Initial clinical experience with the new thulium fiber laser: first 50 cases

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and laser settings of thulium fiber laser (TFL) in laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for ureteral and renal stones.

Methods

A prospective study of the first 50 patients with ureteral and renal stones who underwent RIRS using TFL (SOLTIVE Premium, Olympus, Japan) was performed. 200 and 150 µm laser fibers were used for ureteral and renal stones, respectively. Stone size, stone density, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings were recorded. We also assessed the ablation speed (mm3/s), laser power (W), and Joules/mm3 values for each lithotripsy.

Results

A total of 50 patients were included in the study with a median (IQR) age of 66 (55.5–74) years old for patients with ureteral stones and 55 (44–61.5) years old for patients with renal stones. Most of the patients had a Charlson comorbidity index score of 0. Median (IQR) stone volume for ureteral stones was 486 (332–1250) mm3 and for renal stones was 1800 (682.8–2760) mm3. Median (IQR) stone density for ureteral and renal stones was 998 (776–1300) HU and 1200 (750–1300) HU, respectively. Median (IQR) pulse energy for ureteral stones was 0.4 (0.2–0.4) J; and for renal stones, 0.3 (0.2–0.6) J.

Median pulse frequency, laser power, and laser operative time were higher in the renal stones group. The overall complication rate was low in both groups.

Conclusion

TFL is a safe and effective modality for lithotripsy during RIRS with minimal complication rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Fried NM, Irby PB (2018) Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 15(9):563–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0035-8

  2. 2.

    Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World Journal of Urology. Springer Verlag; 2019.

  3. 3.

    Hardy LA, Wilson CR, Irby PB, Fried NM (2014) Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy in an in vitro ureter model. J Biomed Opt 19(12):128001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Panthier F, Doizi S, Gorny C, Berthe L, TRAXER O (2020) Impact of Laser Fiber Diameter and Irrigation Fluids on Induced Bubble Stream Dynamics With Thulium Fiber Laser: an in Vitro Study. J Endouro. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0766

  5. 5.

    Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2019) The laser of thefuture: reality and expectationsaboutthe new thuliumfiber laser-a systematicreview. TranslAndrolUrol [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.08.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kronenberg P, Traxer O. The laser of the future: Reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review [Internet]. Translational Andrology and Urology. AME Publishing Company; 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 15]. 8: S398–417. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656746

  8. 8.

    Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O. What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation. World J Urol [Internet]. 2020 Apr 8 [cited 2021 Jan 7];1–8. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-020-03178-z

  9. 9.

    Weiss B, Shah O. Evaluation of dusting versus basketing-can new technologies improve stone-free rates? [Internet]. Nature Reviews Urology. Nature Publishing Group; 2016 [cited 2021 Jan 7]. 13: 726–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27698400/

  10. 10.

    Doizi S, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O. Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean? [Internet]. Nature Reviews Urology. Nature Publishing Group; 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 7]. 15: 653–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29921906/

  11. 11.

    Talso M, Emiliani E, Haddad M, Berthe L, Baghdadi M, Montanari E, et al. Laser fiber and flexible ureterorenoscopy: The safety distance concept [Internet]. Journal of Endourology. Mary Ann Liebert Inc.; 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 1]. 30: 1269–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27733053

  12. 12.

    Olympus Launches the Soltive SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser System for Urology | Olympus America | Medical [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 13]. Available from: https://medical.olympusamerica.com/articles/olympus-launches-soltive-superpulsed-thulium-fiber-laser-system-urology

  13. 13.

    Urol TJ, Schembri M, Sahu J, Aboumarzouk O, Pietropaolo A, Somani BK. Invited Review ENDOUROLOGY Thulium fiber laser: The new kid on the block. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 15]; Available from: www.turkishjournalofurology.com

  14. 14.

    Dymov A, Rapoport L, Tsarichenko D, Enikeev D, Sorokin N, Akopyan G et al (2019) PD01-06 Prospective clinical study on superpulse thulium fiber laser: initial analysis of optimal laser settings. Am UrolAssocEduc Res 201(4):2019

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fried NM (2018) Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 9(9):4552

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O. Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? World J Urol [Internet]. 2020 May 3 [cited 2020 Nov 13]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-020-03217-9

  17. 17.

    Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Klimov R, Inoyatov J, Azilgareeva C, Ali S et al (2020) Superpulsed thulium fiber laser for stone dusting: in search of a perfect ablation regimen—a prospective single-center study. J Endourol 34(11):1175–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hardy LA, Kennedy JD, Wilson CR, Irby PB, Fried NM. Analysis of thulium fiber laser induced bubble dynamics for ablation of kidney stones. J Biophotonics [Internet]. 2017 Oct 1 [cited 2020 Mar 16];10(10):1240–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507305

  19. 19.

    Traxer* O, De Coninck V, Keller EX, Doizi S (2019) MP17-03 comparing short, long, and moses regimes of ho: yag laser vs super pulse tm fiber laser in vitro: ablation speed and retropulsion effect. J Urol 201(Supplement 4). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000555428.84425.1d

  20. 20.

    Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Gorgen ARH, Panthier F, Doizi S, Traxer O (2020) How do weassesstheefficacy of Ho:YAGlow-power laser lithotripsyforthetreatment of uppertracturinarystones? IntroducingtheJoules/mm3 and laser activityconcepts. World J Urol [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03241-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kronenberg P, Somani B. Advances in Lasers for the Treatment of Stones—a Systematic Review. Curr Urol Rep 9(6):45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0807-y

Download references

Funding

This is an independent study and is not funded by any external body.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MC: Data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. OT: protocol/project development, and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Traxer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Prof. Olivier Traxer is a consultant for Coloplast, Rocamed, Olympus, EMS, Boston Scientific and IPG.

Research involving human participants, their data or biological material

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Tenon Hospital. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to the surgery, when interviewed with the patient in the Urology service.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 1 and 2.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corrales, M., Traxer, O. Initial clinical experience with the new thulium fiber laser: first 50 cases. World J Urol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03616-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Thulium fiber laser
  • Urolithiasis
  • Urinary stones
  • Kidney
  • Ureter
  • RIRS