Skip to main content
Log in

Überraschung in der Abradatdiagnostik

Surprise in abrasion diagnostics

  • Pitfalls
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Plattenepithelkarzinome im Bereich der Gynäkologie kommen häufig im Bereich der Zervix, Vulva und Vagina vor und werden daher nicht selten in Abradaten diagnostiziert. Bei oberflächlichen Probeentnahmen verruköser, hochdifferenzierter Plattenepithelkarzinome ist die Abgrenzung gegenüber reaktiv-hyperplastischen Veränderungen und einer möglichen Invasivität häufig schwierig. Der nachstehende Pitfall beschreibt einen derartigen Tumor mit entsprechenden diagnostischen Schwierigkeiten.

Abstract

Typical localizations of gynecological squamous cell carcinomas are the cervix, vulva and vagina and are therefore not uncommonly diagnosed in curettages. A differentiation from reactive hyperplastic alterations with a possible invasiveness in samples taken from the surface of the special type of well-differentiated verrucous squamous cell carcinoma can be difficult. This pitfall of such a tumor is presented in the case described here with corresponding diagnostic difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Ackerman LV (1948) Verrucous carcinoma of oral cavity. Surgery 23:670–678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. del Carmen MG, McIntyre JF, Fuller AF, Nikrui N, Goodman A (2000) Intraoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of pelvic gynecologic malignancies: a review of fifteen cases. Gynecol Oncol 79(3):457–462 (PMID: 11104619)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stockinger R, Sterlacci W, Neunteufel W, Boesl A, Spreitzer S, Offner F (2014) Verrucous carcinoma of the endometrium: a rare and challenging diagnosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 33(3):298–301. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182936503 (PMID: 24681742)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH (Hrsg) (2014) WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs, 4. Aufl. IARC Press, Lyon

  5. Bogani G, Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Donadello N, Ghezzi F (2014) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium in elderly women: a report of four cases. Aging Clin Exp Res 26:543–545

  6. Bures N, Nelson G, Duan Q, Magliocco A, Demetrick D, Duggan MA (2013) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium: clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics. Int J Gynecol Pathol 32(6):566–575 (PMID: 24071873)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano G, Pizzi S, Azzoni C, Bottarelli L, D’Adda T (2013) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium unrelated to human papilloma virus: a molecular study. Pathol Oncol Res 19(3):495–499 (PMID: 23430758)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bifulco G, Giampaolino P, Mandato VD, Morra I, Nappi C, Insabato L (2011) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium: a case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 32(3):350–352 (PubMed PMID: 21797134)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SJ, Choi HJ (2012) Primary endometrial squamous cell carcinoma: a case report and review of relevant literature on Korean women. Korean J Pathol 46(4):395–398. doi:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2012.46.4.395. Epub 2012 Aug 23. PMC3479822

  10. Horn LC, Richter CE, Einenkel J, Tannapfel A, Liebert UG, Leo C (2006) p16, p14, p53, cyclin D1, and steroid hormone receptor expression and human papillomaviruses analysis in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Ann Diagn Pathol 10(4):193–196 (PubMed PMID: 16844559)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo SH, Son EM, Sung CO, Kim KR (2013) Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the upper genital tract: utility of p16(INK4a) expression and HPV DNA status in its differential diagnosis from extended cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Korean J Pathol 47(6):549–556. doi:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.549. Epub 2013 Dec 24. PubMed PMID: 24421848; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3887157

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Kellner.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

U. Kellner, A. Kellner und U. Cirkel geben an, das kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

C. Kuhnen, Münster

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kellner, U., Kellner, A. & Cirkel, U. Überraschung in der Abradatdiagnostik. Pathologe 36, 317–320 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-015-0021-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-015-0021-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation