building response to tunnelling—case studies from construction of the Jubilee line extension, London. Vol 1 projects and methods. In: Burland JB, Standing JR, Jardine FM (eds) CIRIA SP200, pp 217–228Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Burland JB, Broms BB, de Mello VFB (1977) Behavior of foundations and structures. In: State-of-the-art report proc 9th int conf on soil mech and found engr, vol II, Tokyo, pp 495–546Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):58–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Diamantidis NA, Karlis D, Giakoumakis EA (2000) Unsupervised stratification of cross-validation for accuracy estimation. Artif Intell 116(1):1–16MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mining EngineeringSahand University of TechnologyTabrizIran
  2. 2.COWILondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Geotechnics and TransportationUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohorMalaysia
  4. 4.Civil and Environmental Engineering DepartmentUniversiti Teknologi PetronasPerakMalaysia
  5. 5.Department of Mining EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations