Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1789–1799 | Cite as

The benthos as the basis of vendace, Coregonus albula, and perch, Perca fluviatilis, diets in an oligotrophic sub-Arctic lake

  • Nadezhda A. Berezina
  • Alexandra P. Strelnikova
  • Alexey A. Maximov
Original Paper

Abstract

Many small lakes in northern high latitudes are oligotrophic, with very low planktonic primary production, so that benthos may be the important source of carbon for planktonic and benthic fish. To clarify this question, the stomach content analysis in fish and the stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) in pelagic and benthic organisms were conducted in a sub-Arctic lake (Lake Krivoe, White Sea coast, northern Karelia, Russia). We expected to recognize the main food items, their contribution to the diet of dominating adult fish: perch, Perca fluviatilis, and vendace, Coregonus albula, and trophic links between members of lake food webs. Samples were collected in June–October 2009 (ice-free period), from littoral, profundal, and pelagial habitats. Stable isotope analysis allocated four trophic levels (TL) in lake food webs. The large perch (> 180 mm) were found as piscivorous (top) predator (TL > 4), while vendace and smaller perch as omnivorous predators (TL 3.7–3.9). Stable isotope mixing model (IsoSource, δ13C and δ15N) estimated low proportion (1–5%) for crustacean zooplankton in the diet of both fish species that allocated definitively to benthic–littoral food webs. Great part of energy sources for fish derived from benthic/littoral compartments, including 67–75% from benthic amphipods. Our study also provides evidences for size-dependent (ontogenetic) dietary shifts in the foraging strategies for perch and for amphipods. A great importance of omnivory by consumers was revealed for lake food webs.

Keywords

Lake Krivoe White Sea basin Food webs Trophic links Plankton Benthos Fish Stomach content Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted at the White Sea Biostation “Kartesh” (Zoological institute RAS), and we cordially thank the Director of this station, Dr. Alexey A. Sukhotin, for facilities and support. We are grateful to Dr. Vasily Petukhov and Dr. Andrey N. Sharov for help during field works. Also, special cordial thank to Dr. Kestutis Arbaciauskas (The Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania) and Dr. Arturas Razinkovas (Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania) for help with stable isotopes analysis. We highly appreciate the corrections and suggestions given by three anonymous referees, as well as all suggestions given by the editor, Dieter Piepenburg, for improving the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving animal participants

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the practice at which the studies were conducted. This study has been carried out in accordance with the current regulations of the Ministry of Environment of the Russian Federation; all permits for relevant sample collection were obtained during the investigation.

References

  1. Akin Ş, Şahin C, Verep B (2011) Feeding habits of introduced European perch (Perca fluviatilis) in an impounded large river system in Turkey. Afr J Agr Res 6:4293–4307Google Scholar
  2. Berezina NA (2011) Perch-mediated shifts in reproductive variables of Gammarus lacustris (Amphipoda, Gammaridae) in lakes of northern Russia. Crustaceana 84:523–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berezina NA, Strelnikova AP (2010) The role of the introduced amphipod Gmelinoides fasciatus and native amphipods as fish food in two large-scale north-western Russian inland water bodies: Lake Ladoga and Rybinsk reservoir. J Appl Ichthyol 26:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berezina NA, Zhakova LV, Zaporozhets NV, Panov VE (2009) Key role of the amphipod Gmelinoides fasciatus in reed beds of Lake Ladoga. Boreal Env Res 14:404–414Google Scholar
  5. Berezina NA, Maximov AA, Umnova LP, Cao X, Arakelova ES, Zhou Y, Golubkov SM (2017a) Excretion by benthic invertebrates as important source of phosphorus in oligotrophic ecosystem (Lake Krivoe, Northern Russia). J Sib Fed Univ Biol 10:485–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berezina N, Razinkovas-Baziukas A, Tiunov A (2017b) Non-indigenous amphipods and mysids in coastal food webs of eastern Baltic Sea estuaries. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 97:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carabel S, Godínez-Domínguez E, Verísimo P, Fernández L, Freire J (2006) An assessment of sample processing methods for stable isotope analyses of marine food webs Freire. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 336:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czarkowski TK, Martyniak A, Kapusta A, Wójcik A, Bowszys M, Wziatek B, Szamañska U, Kozlowski J (2007) Feeding ecology of vendace, Coregonus albula (L.), in Lake Wigry (northeastern Poland). Arch Pol Fish 15:117–128Google Scholar
  9. Eckmann R, Mörtl M, Baumgärtner D, Berron C, Fischer P, Schleuter D, Weber A (2008) Consumption of amphipods by littoral fish after the replacement of native Gammarus roeseli by invasive Dikerogammarus villosus in Lake constance. Aquat Invasions 3:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eloranta AP, Knudsen R, Amundsen PA (2013) Niche segregation of coexisting Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) constrains food web coupling in subarctic lakes. Freshw Biol 58:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eloranta AP, Kahilainen KK, Admunsen PA, Knudsen R, Harrod C, Jones RI (2015) Lake size and fish diversity determine resource use and trophic position of a top predator in high-latitude lakes. Ecol Evol 5:1664–1675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Fry B, Sherry EB (1984) 13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in manure and freshwater ecosystems. Contrib Mar Sci 27:13–47Google Scholar
  13. Genner MJ, Turner GF, Hawkins SJ (1999) Niche separation among Lake Malawi cichlid fishes? Evidence from stable isotope signatures. Ecol Lett 2:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grey J (2001) Ontogeny and dietary specialization in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) from Loch Ness, Scotland, examined using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Freshw Fish 10:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grey J (2006) The use of stable isotope analyses in freshwater ecology: current awareness. Pol J Ecol 54:563–584Google Scholar
  16. Haakana H, Huuskonen H, Karjalainen J (2007) Predation of perch on vendace larvae: diet composition in an oligotrophic lake and digestion time of the larvae. J Fish Biol 70:1171–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrod C, Grey J (2006) Isotopic variation complicates analysis of trophic relations within the fish community of Plußsee: a small, deep, stratifying lake. Arch Hydrobiol 167:281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hershey AE, Beaty S, Fortino K, Kelly S, Keyse M, Luecke C, O’Brien WJ, Whalen SC (2006) Stable isotope signatures of benthic invertebrates in arctic lakes indicate limited coupling to pelagic production. Limnol Oceanogr 51:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobson KA, Welch HE (1995) Cannibalism and trophic structure in a high arctic lake: insights from stable-isope analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:1195–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyslop EJ (1980) Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17:411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ivanova TS, Berezina NA, Movchan EA, Shatskikh EV (2006) The feeding of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) in the coastal zone of Krivoe Lake (Karelian coast, The White Sea) (in Russian). Vestn S-Peterb Univ Ser 3 Biol 4:79–90Google Scholar
  22. Janjua MY, Gerdeaux D (2011) Evaluation of food web and fish dietary niches in oligotrophic Lake annecy by gut content and stable isotope analysis. Lake Reserv Manag 27:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karlsson J, Byström P (2005) Littoral energy mobilization dominates energy supply for top consumers in subarctic lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 50:538–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khlebovich TV (2010) Structural and trophic characteristics of protozoan plankton in a subarctic Lake (Northern Karelia). Inland Water Biol 3:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kling GW, Fry B, O’Brien WJ (1992) Stable isotopes and planktonic trophic structure in Arctic lakes. Ecology 73:561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kulikova TP (2005) Planktonic fauna of the Zaonezhje Peninsula waters (in Russian). Trans KarRC RAS Ser Biogeogr Karelia 7:142–150Google Scholar
  27. Lappalainen A, Rask M, Koponen H, Vesala S (2001) Relative abundance, diet and growth of perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) at Tvärminne, Northern Baltic Sea, in 1975 and 1997: responses to eutrophication? Boreal Env Res 6:107–118Google Scholar
  28. Lesutiene J, Gorokhova E, Gasiunaite ZR, Razinkovas R (2007) Isotopic evidence for zooplankton as an important food source for the mysid Paramysis lacustris in the Curonian Lagoon, the South-Eastern Baltic Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Logan JM, Jardine TD, Miller TJ, Bunn SE, Cunjak RA, Lutcavage ME (2008) Lipid corrections in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses: comparison of chemical extraction and modelling methods. J Anim Ecol 77:838–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maximov AA, Berezina NA, Petukhov VA (2017) The meio- to macrozoobenthos ratio in a lake benthic community: dynamic aspect. Dokl Biol Sci 473:618–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Northcote TG, Hammar J (2006) Feeding ecology of Coregonus albula and Osmerus eperlanus in the limnetic waters of Lake Malaren, Sweden. Boreal Env Res 11:229–246Google Scholar
  32. Persson L, Eklöv P (1995) Prey refuges affecting interaction between piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) and juvenile perch and roach (Rutilus rutilus). Ecology 76:70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 18:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127:171–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Post DM, Arrington DA, Layman CA, Takimoto G, Quattrochi J, Montaña CG (2007) Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152:179–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rautio M, Vincent WF (2006) Benthic and pelagic food resources for zooplankton in shallow high-latitude lakes and ponds. Freshw Biol 51:1038–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandlund OT, Haugerud E, Rognerud S, Borgstrøm R (2013) Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) squeezed in a complex fish community dominated by perch (Perca fluviatilis). Fauna Norv 33:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD (2002) Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos 98:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sierszen ME, McDonald ME, Jensen DA (2003) Benthos as the basis for arctic lake food webs. Aquat Ecol 37:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stepanova VB (2003) Fauna of relict crustaceous (Malacostraca) from the Gulf of Ob (in Russian). Vestn ekol lesoved landshaftoved 4:97–105Google Scholar
  42. Syväranta J, Jones RI (2008) Changes in feeding niche widths of perch and roach following biomanipulation, revealed by stable isotope analysis. Freshw Biol 53:425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vadeboncoeur Y, McCann K, Zanden M, Rasmussen J (2005) Effects of multi-chain omnivory on the strength of trophic control in lakes. Ecosystems 8:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y (2002) Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83:2152–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yazicioğlu O, Yilmaz S, Yazici R, Erbaşaran M, Polat N (2016) Feeding ecology and prey selection of European perch, Perca fluviatilis, inhabiting a eutrophic lake in northern Turkey. J Freshw Ecol 31:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadezhda A. Berezina
    • 1
  • Alexandra P. Strelnikova
    • 2
  • Alexey A. Maximov
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological InstituteRussian Academy of Science (RAS)St. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute for Biology of Inland WatersRASBorokRussia

Personalised recommendations