Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 59:67 | Cite as

Filtered Rayleigh scattering mixing measurements of merging and non-merging streamwise vortex interactions in supersonic flow

  • Cody R. Ground
  • Vijay Gopal
  • Luca Maddalena
Research Article

Abstract

By introducing large-scale streamwise vortices into a supersonic flow it is possible to enhance the rate of mixing between two fluid streams. However, increased vorticity content alone does not explicitly serve as a predictor of mixing enhancement. Additional factors, particularly the mutual interactions occurring between neighboring vortical structures, affect the underlying fundamental physics that influence the rate at which the fluids mix. As part of a larger systematic study on supersonic streamwise vortex interactions, this work experimentally quantifies the average rate of mixing of helium and air in the presence of two separate modes of vortex interaction, the merging and non-merging of a pair of co-rotating vortices. In these experiments vortex-generating expansion ramps are placed on a strut injector. The freestream Mach number is set at 2.5 and helium is injected as a passive scalar. Average injectant mole fractions at selected flow planes downstream of the injector are measured utilizing the filtered Rayleigh scattering technique. The filtered Rayleigh scattering measurements reveal that, in the domain surveyed, the merging vortex interaction strongly displaces the plume from its initial horizontal orientation while the non-merging vortex interaction more rapidly mixes the helium and air. The results of the current experiments are consistent with associated knowledge derived from previous analyses of the two studied configurations which have included the detailed experimental characterization of entrainment, turbulent kinetic energy, and vorticity of both modes of vortex interaction.

References

  1. Benhassen F, Polanka MD, Reeder MF (2017) Trajectory measurements of a horizontally oriented buoyant jet in a coflow using filtered Rayleigh scattering. J Aerosp Eng 30:04016067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boguszko M, Elliot G (2005) On the use of filtered Rayleigh scattering for measurements in compressible flows and thermal fields. Exp Fluids 38:33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boguszko M, Elliot G (2005) Property measurement utilizing atomic/molecular filter-based diagnostics. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:93–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonatto JR, Marques W Jr (2005) Kinetic model analysis of light scattering in binary mixtures of monatomic ideal gases. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2005:P09014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doll U, Burow E, Stockhausen G, Willert C (2016) Methods to improve pressure, temperature, and velocity accuracies of filtered Rayleigh scattering measurements in gaseous flows. Meas Sci Technol 27:125204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot G, Glumac N, Carter C (2001) Molecular filtered Rayleigh scattering applied to combustion. Meas Sci Technol 12:452–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forkey JN, Finkelstein ND, Lempert WR, Miles RB (1996) Demonstration and characterization of filtered Rayleigh scattering for planar velocity measurements. AIAA J 34:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. George J, Jenkins T, Miles R (2014) Diagnosis of high speed flows using filtered Rayleigh scattering. In: 30th AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference. AIAA, Atlanta, pp 2014–2343Google Scholar
  9. George J, Jenkins T, Grady N, Sutton J, Rice B (2016) Simultaneous multi-property laser diagnostic for high speed flows using filtered Rayleigh scattering. In: 32nd AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference. AIAA, Washington, pp 2016–3119Google Scholar
  10. Ground C, Thumiah D, Maddalena L (2015) Design and application of filtered Rayleigh scattering experiments for mixing studies of new strut injectors for scramjets. In: 31st AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference. AIAA, Dallas, pp 2015–267Google Scholar
  11. Ground C, Maddalena L (2017) Visualization of supersonic turbulent vortical flows with filtered Rayleigh scattering. J Vis 20:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ground C, Vergine F, Maddalena L (2016) The effect of vortex merging and non-merging on the transfer of modal turbulent kinetic energy content. Exp Fluids 57:131CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gu Z, Ubachs W, Marques Jr W, van de Water W (2015) Rayleigh-Brillouin scattering in binary-gas mixtures. Phys Rev Lett 114:243902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustavsson JPR, Segal C (2005) Filtered Rayleigh scattering velocimetry-accuracy investigation in a M=2.2 axisymmetric jet. Exp Fluids 38:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussain AKMF (1983) Coherent structures-reality and myth. Phys Fluids 26:2816–2850Google Scholar
  16. Kearney SP, Schefer RW, Beresh SJ, Grasser TW (2005) Temperature imaging in nonpremixed flames by joint filtered Rayleigh and Raman scattering. Appl Opt 44:1548–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kutschenreuter P, Curran ET, Murthy SNB (2000) Supersonic flow combustors, in scramjet propulsion. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol 189. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, RestonGoogle Scholar
  18. Maddalena L, Vergine F, Crisanti M (2014) Vortex dynamics studies in supersonic flow: merging of co-rotating streamwise vortices. Phys Fluids 26:046101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maddalena L (2007) Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Miles R, Lempert W, Forkey J (1991) Instantaneous velocity fields and background suppression by filtered Rayleigh scattering. In: 29th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. AIAA, Reno, pp 91–0357Google Scholar
  21. Miles R, Lempert W, Forkey J (2001) Laser Rayleigh scattering. Meas Sci Technol 12:R33–R51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naughton JW, Cattafesta L, Settles GS (1992) Experiments on the enhancement of compressible mixing via streamwise vorticity part I—optical measurements. In: 28th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. AIAA, Nashville, pp 92–3549Google Scholar
  23. Ninnemann TA, Ng WF (1992) A concentration probe for the study of mixing in supersonic shear flows. Exp Fluids 13:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pan X (2003) Ph.D. thesis, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Qiu YJ (1992) Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  26. Seasholtz RG, Buggele AE (1997) Study of injection of helium into supersonic air flow using Rayleigh scattering. In: 35th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. AIAA, Reno, pp 97–0155Google Scholar
  27. Sutton JA, Driscoll JF (2004) Rayleigh scattering cross sections of combustion species at 266, 355, and 532 nm for thermometry applications. Opt Lett 29:2620–2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tenti G, Boley CD, Desai RC (1974) On the kinetic model description of Rayleigh–Brillouin scattering from molecular gases. Can J Phys 52:285–290Google Scholar
  29. Vergine F, Ground C, Maddalena L (2016) Turbulent kinetic energy decay in supersonic streamwise interacting vortices. J Fluid Mech 807:353–385MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Vergine F, Maddalena L (2015) Study of two streamwise vortex interactions in a Mach 2.5 flow: merging and no merging configurations. Phys Fluids 27:076102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vergine F, Maddalena L, Miller V, Gamba M (2015) Supersonic combustion of pylon-injected hydrogen in high-enthalpy flow with imposed vortex dynamics. J Propuls Power 31:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vieitez MO, van Duijn EJ, Ubachs W, Witchas B, Meijer A, de Wijn AS, Dam NJ, van de Water W (2010) Coherent and spontaneous Rayleigh–Brillouin scattering in atomic and molecular gases and gas mixtures. Phys Rev A 82:043836Google Scholar
  33. Waitz IA, Qiu YJ, Manning TA, Fung AKS, Elliot JK, Kerwin JM, Krasnodebski JK, O’Sullivan MN, Tew DE, Greitzer EM, Marble FE, Tan CS, Tillman TG (1997) Enhanced mixing with streamwise vorticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 33:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Witchas B, Vieitez MO, van Duijn EJ, Reitebuch O, van de Water W, Ubachs W (2010) Spontaneous Rayleigh-Brillouin scattering of ultraviolet light in nitrogen, dry air, and moist air. Appl Opt 49:4217–4227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zetterberg J, Li Z, Afzelius M, Aldén, (2008) Two-dimensional temperature measurements in flames using filtered Rayleigh scattering. Appl Spectrosc 62:778–783Google Scholar
  36. Zhu W, Ground C, Maddalena L, Viti V (2016) Computational study and error analysis of an integrated sampling-probe and gas-analyzer for mixing measurements in supersonic flow. Meas Sci Technol 27:095301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations