Abstract
Metaphors convey unspoken emotions and perceptions by creatively applying an evocative concept from the source domain to illustrate some latent idea in the target domain. Prior research on nominal metaphor interpretation focused on identifying those properties of the source domain which are highly related to the target domain concepts to discover the most likely sense of the metaphor’s usage. In this paper, we bring forth a fresh perspective by observing that a metaphor is seldom without an emotion or sentiment; in fact, it is this very aspect which segregates it from its literal counterpart. We present an Emotion driven Metaphor Understanding system which assesses the affective dimensions of the source properties before assigning them as the most plausible sense in the context of the target domain. In our approach, we use the web as a knowledge source to identify properties of the source domain. We resolve the bottleneck of non-availability of informative emotion lexicons using pre-trained word2vec embeddings to extract the latent emotions in the source domain properties. Adopting an unsupervised learning approach on a dataset of nominal metaphors, we demonstrate that in comparison with a single emotionless interpretation, a multi-sense interpretation of a metaphor using the gamut of emotions is more likely to provide a realistic presentation of its purport. We further demonstrate that an emotion driven interpretation is often preferred over an interpretation sans emotion. The results clearly indicate that it is beneficial to apply emotions for refining the process of metaphor understanding.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
http://afflatus.ucd.ie/sardonicus/tree.jsp?noun=peach. Accessed on Sept. 10, 2017.
https://goo.gl/SXyoRd. Accessed on Nov 10, 2017.
Yandex Search Engine: www.yandex.com.
Available under Resources: http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~mihalcea/affectivetext/.
References
Bergmann, M.: Metaphor and formal semantic theory. Poetics 8(1–2), 213–230 (1979)
Fainsilber, L., Ortony, A.: Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor. Symb. 2(4), 239–250 (1987)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2008)
Kövecses, Z.: Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Kintsch, W.: Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7(2), 257–266 (2000)
Chang, S., Huang, S., Chen, Y.: Automatic detection and interpretation of nominal metaphor based on the theory of meaning. Neurocomputing 219, 300–311 (2017)
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, Nevada, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)
Rai, S., Chakraverty, S.: Metaphor detection using fuzzy rough sets. In: International joint conference on rough sets, Springer, Olsztyn, pp. 271–279 (2017)
Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. (1932)
Gibbs, Jr., R.W.: The dynamic complexities of metaphor interpretation. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 26(SPE):657–677 (2010)
Samur, D., Lai, V.T., Hagoort, P., Willems, R.M.: Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia 78, 108–114 (2015)
Davitz, J.R.: The Language of Emotion. Academic Press, Singapore (2016)
Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)
Martin, J.H.: A corpus-based analysis of context effects on metaphor comprehension. Trends Linguist. Stud. Monogr 171, 214 (2006)
Veale, T., Hao, Y.: A fluid knowledge representation for understanding and generating creative metaphors. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computational linguistics-volume 1, Manchester, pp. 945–952, Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)
Chang, S., Tian, J., Chen, Y.: Latent semantic similarity based interpretation of Chinese metaphors. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 48, 188–203 (2016)
Xiao, P., Alnajjar, K., Granroth-Wilding, M., Agres, K., Toivonen, H.: Meta4meaning: automatic metaphor interpretation using corpus-derived word associations. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computational creativity (ICCC), Paris (2016)
Dalgleish, T., Power, M.: Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley, Amsterdam (2000)
Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on computational approaches to analysis and generation of emotion in text, Los Angeles, pp. 26–34, Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Comput. Intell. 29(3), 436–465 (2013)
Strapparava, C., Valitutti, A. et al.: Wordnet affect: an affective extension of wordnet. In: LREC, vol. 4, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1083–1086 (2004)
Firth, J.R.: A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Stud. Linguist. Anal. (1957)
Pantel, P.. Inducing ontological co-occurrence vectors. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 125–132. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)
Zhang, D., Hua, X., Zengcai, S., Yunfeng, X.: Chinese comments sentiment classification based on word2vec and svm perf. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(4), 1857–1863 (2015)
Rai, S., Chakraverty, S., Tayal, D.K.: Supervised metaphor detection using conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, San Diego, CA, pp. 18–27 (2016). Association of Computational Linguistics
Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford corenlp natural language processing toolkit. In: ACL (System Demonstrations), Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 55–60 (2014)
Loper, E., Bird, S.: Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics, Vol. 1, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 63–70 (2002). Association for Computational Linguistics
Krijthe, J.: Rtsne: T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding using barnes-hut implementation. R package version 0.10 (2015). https://cran.r-project.org/package=Rtsne
van der Maaten, L., Hinton, G.: Visualizing data using t-sne. J. Mach. Learn. Res 9(Nov):2579–2605 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4 in appendix.
This section consists of table which provides different feasible senses for a set of metaphorical utterances.
About this article
Cite this article
Rai, S., Chakraverty, S., Tayal, D.K. et al. Understanding Metaphors Using Emotions. New Gener. Comput. 37, 5–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-018-0045-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-018-0045-3