Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 204, Issue 4, pp 409–417 | Cite as

Slow viscoelastic response of resilin

  • Alexander Kovalev
  • Alexander Filippov
  • Stanislav N. Gorb
Original Paper
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

The high importance of resilin in invertebrate biomechanics is widely known. It is generally assumed to be an almost perfect elastomer in different tissues. Whereas mechanical properties of resilin were previously determined mainly in tension, here we aimed at studying its mechanical properties in compression. Microindentation of resilin from the wing hinge of Locusta migratoria revealed the clear viscoelastic response of resilin: about a quarter of the mechanical response was assigned to a viscous component in our experiments. Mechanical properties were characterized using a generalized Maxwell model with two characteristic time constants, poroelasticity theory, and alternatively using a 1D model with just one characteristic time constant. Slow viscous responses with 1.7 and 16 s characteristic times were observed during indentation. These results demonstrate that the locust flight system is adapted to both fast and slow mechanical processes. The fast highly elastic process is related to the flight function and the slow viscoelastic process may be related to the wing folding.

Keywords

Viscoelasticity Stress relaxation Generalized Maxwell model Insect Wing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Bernhard Jäkle for technical support in performing experiments. This study was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Georg Forster Research Award to AF).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Andersen SO (1963) Characterization of a new type of cross-linkage in resilin, a rubber-like protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 69:249–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen SO, Weis-Fogh T (1964) Resilin. A rubberlike protein in arthropod cuticle. Adv Insect Physiol 2:1–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appel E, Gorb SN (2011) Resilin-bearing wing vein joints in the dragonfly Epiophlebia superstes. Bioinsp Biomim 6:046006 (11 pp)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Argatov II, Popov VL (2016) Rebound indentation problem for a viscoelastic half-space and axisymmetric indenter—solution by the method of dimensionality reduction. Z Angew Math Mech 96(8):956–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey K, Weis-Fogh T (1961) Amino acid composition of a new rubber-like protein, resilin. Biochim Biophys Acta 48:452–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennet-Clark H (2007) The first description of resilin. J Exp Biol 210:3879–3881.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.001339 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennet-Clark HC, Lucey ECA (1967) The jump of the flea: a study of the energetics and a model of the mechanism. J Exp Biol 47:59–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng L, Xia X, Scriven LE, Gerberich WW (2005) Spherical-tip indentation of viscoelastic material. Mech Mat 37:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen RM (1982) Theory of viscoelasticity. Second Edition. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott GF, Huxley AF, Weis-Fogh T (1965) On the structure of resilin. J Mol Biol 13:791–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Filippov AE, Popov VL (2007) Fractal Tomlinson model for mesoscopic friction: from microscopic velocity-dependent damping to macroscopic Coulomb friction. Phys Rev E 75:027103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geike T, Popov VL (2007) Mapping of three-dimensional contact problems into one dimension. Phys Rev E 76:036710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorb SN (2004) The jumping mechanism of cicada Cercopis vulnerata (Auchenorrhyncha, Cercopidae): skeleton-muscle organisation, frictional surfaces, and inverse-kinematic model of leg movements. Arthr Str Dev 33(3):201–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2004.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorb SN, Filippov AE (2014) Fibrillar adhesion with no clusterisation: functional significance of material gradient along adhesive setae of insects. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:837–846CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosline J, Lillie M, Carrington E, Guerette P, Ortlepp C, Savage K (2002) Elastic proteins: biological roles and mechanical properties. Phil Trans R Soc B 357:121–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Haas F, Gorb S, Wootton RJ (2000a) Elastic joints in dermapteran hind wings: materials and wing folding. Arthr Str Dev 29:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haas F, Gorb S, Blickhan R (2000b) The function of resilin in beetle wings. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1375–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu Y, Zhao X, Vlassak JJ, Suo Z (2010) Using indentation to characterize the poroelasticity of gels. Appl Phys Lett 96:121904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen M, Weis-Fogh T (1962) Biology and physics of locust flight. V. Strength and elasticity of locust cuticle. Phil Trans R Soc B 254:137–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kothari VK, Rajkhowa R, Gupta VB (2001) Stress relaxation and inverse stress relaxation in silk fibers. J Appl Polymer Sci 82:1147–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kürschner S, Filippov AE (2012) Normal contact between a rigid surface and a viscous body: verification of the method of reduction of dimensionality for viscous media. Fiz Mezomekh 15(4):25–30Google Scholar
  22. Lombardi EC, Kaplan DL (1993) Preliminary characterization of resilin isolated from the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 292:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyons RE, Nairn KM, Huson MG, Kim M, Dumsday G, Elvin CM (2009) Comparisons of recombinant resilin-like proteins: repetitive domains are sufficient to confer resilin-like properties. Biomacromolecules 10:3009–3014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Michels J, Appel E, Gorb SN (2016) Functional diversity of resilin in Arthropoda. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 7:1241–1259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Misak HE, Sabelkin V, Miller L, Asmatulu R, Mall S (2013) Creep and inverse stress relaxation behaviors of carbon nanotube yarns. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13:8331–8339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peisker H, Michels J, Gorb SN (2013) Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata. Nat Comm 4:1661.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Persson BNJ, Kovalev A, Gorbb SN (2017) Simple contact mechanics model of the vertebrate cartilage. Soft Matter 13:6349–6362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pohrt R, Popov VL, Filippov AE (2012) Normal contact stiffness of elastic solids with fractal rough surfaces for one- and three-dimensional systems. Phys Rev E 86:026710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Popov VL (2010) Kontaktmechanik und Reibung: Von der Nanotribologie bis zur Erdbebendynamik. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Popov VL, Filippov AE (2012) Adhesive properties of contacts between elastic bodies with randomly rough self-affine surfaces: a simulation with the method of reduction of dimensionality. Phys Mesomech 15:324–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qin G, Hu X, Cebe P, Kaplan DL (2012) Mechanism of resilin elasticity. Nat Commun 3:1003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Santangelo PG, Roland CM (1992) Chain ends and the Mullins effect in rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 65:965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear regression. Wiley HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weis-Fogh T (1960) A rubber-like protein in insect cuticle. J Exp Biol 37:889–907Google Scholar
  35. Weis-Fogh T (1961) Thermodynamic properties of resilin, a rubber-like protein. J Mol Biol 3:520–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weng L, Chen X, Chen W (2007) Rheological characterization of in situ crosslinkable hydrogels formulated from oxidized dextran and N-carboxyethyl chitosan. Biomacromol 8:1109–11115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Functional Morphology and BiomechanicsZoological Institute of the Kiel UniversityKielGermany
  2. 2.Donetsk Institute for Physics and EngineeringNational Academy of ScienceDonetskUkraine

Personalised recommendations