Gastric cancer: texture analysis from multidetector computed tomography as a potential preoperative prognostic biomarker
- 865 Downloads
To investigate the association between preoperative texture analysis from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.
Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifty-six patients with biopsy-proved gastric cancer were examined by MDCT and treated with surgery. Image features from texture analysis were quantified, with and without filters for fine to coarse textures. The association with survival time was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox analysis.
The following parameters were significantly associated with a negative prognosis, according to different thresholds: energy [no filter] – Logarithm of relative risk (Log RR): 3.25; p = 0.046; entropy [no filter] (Log RR: 5.96; p = 0.002); entropy [filter 1.5] (Log RR: 3.54; p = 0.027); maximum Hounsfield unit value [filter 1.5] (Log RR: 3.44; p = 0.027); skewness [filter 2] (Log RR: 5.83; p = 0.004); root mean square [filter 1] (Log RR: - 2.66; p = 0.024) and mean absolute deviation [filter 2] (Log RR: - 4.22; p = 0.007).
Texture analysis could increase the performance of a multivariate prognostic model for risk stratification in gastric cancer. Further evaluations are warranted to clarify the clinical role of texture analysis from MDCT.
• Textural analysis from computed tomography can be applied in gastric cancer.
• Preoperative non-invasive texture features are related to prognosis in gastric cancer.
• Texture analysis could help to evaluate the aggressiveness of this tumour.
KeywordsGastric cancer Multidetector computed tomography Prognosis Survival Medical oncology
- Log RR
Logarithm of relative risk
Random survival forest
Akaike information criteria
The authors are indebted to all the patients, families, and health care assistants (nurses and radiographers) who greatly contributed to the realisation of this study.
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Francesco De Cobelli. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. The publication did not include animals. Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in Giganti F, Orsenigo E, Esposito A et al. (2015) Prognostic Role of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Resectable Gastric Cancer. 276(2):444–52. Doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141900. Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.
- 7.Giganti F, De Cobelli F, Canevari C et al (2013) Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 40(5):1147–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Tamandl D, Paireder M, Asari R, Baltzer PA, Schoppmann SF, Ba-Ssalamah A (2016) Markers of sarcopenia quantified by computed tomography predict adverse long-term outcome in patients with resected oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Eur Radiol 26(5):1359–1367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Reim D, Loos M, Vogl F et al (2013) Prognostic implications of the seventh edition of the international union against cancer classification for patients with gastric cancer: the Western experience of patients treated in a single-center European institution. J Clin Oncol 31(2):263–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.McAuliffe MJ, McGarry D, Gandler W, et al (2001) 14th IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems. Bethesda, MD: IEEE Computer Society. Medical image processing, analysis and visualization in. Clin Res. 381–386Google Scholar
- 30.Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A et al (2007) The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 245(4):543–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Chapter 2: Information and Likelihood Theory: a basis for model selection and inference. In: Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 49–96Google Scholar
- 37.Van Gómez López O, García Vicente AM, Honguero Martínez AF, et al (2014) Heterogeneity in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of non-small cell lung carcinoma and its relationship to metabolic parameters and pathologic staging. Mol Imaging 13. doi: 10.2310/7290.2014.00032
- 43.Van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Boersma L et al (2007) PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(3):771–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar