Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors
- 299 Downloads
To determine the malignancy rate overall and for specific BI-RADS descriptors in women ≥70 years who undergo stereotactic biopsy for calcifications.
We retrospectively reviewed 14,577 consecutive mammogram reports in 6839 women ≥70 years to collect 231 stereotactic biopsies of calcifications in 215 women. Cases with missing images or histopathology and calcifications associated with masses, distortion, or asymmetries were excluded. Three breast radiologists determined BI-RADS descriptors by majority. Histology, hormone receptor status, and lymph node status were correlated with BI-RADS descriptors.
There were 131 (57 %) benign, 22 (10 %) atypia/lobular carcinomas in situ, 55 (24 %) ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 23 (10 %) invasive diagnoses. Twenty-seven (51 %) DCIS cases were high-grade. Five (22 %) invasive cases were high-grade, two (9 %) were triple-negative, and three (12 %) were node-positive. Malignancy was found in 49 % (50/103) of fine pleomorphic, 50 % (14/28) of fine linear, 25 % (10/40) of amorphous, 20 % (3/15) of round, 3 % (1/36) of coarse heterogeneous, and 0 % (0/9) of dystrophic calcifications.
Among women ≥70 years that underwent stereotactic biopsy for calcifications only, we observed a high rate of malignancy. Additionally, coarse heterogeneous calcifications may warrant a probable benign designation.
• Cancer rates of biopsied calcifications in women ≥70 years are high
• Radiologists should not dismiss suspicious calcifications in older women
• Coarse heterogeneous calcifications may warrant a probable benign designation
KeywordsStereotactic techniques Mammography Carcinoma, ductal, breast Carcinoma, intraductal noninfiltrating Calcifications
breast imaging reporting and data system
ductal carcinoma in situ
human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
lobular carcinoma in situ
United States Preventive Services Task Force
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Lars Grimm. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Methodology: retrospective, cross sectional study, performed at one institution.
- 8.Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D et al (2010) Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 7:18–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Breast cancer: screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Topic/recommendation-summary/breast-cancer-screening. Accessed 13 May 2015
- 12.ACOG Practice Advisory on Breast Cancer Screening. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Practice-Advisories/ACOG-Practice-Advisory-on-Breast-Cancer-Screening. Accessed 05 May 2015
- 19.Alvarado M, Ozanne E, Esserman L. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2012:e40–5Google Scholar
- 23.Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK et al (2013) BI-RADS: mammography. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM (eds) Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS – breast imaging atlas. 5th ed. American College of Radiology, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
- 24.Breast Cancer Staging 7th edition. American Cancer Society. https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Cancer%20Staging%20Poster%20Picture%20Library/BreastPoster1.jpg. Accessed 12 Oct 2014
- 26.Grimm LJ, Zhang J, Mazurowski MA (2015) Computational approach to radiogenomics of breast cancer: Luminal A and luminal B molecular subtypes are associated with imaging features on routine breast MRI extracted using computer vision algorithms. J Magn Reson Imaging 42(4):902–907Google Scholar
- 34.Actuarial Life Table. Social Security Administration. http://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html. Accessed 13 May 2015