European Radiology

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1971–1979 | Cite as

Non-invasive imaging of myocardial bridge by coronary computed tomography angiography: the value of transluminal attenuation gradient to predict significant dynamic compression

  • Yuehua Li
  • Mengmeng Yu
  • Jiayin Zhang
  • Minghua Li
  • Zhigang Lu
  • Meng Wei
Cardiac
  • 295 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

To study the diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG) measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for identifying relevant dynamic compression of myocardial bridge (MB).

Methods

Patients with confirmed MB who underwent both CCTA and ICA within one month were retrospectively included. TAG was defined as the linear regression coefficient between luminal attenuation and distance. The TAG of MB vessel, length and depth of MB were measured and correlated with the presence and degree of dynamic compression observed at ICA. Systolic compression ≧50 % was considered significant.

Results

302 patients with confirmed MB lesions were included. TAG was lowest (-17.4 ± 6.7 HU/10 mm) in patients with significant dynamic compression and highest in patients without MB compression (-9.5 ± 4.3 HU/10 mm, p < 0.001). Linear correlation revealed relation between the percentage of systolic compression and TAG (Pearson correlation, r = -0.52, p < 0.001) and no significant relation between the percentage of systolic compression and MB depth or length. ROC curve analysis determined the best cut-off value of TAG as -14.8HU/10 mm (area under curve = 0.813, 95 % confidence interval = 0.764-0.855, p < 0.001), which yielded high diagnostic accuracy (82.1 %, 248/302).

Conclusions

The degree of ICA-assessed systolic compression of MB significantly correlates with TAG but not MB depth or length.

Key Points

TAG is associated with the extent of dynamic compression of MB.

TAG is superior to depth and length for identifying dynamic compression.

Cut-off value of TAG as -14.8HU/10 mm yielded high predictive value.

Keywords

Coronary artery disease Computed tomography Myocardial bridge Coronary angiography Transluminal attenuation gradient 

Abbreviations and acronyms

CCTA

Coronary computed tomography angiography

CPR

Curved planar reformation

ICA

Invasive coronary angiography

LAD

Left anterior descending

MB

Myocardial bridge

PCI

Percutaneous coronary intervention

TAG

Transluminal attenuation gradient

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by National Development Project of Key Clinical Department. The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Jiayin Zhang. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. This study has received funding by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 81301219) and Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (Grant No.: 13ZR1431500). No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.

References

  1. 1.
    Geiringer E (1951) The mural coronary. Am Heart J 41:359–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J et al (2002) Update on myocardial bridging. Circulation 106:2616–2622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S et al (1998) The effects of a myocardial bridge on coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemia. J Pathol 185:4–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corban MT, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P et al (2014) Myocardial bridging: contemporary understanding of pathophysiology with implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2346–2355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berry JF, von Mering GO, Schmalfuss C et al (2002) Systolic compression of the left anterior descending coronary artery: a case series, review of the literature, and therapeutic options including stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 56:58–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gowda RM, Khan IA, Ansari AW et al (2003) Acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction from myocardial bridging of left anterior descending coronary artery. Int J Cardiol 90:117–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tio RA, Ebels T (2001) Ventricular septal rupture caused by myocardial bridging. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1369–1370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ural E, Bildirici U, Celikyurt U et al (2009) Long-term prognosis of noninterventionally followed patients with isolated myocardial bridge and severe systolic compression of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Clin Cardiol 32:454–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kodama K, Morioka N, Hara Y et al (1998) Coronary vasospasm at the site of myocardial bridged report of two cases. Angiology 49:659–663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tio RA, Van Gelder IC, Boonstra PW et al (1997) Myocardial bridging in a survivor of sudden cardiac near-death: role of intracoronary doppler flow measurements and angiography during dobutamine stress in the clinical evaluation. Heart 77:280–282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morales AR, Romanelli R, Boucek RJ (1980) The mural left anterior descending coronary artery, strenuous exercise and sudden death. Circulation 62:230–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L et al (2008) Myocardial bridging: depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography--comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Radiology 246:754–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim PJ, Hur G, Kim SY et al (2009) Frequency of myocardial bridges and dynamic compression of epicardial coronary arteries: a comparison between computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography. Circulation 119:1408–1416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawawa Y, Ishikawa Y, Gomi T et al (2007) Detection of myocardial bridge and evaluation of its anatomical properties by coronary multislice spiral computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 61:130–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeina AR, Odeh M, Blinder J et al (2007) Myocardial bridge: evaluation on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1069–1073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jodocy D, Aglan I, Friedrich G et al (2010) Left anterior descending coronary artery myocardial bridging by multislice computed tomography: correlation with clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 73:89–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM et al (2011) Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1149–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD et al (2013) Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1271–1279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD et al (2014) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of combined assessment using adenosine stress computed tomography perfusion + computed tomography angiography with transluminal attenuation gradient + computed tomography angiography against invasive fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1904–1912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwarz ER, Gupta R, Haager PK et al (2009) Myocardial bridging in absence of coronary artery disease: proposal of a new classification based on clinical-angiographic data and long-term follow-up. Cardiology 112:13–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schwarz ER, Klues HG, vom Dah J et al (1996) Functional, angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1637–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG et al (2010) Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:179–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang J, Li Y, Li M et al (2014) Collateral vessel opacification with CT in patients with coronary total occlusion and its relationship with downstream myocardial infarction. Radiology 271:703–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choi JH, Kim EK, Kim SM et al (2014) Noninvasive evaluation of coronary collateral arterial flow by coronary computed tomographic angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7:482–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zheng M, Wei M, Wen D et al (2015) Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography for determining stenosis severity of calcified coronary artery: a primary study with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 25:1219–1228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bourassa MG, Butnaru A, Lesperance J et al (2003) Symptomatic myocardial bridges: overview of ischemic mechanisms and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:351–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuehua Li
    • 1
  • Mengmeng Yu
    • 1
  • Jiayin Zhang
    • 1
  • Minghua Li
    • 1
  • Zhigang Lu
    • 2
  • Meng Wei
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s HospitalShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of CardiologyShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s HospitalShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations