Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study
- 106 Downloads
The extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) remains the most common first line of treatment for renal stones in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of the ESWL and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL).
Patients and methods
A total of 108 patients younger than 12 years of age with 1–2 cm single renal stone (pelvic or calyceal) were randomized into two groups, each containing 54 patients. Patients in group A were subjected to mini-PCNL using 16.5 Fr percutaneous sheath while those in group B underwent ESWL using Dornier Compact Sigma.
The stone-free rate (SFR) after first session was 88.9% (48 cases) and 55.6% (30 cases) for groups A and B, respectively. The difference is highly statistically significant P = 0.006. Two patients (3.7%) in group A needed 2nd session of PCNL, while 18 patients (33.3%)in group B needed a 2nd session, of theses 18 patients six patients needed a 3rd session of ESWL. After the third session of ESWL and second look PCNL the stone-free rates were 92.59% (50 cases) and 88.89% (48 cases) for groups A and B, respectively, (P = 0.639), which is statistically insignificant. The mean hospital stay and fluoroscopy exposure were significantly longer in the mini-PCNL group. The complication rate in groups A and group B were (22.2%) and (14.8%), respectively, which is statistically insignificant (P = 0.484).
According to Clavien grade of complications mini-PCNL is a safe procedure, and after three session of ESWL, mini-PCNL has a similar stone-free rate with a lower retreatment rate. However, the mini-PCNL has more radiation exposure, and requires a longer hospital stay.
KeywordsMini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ESWL Extracorporeal shock wave lithotrips Pediatric renal stone Endourology
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet
Clinically insignificant residual fragments
Kidneys, ureters and bladder
AT Project development, Data management, Manuscript writing and editing; AF Project development, Data management; MS Project development, Data management; MM Project development, Data management; DM Project development, Data management; MH Data collection, Data analysis; HA Project development, Data management.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The research involving human participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The study was approved by the local ethical committee of the hospital.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Stamatiou KN, Heretis I, Takos D, Papadimitriou V, Sofras F (2010) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric urolithiasis: a single institution experience, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece. Int Braz J Urol 36:724–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Guven S, Istanbulluoglu O, Gul U, Ozturk A, Celik H, Aygun C, Ozdemir U, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H, Kilinc M (2011) Successful percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: multicenter study on current status of its use, efficacy and complications using Clavien classification. J Urol 185:1419–1424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Karatag T, Tepeler A, Silay MS, Bodakci MN, Buldu I, Daggulli M, Hatipoglu NK, Istanbulluoglu MO, Armagan A (2015) A comparison of 2 percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones of sizes 10–20 mm: microperc vs miniperc. Urology 85(5):1015–1018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.El-Sheemy MS, Daw K, Habib E, Aboulela W, Fathy H, Shouman AM, El Ghoneimy M, Shoukry AI, Morsi HA, Badawy H (2016) Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: a comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, Division of Pediatric Urology, Aboul-Riche Children’s Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Int J Urol 23(7):564–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Tze MW, Kidger L, Kennish S, Irving H, Najmaldin A (2013) MINI PCNL in a pediatric population. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:249–254Google Scholar
- 29.Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar R, Jha SK, Singh H (2015) A single center experience comparing miniperc and Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of radioopaque 1–2 cm lower calyceal renal calculi in children: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol 29:805–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Onal B, Dogan HS, Satar N, Bilen CY, Güneş A, Ozden E (2014) Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis by the pediatric stone disease study group of the Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol 191(3):777–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar