Coronary CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Standard-dose and low-dose imaging with a high-resolution whole-heart CT scanner
- 17 Downloads
To compare image quality, observer confidence, radiation exposure in the standard-dose (SD-CCTA) and low-dose (LD-CCTA) protocols of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Material and methods
CCTA was performed in 303 patients using a CT scanner with 16-cm coverage (111 scans during sinus rhythm (SR); 192 during AF). LD-CCTA was used in 218 patients; SD-CCTA in 85 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD). Image quality and observer confidence were evaluated on 5-point scales. Radiation doses were recorded.
Image quality was superior in the SD-CCTA compared to the LD-CCTA (SR 1.45±0.40; AF 1.72±0.46; vs. SR 1.83±0.48; AF 1.92±0.50; p < 0.001). Observers were more confident with SD-CCTA than with LD-CCTA (SR 1.38±0.33; AF 1.61±0.43; vs. SR 1.70±0.45; AF 1.82±0.50; p < 0.001). Radiation doses in AF were significantly higher than in the SR (LD-CCTA, 1.68±0.71 mSv; SD-CCTA, 3.72±1.95 mSv; vs. LD-CCTA, 1.3 ±0.52 mSv; SD-CCTA, 2.67±1.47 mSv; p < 0.001).
Using a low-dose protocol in AF, radiation exposure can be decreased by 50 % at the expense of 20 % impaired image quality. A low-dose CCTA protocol can be considered in young patients, whereas the standard-dose protocol is recommended for older patients and those suspected of having CAD.
• Whole-heart CT allows visualization of the coronary arteries in atrial fibrillation.
• Low-dose CT decreases radiation exposure by 50%, image quality by 20%.
• Standard-dose CT seems advantageous when concomitant coronary artery disease is suspected.
KeywordsAtrial fibrillation Coronary artery disease Coronary CT angiography Image quality Radiation exposure
Body mass index
Beats per minute
Coronary artery disease
Coronary computed tomography angiography
Dose length product
Dual-source computed tomography
Invasive coronary angiography
Left anterior descending artery
Left circumflex artery
Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography
Multidetector-row computed tomography
Pulmonary vein isolation
Right coronary artery
Standard-dose coronary computed tomography angiography
Single-source computed tomography
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Rainer R. Schmitt: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, 97616, Germany.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:
Rainer R. Schmitt has received a speaker honorarium from GE Healthcare and Bracco Diagnostics. Matthias Wagner has received a speaker honorarium from GE Healthcare. All other authors report no conflict of interest to disclose.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• diagnostic study
• performed at one institution
- 2.January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiolgy/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 130:199–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R et al (2012) 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 9:632–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864-1994Google Scholar
- 15.Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Am J Roentgenol 194:881–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lee AM, Beaudoin J, Engel LC et al (2013) Assessment of image quality and radiation dose of prospectively ECG-triggered adaptive dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) with arrhythmia rejection algorithm in systole versus diastole: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1361–1370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Di Cesare E, Gennarelli A, Di Sibio A et al (2015) Image quality and radiation dose of single heartbeat 640-slice coronary CT angiography: a comparison between patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and subjects in normal sinus rhythm by propensity analysis. Eur J Radiol 84:631–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wang Q, Qin J, He B et al (2013) Computed tomography coronary angiography with a consistent dose below 2 mSv using double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1341–1349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar