Abstract
Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR), a powerful and efficient means of rapidly comparing gene expression between experimental conditions, is routinely used as a phenotyping tool in developmental biology. The accurate comparison of gene expression across multiple embryonic stages requires normalisation to reference genes that have stable expression across the time points to be examined. As the embryo and its constituent tissues undergo rapid growth and differentiation during development, reference genes known to be stable across some time points cannot be assumed to be stable across all developmental stages. The immediate post-implantation events of gastrulation and patterning are characterised by a rapid expansion in cell number and increasing specialisation of cells. The optimal reference genes for comparative gene expression studies at these specific stages have not been experimentally identified. In this study, the expression of five commonly used reference genes (H2afz, Ubc, Actb, Tbp and Gapdh) was measured across murine gastrulation and patterning (6.5–9.5 dpc) and analysed with the normalisation tools geNorm, Bestkeeper and Normfinder. The results, validated by RT-qPCR analysis of two genes with well-documented expression patterns across these stages, indicated the best strategy for RT-qPCR studies spanning murine gastrulation and patterning utilises the concurrent reference genes H2afz and Ubc.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64:5245–5250. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496
Arkell RM, Tam PPL (2012) Initiating head development in mouse embryos: integrating signalling and transcriptional activity. Open Biol 2:120030–120030. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.120030
Barratt KS, Glanville-Jones HC, Arkell RM (2014) The Zic2 gene directs the formation and function of node cilia to control cardiac situs. Genesis 52:626–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22767
Brown LY, Paraso M, Arkell RM, Brown S (2005) In vitro analysis of partial loss-of-function ZIC2 mutations in holoprosencephaly: alanine tract expansion modulates DNA binding and transactivation. Hum Mol Genet 14:411–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi037
Bustin S, Benes V, Garson J (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
Chapman JR, Waldenström J (2015) With reference to reference genes: a systematic review of endogenous controls in gene expression studies. PLoS ONE 10:e0141853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141853
De Spiegelaere W, Dern-Wieloch J, Weigel R et al (2015) Reference gene validation for RT-qPCR, a note on different available software packages. PLoS ONE 10:e0122515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122515
Downs KM, Davies T (1993) Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118:1255–1266
Elms P, Siggers P, Napper D et al (2003) Zic2 is required for neural crest formation and hindbrain patterning during mouse development. Dev Biol 264:391–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.09.005
Elms P, Scurry A, Davies J et al (2004) Overlapping and distinct expression domains of Zic2 and Zic3 during mouse gastrulation. Gene Expr Patterns 4:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modgep.2004.03.003
Guenin S, Mauriat M, Pelloux J et al (2009) Normalization of qRT-PCR data: the necessity of adopting a systematic, experimental conditions-specific, validation of references. J Exp Bot 60:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern305
Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A et al (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8:R19. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19
Houtmeyers R, Souopgui J, Tejpar S, Arkell RM (2013) The ZIC gene family encodes multi-functional proteins essential for patterning and morphogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 70:3791–3811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1285-5
Hruz T, Wyss M, Docquier M et al (2011) RefGenes: identification of reliable and condition specific reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization. BMC Genomics 12:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-156
Kojima Y, Tam OH, Tam PPL (2014) Timing of developmental events in the early mouse embryo. Semin Cell Dev Biol 34:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEMCDB.2014.06.010
Kozera B, Rapacz M (2013) Reference genes in real-time PCR. J Appl Genet 54:391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-013-0173-x
Latham GJ (2010) Normalization of microRNA quantitative RT-PCR data in reduced scale experimental designs. In: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). pp 19–31
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Mamo S, Bodo S, Kobolak J et al (2006) Gene expression profiles of vitrified in vivo derived 8-cell stage mouse embryos detected by high density oligonucleotide microarrays. Mol Reprod Dev 73:1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20588
Mestdagh P, Van Vlierberghe P, De Weer A et al (2009) A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization. Genome Biol 10:R64. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r64
Mitiku N, Baker JC (2007) Genomic analysis of gastrulation and organogenesis in the mouse. Dev Cell 13:897–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.004
Nagai T, Aruga J, Takada S et al (1997) The expression of the mouse Zic1, Zic2, and Zic3 gene suggests an essential role for Zic genes in body pattern formation. Dev Biol 182:299–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1996.8449
Peng G, Suo S, Chen J et al (2016) Spatial transcriptome for the molecular annotation of lineage fates and cell identity in mid-gastrula mouse embryo. Dev Cell 36:681–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.020
Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26:509–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47
Snow MHL (1977) Gastrulation in the mouse: growth and regionalization of the epiblast. Development 42:293–303
Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F et al (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0034
Veazey KJ, Golding MC (2011) Selection of stable reference genes for quantitative rt-PCR comparisons of mouse embryonic and extra-embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 6:e27592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027592
Warr N, Powles-Glover N, Chappell A et al (2008) Zic2-associated holoprosencephaly is caused by a transient defect in the organizer region during gastrulation. Hum Mol Genet 17:2986–2996. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn197
Willems E, Mateizel I, Kemp C et al (2006) Selection of reference genes in mouse embryos and in differentiating human and mouse ES cells. Int J Dev Biol 50:627–635. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.052130ew
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Grant [#1126288 to R.M.A.].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures involving animals performed in this study were in accordance with The Australian National University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barratt, K.S., Diamand, K.E.M. & Arkell, R.M. Identification of reference genes suitable for RT-qPCR studies of murine gastrulation and patterning. Mamm Genome 29, 656–662 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-018-9769-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-018-9769-0