Polar Biology

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 753–761 | Cite as

Tundra fire alters vegetation patterns more than the resultant thermokarst

  • Shiro Tsuyuzaki
  • Go Iwahana
  • Kazuyuki Saito
Original Paper


Tundra fires are increasing in their frequencies and intensities due to global warming, which alter revegetation patterns through various pathways. To understand the effects of tundra fire and the resultant thermokarst on revegetation, vegetation and related environmental factors were compared between burned and unburned areas of Seward Peninsula, Alaska, using a total of 140 plots, 50 cm × 50 cm each. The area was burned in 2002 and surveyed in 2013. Seven vegetation types were classified by a cluster analysis and were categorized along a fire-severity gradient from none to severe fire intensity. The species richness and diversity were higher in intermediately disturbed plots. Severe fire allowed the immigration of fire-favored species (e.g., Epilobium angustifolium, Ceratodon purpureus) and decreased or did not change the species diversity, indicating that species replacement occurred within the severely burned site. Although thermokarsts (ground subsidence) broadly occurred on burned sites, due to thawing, the subsidence weakly influenced vegetation patterns. These results suggest that the fire directly altered the species composition at a landscape scale between the burned and unburned sites and it indirectly altered the plant cover and diversity through the differential modification, such as thermokarst, at a small scale within the burned site.


Polygonal ground Landscape patterns Thawing Thermokarst Tundra fire 



The authors thank K. Harada for field assistance. The authors also thank the staff members of IARC (International Arctic Research Center, the University of Alaska at Fairbanks) for various supports, including discussion and language improvement. This work was partly supported by IARC-JAXA and JSPS.


  1. Beringer J, Lynch AH, Chapin FS III, Mack M, Bonan GB (2001) The representation of Arctic soils in the land surface model: the importance of mosses. J Climate 14:3324–3335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bret-Harte MS, Mack MC, Shaver GR, Huebner DC, Johnston M, Mojica CA, Pizano C, Reiskind JA (2013) The response of Arctic vegetation and soils following an unusually severe tundra fire. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120490. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown J, Ferrians OJJ, Heginbottom JA, Melnikov ES (1997) International Permafrost Association Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground. US Geological Survey, RestonGoogle Scholar
  4. Core Team R (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. Cotto O, Wessely J, Georges D, Klonner G, Schmid M, Dullinger S, Thuiller W, Gullaume F (2017) A dynamic eco-evolutionary model predicts slow response of alpine plants to climate warming. Nat Comm 8:15399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gamon JA, Kershaw GP, Williamson S, Hik DA (2012) Microtopographic patterns in an arctic baydjarakh field: do fine-grain patterns enforce landscape stability? Environ Res Lett 7:015502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grosse G, Harden J, Turetsky M, McGuire AD, Camill P, Tarnocai C, Frolking S, Schuur EAG, Jorgenson T, Marchenko S, Romanovsky V, Wickland KP, French N, Waldrop M, Bourgeau-Chavez L, Striegl RG (2011) Vulnerability of high-latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance. J Geophys Res 116: G00K06,
  8. Hinzman LD, Kane DL, Yoshikawa K, Carr A, Bolton WR, Fraver M (2003) Hydrological variations among watersheds with varying degrees of permafrost. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on PermafrostGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu FS, Higuera PE, Duffy P, Chipman ML, Rocha AV, Young AM, Kelly R, Dietze MC (2015) Arctic tundra fires: natural variability and responses to climate change. Front Ecol Environ 13:369–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iwahana G, Harada K, Uchida M, Tsuyuzaki S, Saito K, Narita K, Kushida K, Hinzman L (2016) Geomorphological and geochemistry changes in permafrost after the 2002 wildfire in Kougarok, Seward Peninsula, Alaska. J Geophys Res 121:1697–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jandt R, Joly K, Meyers CR, Racine C (2008) Slow recovery of lichen on burned Caribou Winter Range in Alaska tundra: potential influences of climate warming and other disturbance factors. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones BM, Gusmeroli A, Arp CD, Strozzi T, Grosse G, Gaglioti BV, Whitman MS (2013) Classification of freshwater ice conditions on the Alaskan Arctic Coastal Plain using ground penetrating radar and TerraSAR-X satellite data. Int J Remote Sen 34:8267–8279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones BM, Grosse G, Arp CD, Miller E, Liu L, Jayes DJ, Larsen CF (2015) Recent Arctic tundra fire initiates widespread thermokarst development. Sci Rep 5:15865. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jorgenson MT, Shur YL, Pullman ER (2006) Abrupt increase in permafrost degradation in Arctic Alaska. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kokelj SV, Jorgenson MT (2013) Advances in thermokarst research. Permafrost Periglac Process 24:108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koyama A, Tsuyuzaki S (2013) Facilitation by tussock-forming species on seedling establishment collapses in an extreme drought year in a post-mined Sphagnum peatland. J Veg Sci 24:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lantz TC, Gergel SE, Kokelj SV (2010) Spatial heterogeneity in the shrub tundra ecotone in the Mackenzi Delta Region, Northwest Territories: implications for Arctic environmental change. Ecosystems 13:194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liljedahl A, Hinzman LD, Busey R, Yoshikawa K (2007) Physical short-term changes after a tussock tundra fire, Seward Peninsula, Alaska. J Geophys Res 112: F02S07,
  20. Lloyd AH, Yoshikawa K, Fastie CL, Hinzman L, Fraver M (2003) Effects of permafrost degradation on woody vegetation at arctic treeline on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Permafrost Periglac Process 14:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mack MC, Bret-Harte MS, Hollingsworth TN, Jandt RR, Schuur AG, Shaver GR, Verbyla DL (2011) Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire. Nature 475:489–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  23. Narita K, Harada K, Saito K, Sawada Y, Fukuda M (2015) Vegetation and permafrost thaw depth ten years after a tundra fire, Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Arct Antarct Alp Res 47:547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Panda SK, Prakash A, Solie DN, Romanovsky VE, Jorgenson TM (2010) Remote sensing and field-based mapping of permafrost distribution along the Alaska Highway corridor, interior Alaska. Permafrost Periglac Process 21:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Racine C, Jandt R, Meyers C, Dennis J (2004) Tundra fire and vegetation change along a hillslope on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, USA. Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raynolds MK, Walker DA, Munger CA, Vonlanthen CM, Kade AN (2008) A map analysis of patterned-ground along a North American Arctic Transect. J Geophys Res 113: G03S03,
  27. Rocha AV, Shaver GR (2011) Postfire energy exchange in arctic tundra: the importance and climatic implications of burn severity. Global Change Biol 17:2831–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shuur EAG, Crummer KG, Vogel JG, Mack MC (2007) Plant species composition and productivity following permafrost thaw and thermokarst in Alaskan tundra. Ecosystems 10:280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsuyuzaki S, Ishizaki T, Sato T (1999) Vegetation structure in gullies developed by the melting of ice wedges along Kolyma River, Northeastern Siberia. Ecol Res 14:385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsuyuzaki S, Haraguchi A, Kanda F (2004) Effects of scale-dependent factors on herbaceous vegetation in a wetland, Northern Japan. Ecol Res 19:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsuyuzaki S, Kushida K, Kodama Y (2009) Recovery of surface albedo and plant cover after wildfire in a Picea mariana forest in interior Alaska. Clim Change 93:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsuyuzaki S, Narita K, Sawada Y, Harada K (2013) Recovery of forest-floor vegetation after a wildfire in a Picea mariana forest. Ecol Res 28:1061–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsuyuzaki S, Narita K, Sawada Y, Kushida K (2014) The establishment patterns of tree seedlings are determined immediately after wildfire in a black spruce (Picea mariana) forest. Plant Ecol 215:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2003) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and processes. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. Gen Tech Rep (PNW-GTR-286), PortlandGoogle Scholar
  38. Walker MD, Wahren CH, Hollister RD, Henry GHR, Ahlquist LE, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Cale MP, Callaghan TV, Carroll AB, Epstein HE, Jonsdottir IS, Klein JA, Magnusson B, Molau U, Oberbauer SF, Rewan SP, Robinson CH, Shaver GR, Suding KN, Thompson CC, Tolvanen A, Totland O, Turner PL, Tweedie CE, Webberw PJ, Wookey PA (2006) Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:1342–1346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson SD, Tilman D (2002) Quadratic variation in old-field species richness along gradients of disturbance and nitrogen. Ecology 83:492–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science (GSEES)Hokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.International Arctic Research (IARC)University of AlaskaFairbanksUSA
  3. 3.Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)KanagawaJapan
  4. 4.North-Eastern Federal University in YakutskSakhaRussia

Personalised recommendations