Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 36, Issue 11, pp 1775–1783 | Cite as

Application of droplet digital PCR to determine copy number of endogenous genes and transgenes in sugarcane

Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Droplet digital PCR combined with the low copy ACT allele as endogenous reference gene, makes accurate and rapid estimation of gene copy number in Q208 A and Q240 A attainable.

Abstract

Sugarcane is an important cultivated crop with both high polyploidy and aneuploidy in its 10 Gb genome. Without a known copy number reference gene, it is difficult to accurately estimate the copy number of any gene of interest by PCR-based methods in sugarcane. Recently, a new technology, known as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been developed which can measure the absolute amount of the target DNA in a given sample. In this study, we deduced the true copy number of three endogenous genes, actin depolymerizing factor (ADF), adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) and actin (ACT) in three Australian sugarcane varieties, using ddPCR by comparing the absolute amounts of the above genes with a transgene of known copy number. A single copy of the ACT allele was detected in Q208 A , two copies in Q240 A , but was absent in Q117. Copy number variation was also observed for both APRT and ADF, and ranged from 9 to 11 in the three tested varieties. Using this newly developed ddPCR method, transgene copy number was successfully determined in 19 transgenic Q208 A and Q240 A events using ACT as the reference endogenous gene. Our study demonstrates that ddPCR can be used for high-throughput genetic analysis and is a quick, accurate and reliable alternative method for gene copy number determination in sugarcane. This discovered ACT allele would be a suitable endogenous reference gene for future gene copy number variation and dosage studies of functional genes in Q208 A and Q240 A .

Keywords

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) Sugarcane Copy number Brown rust resistance locus (Bru1) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Bert Collard and Dr Frikkie Botha for providing critical suggestion to improve this paper and Kate Wathen-Dunn for performing the Southern blots. We gratefully acknowledge Sugar Research Australia for funding the research. We also thank DuPont for supplying the gat4621 transgene.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Ghany SE, Golovkin M, Reddy ASN (2015) Engineering of plants for the production of commercially important products: approaches and accomplishments. In: Bahadur B, Venkat Rajam M, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy KV (eds) Plant biology and biotechnology: volume II: plant genomics and biotechnology. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 551–577Google Scholar
  2. Aitken K, Jackson P, McIntyre C (2005) A combination of AFLP and SSR markers provides extensive map coverage and identification of homo(eo)logous linkage groups in a sugarcane cultivar. Theor Appl Gene 110:789–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casu RE, Selivanova A, Perroux JM (2012) High-throughput assessment of transgene copy number in sugarcane using real-time quantitative PCR. Plant Cell Rep 31:167–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chawla R, Ariza-Nieto M, Wilson AJ, Moore SK, Srivastava V (2006) Transgene expression produced by biolistic-mediated, site-specific gene integration is consistently inherited by the subsequent generations. Plant Biotechnol J 4:209–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Damira FU, Melina PU, Jose-Benigno VT, Josefina LF, Raymundo GE, Abraham AS (2016) Development, optimization, and evaluation of a duplex droplet digital PCR assay to quantify the T-nos/hmg copy number ratio in genetically modified maize. Anal Chem 88:812–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Hont A, Ison D, Alix K, Roux C, Glaszmann JC (1998) Determination of basic chromosome numbers in the genus Saccharum by physical mapping of ribosomal RNA genes. Genome 41:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faize M, Faize L, Burgos L (2010) Using quantitative real-time PCR to detect chimeras in transgenic tobacco and apricot and to monitor their dissociation. BMC Biotechnol 10:53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao SW, Yang YY, Wang CF, Guo JL, Zhou DG, Wu QB, Su YC, Xu LP, Que YX (2016) Transgenic sugarcane with a cry1Ac gene exhibited better phenotypic traits and enhanced resistance against sugarcane borer. PLoS One 11(4):e0153929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gentile A, Deng Z, La Malfa S, Distefano G, Domina F, Vitale A, Polizzi G, Lorito M, Tribulato E (2007) Enhanced resistance to Phoma tracheiphila and Botrytis cinerea in transgenic lemon plants expressing a Trichoderma harzianum chitinase gene. Plant Breed 126:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glowacka K, Kromdijk J, Leonelli L, Niyogi KK, Clemente TE, Long SP (2016) An evaluation of new and established methods to determine T-DNA copy number and homozygosity in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ 39:908–917CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, Makarewicz AJ, Bright IJ, Lucero MY, Hiddessen AL, Legler TC, Kitano TK, Hodel MR, Petersen JF, Wyatt PW, Steenblock ER, Shah PH, Bousse LJ, Troup CB, Mellen JC, Wittmann DK, Erndt NG, Cauley TH, Koehler RT, So AP, Dube S, Rose KA, Montesclaros L, Wang SL, Stumbo DP, Hodges SP, Romine S, Milanovich FP, White HE, Regan JF, Karlin-Neumann GA, Hindson CM, Saxonov S, Colston BW (2011) High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem 83:8604–8610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Huggett JF, Foy CA, Benes V, Emslie K, Garson JA, Haynes R, Hellemans J, Kubista M, Nolan R, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT, Bustin SA (2013) The digital MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative digital PCR experiments. Clin Chem 59:892–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson MA, Nutt KA, Hassall R, Rae AL (2010) Comparative efficiency of subcellular targeting signals for expression of a toxic protein in sugarcane. Funct Plant Biol 37:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson MA, Anderson DJ, Birch RG (2013) Comparison of Agrobacterium and particle bombardment using whole plasmid or minimal cassette for production of high-expressing, low-copy transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 22:143–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Joyce P, Kuwahata M, Turner N, Lakshmanan P (2010) Selection system and co-cultivation medium are important determinants of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane. Plant Cell Rep 29:173–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maghuly F, Leopold S, Machado AD, Fernandez EB, Khan MA, Gambino G, Gribaudo I, Schartl A, Laimer M (2006) Molecular characterization of grapevine plants transformed with GFLV resistance genes: II. Plant Cell Rep 25:546–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McCord PH (2016) Using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect copy number variation in sugarcane, a high-level polyploid. Euphytica 209:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meng L, Ziv M, Lemaux PG (2006) Nature of stress and transgene locus influences transgene expression stability in barley. Plant Mol Biol 62:15–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mukaide M, Sugiyama M, Korenaga M, Murata K, Kanto T, Masaki N, Mizokami M (2014) High-throughput and sensitive next-generation droplet digital PCR assay for the quantitation of the hepatitis C virus mutation at core amino acid 70. J Virol Methods 207:169–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park SH, Park J, Smith RH (2001) Herbicide and insect resistant elite transgenic rice. J Plant Physiol 158:1221–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piperidis G, Piperidis N, D’Hont A (2010) Molecular cytogenetic investigation of chromosome composition and transmission in sugarcane. Mol Genet Genom 284:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis Y (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Express, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  25. Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel-electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sreenivasan TV, Ahloowalai BS (1987) Cytogenetics. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 211–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tohidfar M, Khosravi S (2015) Transgenic crops with an improved resistance to biotic stresses. A review. Biotechnol Agron Soc 19:62–70Google Scholar
  28. Uchiyama Y, Nakashima M, Watanabe S, Miyajima M, Taguri M, Miyatake S, Miyake N, Saitsu H, Mishima H, Kinoshita A, Arai H, Yoshiura K, Matsumoto N (2016) Ultra-sensitive droplet digital PCR for detecting a low-prevalence somatic GNAQ mutation in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Sci Rep 6:22985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Vajhala CSK, Sadumpati VK, Nunna HR, Puligundla SK, Vudem DR, Khareedu VR (2013) Development of transgenic cotton lines expressing Allium sativum agglutinin (ASAL) for enhanced resistance against major sap-sucking pests. PLoS One 8(9):e72542CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Whale AS, Huggett JF, Tzonev S (2016) Fundamentals of multiplexing with digital PCR. Biomol Detect Quantif 10:15–23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu H, Awan FS, Vilarinho A, Zeng QC, Kannan B, Phipps T, McCuiston J, Wang WL, Caffall K, Altpeter F (2015) Transgene integration complexity and expression stability following biolistic or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 51:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xue BT, Guo JL, Que YX, Fu ZW, Wu LG, Xu LP (2014) Selection of suitable endogenous reference genes for relative copy number detection in sugarcane. Int J Mol Sci 15:8846–8862CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang LT, Ding JY, Zhang CM, Jia JW, Weng HB, Liu WX, Zhang DB (2005) Estimating the copy number of transgenes in transformed rice by real-time quantitative PCR. Plant Cell Rep 23:759–763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yao Q, Cong L, Chang JL, Li KX, Yang GX, He GY (2006) Low copy number gene transfer and stable expression in a commercial wheat cultivar via particle bombardment. J Exp Bot 57:3737–3746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yi CX, Zhang J, Chan KM, Liu XK, Hong Y (2008) Quantitative real-time PCR assay to detect transgene copy number in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Anal Biochem 375:150–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sugar Research AustraliaIndooroopillyAustralia

Personalised recommendations