Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Metaphors Using Emotions

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
New Generation Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metaphors convey unspoken emotions and perceptions by creatively applying an evocative concept from the source domain to illustrate some latent idea in the target domain. Prior research on nominal metaphor interpretation focused on identifying those properties of the source domain which are highly related to the target domain concepts to discover the most likely sense of the metaphor’s usage. In this paper, we bring forth a fresh perspective by observing that a metaphor is seldom without an emotion or sentiment; in fact, it is this very aspect which segregates it from its literal counterpart. We present an Emotion driven Metaphor Understanding system which assesses the affective dimensions of the source properties before assigning them as the most plausible sense in the context of the target domain. In our approach, we use the web as a knowledge source to identify properties of the source domain. We resolve the bottleneck of non-availability of informative emotion lexicons using pre-trained word2vec embeddings to extract the latent emotions in the source domain properties. Adopting an unsupervised learning approach on a dataset of nominal metaphors, we demonstrate that in comparison with a single emotionless interpretation, a multi-sense interpretation of a metaphor using the gamut of emotions is more likely to provide a realistic presentation of its purport. We further demonstrate that an emotion driven interpretation is often preferred over an interpretation sans emotion. The results clearly indicate that it is beneficial to apply emotions for refining the process of metaphor understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://afflatus.ucd.ie/sardonicus/tree.jsp.

  2. http://afflatus.ucd.ie/sardonicus/tree.jsp?noun=peach. Accessed on Sept. 10, 2017.

  3. http://afflatus.ucd.ie/sardonicus/tree.jsp.

  4. https://goo.gl/SXyoRd. Accessed on Nov 10, 2017.

  5. Yandex Search Engine: www.yandex.com.

  6. Available under Resources: http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~mihalcea/affectivetext/.

  7. https://www.ets.org/toefl.

References

  1. Bergmann, M.: Metaphor and formal semantic theory. Poetics 8(1–2), 213–230 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fainsilber, L., Ortony, A.: Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor. Symb. 2(4), 239–250 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kövecses, Z.: Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

  5. Kintsch, W.: Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7(2), 257–266 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, S., Huang, S., Chen, Y.: Automatic detection and interpretation of nominal metaphor based on the theory of meaning. Neurocomputing 219, 300–311 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, Nevada, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

  8. Rai, S., Chakraverty, S.: Metaphor detection using fuzzy rough sets. In: International joint conference on rough sets, Springer, Olsztyn, pp. 271–279 (2017)

  9. Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. (1932)

  10. Gibbs, Jr., R.W.: The dynamic complexities of metaphor interpretation. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 26(SPE):657–677 (2010)

  11. Samur, D., Lai, V.T., Hagoort, P., Willems, R.M.: Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia 78, 108–114 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davitz, J.R.: The Language of Emotion. Academic Press, Singapore (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, J.H.: A corpus-based analysis of context effects on metaphor comprehension. Trends Linguist. Stud. Monogr 171, 214 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veale, T., Hao, Y.: A fluid knowledge representation for understanding and generating creative metaphors. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computational linguistics-volume 1, Manchester, pp. 945–952, Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

  16. Chang, S., Tian, J., Chen, Y.: Latent semantic similarity based interpretation of Chinese metaphors. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 48, 188–203 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao, P., Alnajjar, K., Granroth-Wilding, M., Agres, K., Toivonen, H.: Meta4meaning: automatic metaphor interpretation using corpus-derived word associations. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computational creativity (ICCC), Paris (2016)

  18. Dalgleish, T., Power, M.: Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on computational approaches to analysis and generation of emotion in text, Los Angeles, pp. 26–34, Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

  20. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Comput. Intell. 29(3), 436–465 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Strapparava, C., Valitutti, A. et al.: Wordnet affect: an affective extension of wordnet. In: LREC, vol. 4, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1083–1086 (2004)

  22. Firth, J.R.: A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Stud. Linguist. Anal. (1957)

  23. Pantel, P.. Inducing ontological co-occurrence vectors. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 125–132. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)

  24. Zhang, D., Hua, X., Zengcai, S., Yunfeng, X.: Chinese comments sentiment classification based on word2vec and svm perf. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(4), 1857–1863 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rai, S., Chakraverty, S., Tayal, D.K.: Supervised metaphor detection using conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, San Diego, CA, pp. 18–27 (2016). Association of Computational Linguistics

  26. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford corenlp natural language processing toolkit. In: ACL (System Demonstrations), Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 55–60 (2014)

  27. Loper, E., Bird, S.: Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics, Vol. 1, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 63–70 (2002). Association for Computational Linguistics

  28. Krijthe, J.: Rtsne: T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding using barnes-hut implementation. R package version 0.10 (2015). https://cran.r-project.org/package=Rtsne

  29. van der Maaten, L., Hinton, G.: Visualizing data using t-sne. J. Mach. Learn. Res 9(Nov):2579–2605 (2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunny Rai.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4 in appendix.

This section consists of table which provides different feasible senses for a set of metaphorical utterances.

Table 4 Multiple interpretations along emotional aspects

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rai, S., Chakraverty, S., Tayal, D.K. et al. Understanding Metaphors Using Emotions. New Gener. Comput. 37, 5–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-018-0045-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-018-0045-3

Keywords

Navigation