En bloc greenlight laser enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP): about the first hundred cases

A Commentary to this article is available



To report the functional outcomes, perioperative morbidity and surgical learning curve key points using “en bloc” greenlight enucleation of prostate (EB-GreenLEP) for patients with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).


Between December, 2015 and May, 2018, all consecutive patients with refractory LUTS due to BPH in our institution were included and underwent EB-GreenLEP by a single surgeon. Perioperative data, complications and functional outcomes at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups were collected and retrospectively analyzed.


One hundred patients were included whose median age was 69 years. The median prostate volume (PV) was 84 mL and median enucleated PV was 45.5 mL. Mean irrigation, catheterization and hospitalization times were 1.3, 1.4 and 1.6 days, respectively. Average follow-up was 9.3 months. A single high-grade Clavien-Dindo complication occurred. No urinary retention was reported. Two conversions to conventional resection of the prostate were noted. Three patients had postoperative urinary incontinence at 6 months, only one at 1 year (1%). At 1, 6 and 12 months, there was a significant improvement in IPSS score, QoL and Qmax. Enucleation and energy efficiency ratios were shorter after the 30th procedure. We demonstrated a linear correlation between enucleation time and PV (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001).


Our study shows that the mid-term functional results of EB-GreenLEP are comparable to other laser sources for the endoscopic enucleation of the prostate but with a shorter learning curve. We showed that, with (a) low rates of complications and a short hospital stay, EB-GreenLEP can manage medium-size glands (60–90 mL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    Robert G, De La Taille A, Descazeaud A (2018) Epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prog En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 28(15):803–812

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    de la Taille A, Robert G, Descazeaud A (2018) Consequences of prostatic obstruction on bladder function, impact of removal, and management of recurrence after surgery. Prog En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 28(15):813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gravas S, Bach T, Bachmann A, Drake M, Gacci M, Gratzke C, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Tikkinen KAO (2018) Management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. EAU Guidelines. Edition presented at the EAU Annual Congress Barcelona 2019. ISBN 978-94-92671-04-2. Uroweb. http://www.uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/

  4. 4.

    Robert G, de la Taille A, Descazeaud A (2018) Surgical treatment of BPO: standard and innovations. Prog En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 28(15):856–867

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Glybochko PV, Alyaev YG, Rapoport LM, Enikeev DV, Okhunov Z, Netsch C, Spivak LG, Taratkin MS (2018) Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a short term trend or a new treatment standard? Urologiia (2):130–133

  6. 6.

    Robert G, Cornu J-N, Fourmarier M, Saussine C, Descazeaud A, Azzouzi A-R et al (2016) Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 117(3):495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Peyronnet B, Robert G, Comat V, Rouprêt M, Gomez-Sancha F, Cornu J-N et al (2017) Learning curves and perioperative outcomes after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a comparison between GreenLight 532-nm and holmium lasers. World J Urol 35(6):973–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gomez Sancha F, Rivera VC, Georgiev G, Botsevski A, Kotsev J, Herrmann T (2015) Common trend: move to enucleation-Is there a case for GreenLight enucleation? Development and description of the technique. World J Urol 33(4):539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR (2012) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU Int 109(3):408–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53(1):160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ahyai SA, Lehrich K, Kuntz RM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 52(5):1456–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, Okhunov Z, O’Leary M, Potoldykova N et al (2018) Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol 18(1):87

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gu M, Chen Y-B, Liu C, Wan X, Cai Z-K, Chen Q et al (2018) Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic resection of prostate: a randomized trial with 72-month follow-up. J Endourol 32(2):139–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Misraï V, Pasquie M, Bordier B, Elman B, Lhez JM, Guillotreau J et al (2018) Comparison between open simple prostatectomy and green laser enucleation of the prostate for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-centre experience. World J Urol 36(5):793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Marchioni M, Cindolo L, Di Nicola M, Schips L, De Sio M, Lima E, Mirone V, Cormio L, Liatsikos E, Porpiglia F, Autorino R, EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) Research Group (2019) Major acute cardiovascular events after transurethral prostate surgery: a population-based analysis. Urology 131:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.014

  16. 16.

    Cho MC, Park JH, Jeong MS, Yi J-S, Ku JH, Oh S-J et al (2011) Predictor of de novo urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Neurourol Urodyn 30(7):1343–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Elkoushy MA, Elshal AM, Elhilali MM (2015) Reoperation after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: assessment of risk factors with time to event analysis. J Endourol 29(7):797–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hamid D, Casnedi S (2016) Tissue effect of Greenlight(®) laser on uterine fibroids. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 45(2):124–128

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cindolo L, Ruggera L, Destefanis P, Dadone C, Ferrari G (2017) Vaporize, anatomically vaporize or enucleate the prostate? The flexible use of the Greenlight laser. Int Urol Nephrol 49(3):405–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1494-6(Epub 2017 Jan 2)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Panthier.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panthier, F., Pasquier, J., Bruel, S. et al. En bloc greenlight laser enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP): about the first hundred cases. World J Urol 38, 1545–1553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02941-1

Download citation


  • Greenlight
  • Laser
  • Enucleation
  • Prostate
  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • Learning curve