Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incremental value of transition zone and midline apical biopsy at baseline TRUS-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the diagnostic yield of transition zone (TZB) and midline apical biopsies (MAB) in baseline transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies and to establish whether TZB and MAB for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) add clinical relevant information.

Methods

We performed baseline 9-core TRUS-guided biopsy in 412 consecutive subjects using sextant biopsies of the PZ (PZB), with an additional TZB on either side and a MAB at the prostatic apex. We determined the incremental diagnostic value of additional TZB an MAB to sextant PZB.

Results

Within a cohort of 412 patients with a median PSA of 7.5 ng/ml, 178 (43.2 %) patients were diagnosed with PCa upon baseline TRUS-guided biopsies. In 102 cases, at least one TZB was positive for PCa, with 6/412 (1.4 %) cases displaying PCa in the TZB only. MAB alone was positive for PCa in 4/412 (1.0 %) cases. One case (1/412; 0.2 %) had only a TZB and a MAB positive for PCa without positive PZB. Thus, 11/412 (2.7 %) of cases would not have been diagnosed with PCa at baseline TRUS-guided biopsy had only sextant PZ biopsy been performed. TZB detected a high-grade Gleason component (Gleason 4 and/or 5) not present in the PZB in 2.4 % of PCa cases.

Conclusions

There is limited value for TZB and MAB in the context of sextant PZB at baseline TRUS-guided biopsies for PCa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A et al (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63(2):214–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chun FK, Epstein JI, Ficarra V et al (2010) Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 58(6):851–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reissigl A, Pointner J, Strasser H et al (1997) Frequency and clinical significance of transition zone cancer in prostate cancer screening. Prostate 30(2):130–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guichard G, Larré S, Gallina A et al (2007) Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 52(2):430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pelzer AE, Bektic J, Berger AP et al (2005) Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the Tyrol screening project. Eur Urol 48(6):916–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. King CR, Ferrari M, Brooks JD et al (2009) Prognostic significance of prostate cancer originating from the transition zone. Urol Oncol 27(6):592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakai I, Harada K, Kurahashi T et al (2006) Analysis of differences in clinicopathological features between prostate cancers located in the transition and peripheral zones. Int J Urol 13(4):368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ouzaid I, Xylinas E, Campeggi A et al. (2011) Contemporary pathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of prostate cancers missed by 6- and 12-core biopsy and diagnosed with a 21-core biopsy protocol. World J Urol [Epub ahead of print]

  9. Al-Ahmadie HA, Tickoo SK, Olgac S et al (2008) Anterior-predominant prostatic tumors: zone of origin and pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol 32(2):229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Augustin H, Erbersdobler A, Graefen M et al (2003) Differences in biopsy features between prostate cancers located in the transition and peripheral zone. BJU Int 91(6):477–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis JW, Kim J, Ward JF et al (2010) Radical prostatectomy findings in patients predicted to have low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer diagnosed by extended-core biopsies: an analysis of volume and zonal distribution of tumour foci. BJU Int 105(10):1386–1391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soos G, Tsakiris I, Szanto J et al (2005) The prevalence of prostate carcinoma and its precursor in Hungary: an autopsy study. Eur Urol 48(5):739–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nevoux P, Ouzzane A, Ahmed HU et al (2012) Quantitative tissue analyses of prostate cancer foci in an unselected cystoprostatectomy series. BJU Int 110(4):517–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB et al (2005) ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fink KG, Hutarew G, Esterbauer B et al (2003) Evaluation of transition zone and lateral sextant biopsies for prostate cancer detection after initial sextant biopsy. Urology 61(4):748–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Sauvageot J et al (1997) Use of repeat sextant and transition zone biopsies for assessing extent of prostate cancer. J Urol 158(5):1886–1890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Djavan B, Mazal P, Zlotta A et al (2001) Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European prostate cancer detection study. Prostate 47(2):111–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De la Rosette JJ, Wink MH, Mamoulakis C et al (2009) Optimizing prostate cancer detection: 8 versus 12-core biopsy protocol. J Urol 182(4):1329–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dimmen M, Vlatkovic L, Hole KH et al (2012) Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies. BJU Int 110(2 Pt 2):E69–E75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel V, Merrick GS, Allen ZA et al (2011) The incidence of transition zone prostate cancer diagnosed by transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy: implications for treatment planning. Urology 77(5):1148–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J et al (2012) High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 110(7):993–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Satoh T, Matsumoto K, Fujita T et al (2005) Cancer core distribution in patients diagnosed by extended transperineal prostate biopsy. Urology 66(1):114–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U et al (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 50(4):738–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 183(2):520–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG et al (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 62(5):902–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roethke M, Anastasiadis AG, Lichy M et al (2012) MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J Urol 30(2):213–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Presti JC, O’Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW (2003) Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 169(1):125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Haarer CF, Gopalan A, Tickoo SK et al (2009) Prostatic transition zone directed needle biopsies uncommonly sample clinically relevant transition zone tumors. J Urol 182(4):1337–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ouzzane A, Puech P, Lemaitre L et al (2011) Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology 78(6):1356–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moussa AS, Meshref A, Schoenfield L et al (2010) Importance of additional “extreme” anterior apical needle biopsies in the initial detection of prostate cancer. Urology 75(5):1034–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Somford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Somford, D.M., Vreuls, W., Jansen, T.S. et al. Incremental value of transition zone and midline apical biopsy at baseline TRUS-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection. World J Urol 32, 461–467 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1130-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1130-3

Keywords

Navigation