Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 2194–2202 | Cite as

Preoperative short hookwire placement for small pulmonary lesions: evaluation of technical success and risk factors for initial placement failure

  • Toshihiro Iguchi
  • Takao Hiraki
  • Yusuke Matsui
  • Hiroyasu Fujiwara
  • Yoshihisa Masaoka
  • Takashi Tanaka
  • Takuya Sato
  • Hideo Gobara
  • Shinichi Toyooka
  • Susumu Kanazawa
Interventional

Abstract

Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the technical success of computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided short hookwire placement before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and to identify the risk factors for initial placement failure.

Methods

In total, 401 short hookwire placements for 401 lesions (mean diameter 9.3 mm) were reviewed. Technical success was defined as correct positioning of the hookwire. Possible risk factors for initial placement failure (i.e., requirement for placement of an additional hookwire or to abort the attempt) were evaluated using logistic regression analysis for all procedures, and for procedures performed via the conventional route separately.

Results

Of the 401 initial placements, 383 were successful and 18 failed. Short hookwires were finally placed for 399 of 401 lesions (99.5%). Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that in all 401 procedures only the transfissural approach was a significant independent predictor of initial placement failure (odds ratio, OR, 15.326; 95% confidence interval, CI, 5.429–43.267; p < 0.001) and for the 374 procedures performed via the conventional route only lesion size was a significant independent predictor of failure (OR 0.793, 95% CI 0.631–0.996; p = 0.046).

Conclusions

The technical success of preoperative short hookwire placement was extremely high. The transfissural approach was a predictor initial placement failure for all procedures and small lesion size was a predictor of initial placement failure for procedures performed via the conventional route.

Key points

• Technical success of preoperative short hookwire placement was extremely high.

• The transfissural approach was a significant independent predictor of initial placement failure for all procedures.

• Small lesion size was a significant independent predictor of initial placement failure for procedures performed via the conventional route.

Keywords

Lung Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery Pulmonary nodule Preoperative localization Interventional radiology 

Abbreviations

VATS

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

CT

Computed tomography

AE

Adverse event

VC

Vital capacity

FEV1

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

OR

Odds ratio

CI

Confidence interval

SD

Standard deviation

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Toshiharu Mitsuhashi for his assistance with the statistical analyses. The work was supported by the Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Susumu Kanazawa, Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Funding

The authors state that this work did not received any funding.

Statistics and biometry

Toshiharu Mitsuhashi kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.

Institution: Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital

Address: 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, kita-ku Okayama 700-8558, Japan

E-mail: mitsuh-t@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (approval no KEN1708-002).

Study subject or cohort overlap

Our previous study investigating the safety of the short hookwire placement procedure included 267 procedures (Eur Radiol 2016;26:114–121). The purpose of this study (i.e., evaluation of the technical success and risk factors for initial placement failure) differs from that of the previous study (i.e., evaluation of safety and risk factors for procedural pneumothorax). Additionally, the complications observed in one patient have been described in a previous case report (Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015;38:1346–1348).

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Burdine J, Joyce LD, Plunkett MB, Inampudi S, Kaye MG, Dunn DH (2002) Feasibility and value of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge excision of small pulmonary nodules in patients with malignancy. Chest 122:1467–1470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mun M, Kohno T (2007) Efficacy of thoracoscopic resection for multifocal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma showing pure ground-glass opacities of 20 mm or less in diameter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:877–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zaman M, Bilal H, Woo CY, Tang A (2012) In patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery excision, what is the best way to locate a subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodule in order to achieve successful excision? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 15:266–272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park CH, Han K, Hur J et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness and safety of preoperative lung localization for pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 151:316–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanazawa S, Ando A, Yasui K, Tanaka A, Hiraki Y (1995) Localization of small pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic resection: use of a newly developed hookwire system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18:122–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyoshi K, Toyooka S, Gobara H et al (2009) Clinical outcomes of short hook wire and suture marking system in thoracoscopic resection for pulmonary nodules. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36:378–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suzuki K, Shimohira M, Hashizume T et al (2014) Usefulness of CT-guided hookwire marking before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small pulmonary lesions. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 58:657–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ichinose J, Kohno T, Fujimori S, Harano T, Suzuki S (2013) Efficacy and complications of computed tomography-guided hook wire localization. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1203–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dendo S, Kanazawa S, Ando A et al (2002) Preoperative localization of small pulmonary lesions with a short hook wire and suture system: experience with 168 procedures. Radiology 225:511–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanazawa S, Ando A, Yasui K et al (1998) Localization of pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic resection: experience with a system using a short hookwire and suture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:332–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Gobara H et al (2016) CT fluoroscopy-guided preoperative short hook wire placement for small pulmonary lesions: evaluation of safety and identification of risk factors for pneumothorax. Eur Radiol 26:114–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshida Y, Inoh S, Murakawa T, Ota S, Fukayama M, Nakajima J (2011) Preoperative localization of small peripheral pulmonary nodules by percutaneous marking under computed tomography guidance. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 13:25–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Gobara H et al (2015) Simultaneous multiple preoperative localizations of small pulmonary lesions with a short hook wire and suture system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:971–976CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Gobara H, Fujiwara H, Yamamoto H, Kanazawa S (2015) Tension pneumopericardium as a complication of preoperative localization of a small pulmonary metastasis using a short hook wire and suture system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:1346–1348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brinkman GL, Coates EO Jr (1963) The effect of bronchitis, smoking, and occupation on ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 87:684–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenglinger FX, Schwarz CD, Artmann W (1994) Localization of pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery: value of percutaneous staining with methylene blue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:297–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shah RM, Spirn PW, Salazar AM et al (1993) Localization of peripheral pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic excision: value of CT-guided wire placement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:279–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Gobara H et al (2015) Transfissural route used for preoperative localization of small pulmonary lesions with a short hook wire and suture system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:222–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H et al (2009) CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of 1,000 pulmonary lesions performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles: diagnostic yield and risk factors for diagnostic failure. Chest 136:1612–1617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshihiro Iguchi
    • 1
  • Takao Hiraki
    • 1
  • Yusuke Matsui
    • 1
  • Hiroyasu Fujiwara
    • 1
  • Yoshihisa Masaoka
    • 1
  • Takashi Tanaka
    • 1
  • Takuya Sato
    • 2
  • Hideo Gobara
    • 1
  • Shinichi Toyooka
    • 3
  • Susumu Kanazawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyOkayama University Medical SchoolOkayamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyAko Central HospitalAkoJapan
  3. 3.Department of General Thoracic SurgeryOkayama University Medical SchoolOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations