Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 3255–3262 | Cite as

Forensic age assessment by 3.0T MRI of the knee: proposal of a new MRI classification of ossification stages

  • Volker Vieth
  • Ronald Schulz
  • Walter Heindel
  • Heidi Pfeiffer
  • Boris Buerke
  • Andreas Schmeling
  • Christian Ottow
Forensic Medicine
  • 237 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the possibility of determining majority via a morphology-based examination of the epiphyseal-diaphyseal fusion by 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a prospective cross-sectional study developing and applying a new stage classification was conducted.

Materials and methods

344 male and 350 female volunteers of German nationality between the ages of 12-24 years were scanned between May 2013 and June 2015. A 3.0 T MRI scanner was used, acquiring a T1-weighted (T1-w) turbo spin-echo sequence (TSE) and a T2-weighted (T2-w) TSE sequence with fat suppression by spectral pre-saturation with inversion recovery (SPIR). The gathered information was sifted and a five-stage classification was formulated as a hypothesis. The images were then assessed using this classification. The relevant statistics were defined, the intra- and interobserver agreements were determined, and the differences between the sexes were analysed.

Results

The application of the new classification made it possible to correctly assess majority in both sexes by the examination of the epiphyses of the knee joint. The intra- and interobserver agreement levels were very good (κ > 0.80). The Mann-Whitney-U Test implied significant sex-related differences for most stages.

Conclusion

Applying the presented MRI classification, it is possible to determine the completion of the 18th year of life in either sex by 3.0 T MRI of the knee joint.

Key points

• Based on prospective referential data a new MRI classification was formulated.

• The setting allows assessment of the age of an individual’s skeletal development.

• The classification scheme allows the reliable determination of majority in both sexes.

• The staging shows a high reproducibility for instructed and trained professional personnel.

• The proposed classification is likely to be adaptable to other long bone epiphyses.

Keywords

Age determination by skeleton Forensic medicine Bone development Knee Magnetic resonance imaging 

Abbreviations

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

SPIR

Signal pre-saturation with inversion recovery

T1-w

T1-weighted

T2-w

T2-weighted

TSE

Turbo spin-echo

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the European Refugee Fund, the German Federal Office for Migration and Refugees and the Westphalian Wilhelms-University of Münster, Germany.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Andreas Schmeling.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in:

Ottow C, Krämer JA, Olze A, et al. Magnetresonanztomographiestudie zur Altersschätzung von unbegleiteten minderjährigen Flüchtlingen [Magnetic resonance tomography studies on age estimation of unaccompanied minor refugees]. Rechtsmedizin. 2014; 25(1):12-20.

Ottow C, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Heindel W, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2017) Forensic age estimation by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: the definite relevance in bony fusion of the distal femoral- and the proximal tibial epiphyses using closest-to-bone T1 TSE sequence. Eur Radiol 27:5041-5048

Guo Y, Olze A, Ottow C, et al. Dental age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of lower third molars. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(6):1265-70.

Timme M, Ottow C, Schulz R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis: a new criterion of maturity for determining whether the age of 18 has been completed? Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(2):579-84.

Methodology

• prospective

• cross-sectional study

• performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G (2016) Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113:44–50PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jayaraman J, Roberts GJ, Wong HM, McDonald F, King NM (2016) Ages of legal importance: Implications in relation to birth registration and age assessment practices. Med Sci Law 56:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmidt S, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A, Schulz R (2013) Sonographic examination of the apophysis of the iliac crest for forensic age estimation in living persons. Sci Justice 53:395–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt S, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A, Schulz R (2013) Age dependence of epiphyseal ossification of the distal radius in ultrasound diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 127:831–838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schulz R, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2013) Sonographic examination on the time frame of ossification of the distal fibula epiphysis. Arch Kriminol 231:156–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schulz R, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2013) Sonographic assessment of the ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis in 616 individuals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 9:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schulz R, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2014) Forensic age estimation in living subjects based on ultrasound examination of the ossification of the olecranon. J Forensic Leg Med 22:68–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulz R, Zwiesigk P, Schiborr M, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2008) Ultrasound studies on the time course of clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 122:163–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt S, Muhler M, Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Schulz R (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 121:321–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hillewig E, Degroote J, Van der Paelt T et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the sternal extremity of the clavicle in forensic age estimation: towards more sound age estimates. Int J Legal Med 127:677–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hillewig E, De Tobel J, Cuche O, Vandemaele P, Piette M, Verstraete K (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of the medial extremity of the clavicle in forensic bone age determination: a new four-minute approach. Eur Radiol 21:757–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vieth V, Schulz R, Brinkmeier P, Dvorak J, Schmeling A (2014) Age estimation in U-20 football players using 3.0 Tesla MRI of the clavicle. Forensic Sci Int 241:118–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dvorak J, George J, Junge A, Hodler J (2007) Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players. Br J Sports Med 41:45–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dvorak J, George J, Junge A, Hodler J (2007) Application of MRI of the wrist for age determination in international U-17 soccer competitions. Br J Sports Med 41:497–500CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Timme M, Dvorak J, Schmeling A (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging of the iliac crest: age estimation in under-20 soccer players. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:198–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dedouit F, Auriol J, Rousseau H, Rouge D, Crubezy E, Telmon N (2012) Age assessment by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int 217(232):e231–e237Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jopp ESI, Maas R, Adam G, Püschel K (2010) Proximale Tibiaepiphyse im Magnetresonanztomogramm. Neue Möglichkeit zur Altersbestimmung bei Lebenden? [Proximal tibial epiphysis in magnetic resonance imaging. New possibility for age estimation of living persons?]. Rechtsmedizin 20:464–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kramer JA, Schmidt S, Jurgens KU, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging to examine ossification of the proximal tibial epiphysis for forensic age estimation in living individuals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:306–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kramer JA, Schmidt S, Jurgens KU, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2014) Forensic age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of the distal femur. Int J Legal Med 128:509–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ottow C, Krämer JA, Olze A et al (2014) Magnetresonanztomographiestudie zur Altersschätzung von unbegleiteten minderjährigen Flüchtlingen [Magnetic resonance tomography studies on age estimation of unaccompanied minor refugees]. Rechtsmedizin 25:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tangmose S, Jensen KE, Villa C, Lynnerup N (2014) Forensic age estimation from the clavicle using 1.0T MRI--preliminary results. Forensic Sci Int 234:7–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terada Y, Kono S, Tamada D et al (2013) Skeletal age assessment in children using an open compact MRI system. Magn Reson Med 69:1697–1702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Muhler M, Wernecke KD, Geserick G (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118:5–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Demirjian A, Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Patterson DK (1985) Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental, and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod 88:433–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2010) Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med 124:321–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tomei E, Sartori A, Nissman D et al (2014) Value of MRI of the hand and the wrist in evaluation of bone age: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:1198–1205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ottow C, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Heindel W, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2017) Forensic age estimation by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: the definite relevance in bony fusion of the distal femoral- and the proximal tibial epiphyses using closest-to-bone T1 TSE sequence. Eur Radiol. 27:5041–5048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    (AGFAD) Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forensische Altersdiagnostik. uni-muenster.de/agfad_start.html. Accessed 02.27.2017 2017Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vieth V, Link TM, Lotter A et al (2001) Does the trabecular bone structure depicted by high-resolution MRI of the calcaneus reflect the true bone structure? Invest Radiol 36:210–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guo Y, Olze A, Ottow C et al (2015) Dental age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of lower third molars. Int J Legal Med 129:1265–1270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Timme M, Ottow C, Schulz R et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis: a new criterion of maturity for determining whether the age of 18 has been completed? Int J Legal Med 131:579–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saint-Martin P, Rerolle C, Pucheux J, Dedouit F, Telmon N (2015) Contribution of distal femur MRI to the determination of the 18-year limit in forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med 129:619–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G (2000) Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med 113:253–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schmeling A, Schulz R, Danner B, Rosing FW (2006) The impact of economic progress and modernization in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist. Int J Legal Med 120:121–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Clinical RadiologyUniversity Hospital MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Clinic for RadiologyKlinikum IbbenbürenIbbenbürenGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Legal MedicineUniversity Hospital MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations