The aim of this study was to investigate whether structured reports (SRs) of prostate MRI results are more suitable than non-structured reports (NSRs) for promoting the more accurate assessment of the location of a single prostate cancer lesion by novices in MRI-targeted biopsy.
50 NSRs and 50 SRs describing a single prostatic lesion were presented to 5 novices in MRI-targeted biopsy. The participants were asked to plot the tumor location in a two-dimensional prostate diagram and to answer a questionnaire on the quality of the reports. The accuracy of the plotted tumor position was evaluated with a validated 30-point scoring system that distinguished between “major” and “minor” mistakes.
The overall mean score for the accuracy of the tumor plotting was significantly higher for SRs than for NSRs (26.4 vs. 20.7, p < 0.01). The mean numbers of major (1.4 vs. 0.48, p < 0.01) and minor (3.05 vs. 1.15, p < 0.01) mistakes were significantly higher for NSRs than for SRs. Compared with NSRs, SRs received significantly higher ratings for the perceived quality of the summary (4.0 vs. 2.4, p < 0.01) as well as for the overall satisfaction with the report (4.1 vs. 2.1, p < 0.01).
Novices in MRI-targeted biopsy prefer structured reporting of prostate MRI as an information tool. SRs allow for a more accurate assessment of the location of single prostate cancer lesions. Therefore, structured reporting of prostate MRI may help to foster the learning process of novices in MRI-targeted biopsy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M, Group Ps (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389(10071):815–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
Ganeshan D, Duong PT, Probyn L, Lenchik L, McArthur TA, Retrouvey M, Ghobadi EH, Desouches SL, Pastel D, Francis IR (2018) Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol 25(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005
Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H (2011) Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260(1):174–181. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101913
James JT (2013) A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf 9(3):122–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69
Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ, European Society of Urogenital R (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
Magnetta MJ, Donovan AL, Jacobs BL, Davies BJ, Furlan A (2018) Evidence-based reporting: a method to optimize prostate MRI communications with referring physicians. Am J Roentgenol 210(1):108–112. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18260
Gassenmaier S, Armbruster M, Haasters F, Helfen T, Henzler T, Alibek S, Pforringer D, Sommer WH, Sommer NN (2017) Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder—improvement of report quality? Eur Radiol 27(10):4110–4119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4778-z
Franconeri A, Fang J, Carney B, Justaniah A, Miller L, Hur HC, King LP, Alammari R, Faintuch S, Mortele KJ, Brook OR (2017) Structured vs narrative reporting of pelvic MRI for fibroids: clarity and impact on treatment planning. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5161-9
Westhoff N, Siegel F, Peter C, Hetjens S, Porubsky S, Martini T, von Hardenberg J, Michel MS, Budjan J, Ritter M (2019) Defining the target prior to prostate fusion biopsy: the effect of MRI reporting on cancer detection. World J Urol 37(2):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2400-x
Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S, Emberton M, Futterer JJ, Gill IS, Grubb Iii RL, Hadaschik B, Klotz L, Margolis DJ, Marks LS, Melamed J, Oto A, Palmer SL, Pinto P, Puech P, Punwani S, Rosenkrantz AB, Schoots IG, Simon R, Taneja SS, Turkbey B, Ukimura O, van der Meulen J, Villers A, Watanabe Y, Consortium S (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol 64(4):544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.030
Ebbing J, Jaderling F, Collins JW, Akre O, Carlsson S, Hoijer J, Olsson MJ, Wiklund PN (2018) Comparison of 3D printed prostate models with standard radiological information to aid understanding of the precise location of prostate cancer: a construct validation study. PLoS One 13(6):e0199477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199477
Wetterauer C, Winkel DJ, Federer-Gsponer JR, Halla A, Subotic S, Deckart A, Seifert HH, Boll DT, Ebbing J (2019) Structured reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication. PLoS One 14(2):e0212444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212444
Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, D’Haese J, Rentsch M, Kolben T, Schreyer A, Rist C, Reiser M, Armbruster M (2017) Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer: potential benefits for surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication. Invest Radiol 52(4):232–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000336
Locketz GD, Lui JT, Chan S, Salisbury K, Dort JC, Youngblood P, Blevins NH (2017) Anatomy-specific virtual reality simulation in temporal bone dissection: perceived utility and impact on surgeon confidence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156(6):1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817691474
Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ (2014) Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 27(5):581–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9699-7
We thank Selina Ackermann from the University Hospital Basel for the editorial assistance.
Conflict of interest
This work was supported by the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Basel.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wetterauer, C., Winkel, D.J., Federer-Gsponer, J.R. et al. Novices in MRI-targeted prostate biopsy benefit from structured reporting of MRI findings. World J Urol 38, 1729–1734 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02953-x
- Prostate cancer
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- Structured report
- MRI-targeted biopsy