Sorbent system based on organosilane-coated polyurethane foam for oil spill clean up

Abstract

In this study, flexible and open cell polyurethane foams were formulated and chemically modified with organosilane to be used as a sorbent system for oil spill cleanup. Six polyurethane foams with different densities and three oil types with different viscosities were investigated. Moreover, sorbents were characterized based on their surface modification and sorption capacities. The main results indicated that the surface treatment on the solid fraction of the foam was effective, observing by the contact angle, thereby increasing the hydrophobicity of the samples. Cell morphology and foam density directly affect the sorption capacity of foams. Foams with high densities are indicated for oils with low viscosity, and foams with low densities are indicated for viscous oils. The oil sorption capacity also depends on oil viscosity (and temperature).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

(adapted from Lu 2013) [31]

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    Wu D, Fang L, Qin Y, Wu W, Mao C, Zhu H (2014) Oil sorbents with high sorption capacity, oil/water selectivity and reusability for oil spill cleanup. Mar Pollut Bull 84(1–2):263–267

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aljaroudi A, Khan F, Akinturk A, Haddara M, Thodi P (2015) Risk assessment of offshore crude oil pipeline failure. J Loss Prev Process Ind 37:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Keshawy M, Farag RK, Gaffer A (2019) Egyptian crude oil sorbent based on coated polyurethane foam waste. Egypt J Petroleum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2019.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ge J, Zhao HY, Zhu HW, Huang J, Shi LA, Yu SH (2016) Advanced sorbents for oil-spill cleanup: recent advances and future perspectives. Adv Mater 28(47):10459–10490

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lim TT, Hunag X (2007) Evaluation of kapok (Ceibapentandra (L.) Gaertn.) as a natural hollow hydrophobic–oleophilic fibrous sorbent for oil spill cleanup. Chemosphere 66:955–963

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shenkmann L, Stokstad E (2010) Gulf oil disaster. AAAS 328:1214–1225

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bai Y, Bai Q (2014) Subsea pipeline integrity and risk management. In: Oil spill response plan. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 377–390. ISBN: 9780123946485. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394432-0.00018-4

  8. 8.

    Nordvik AB, Simmons JL, Bitting KR, Lewis A, Kristiansen TS (1996) Oil and water separation in marine oil spill clean-up operations. Spill Sci Technol Bull 3(3):107–122

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wei Q, Oribayo O, Feng X, Rempel GL, Pan Q (2018) Synthesis of polyurethane foams loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles and their modification for enhanced performance in oil spill cleanup. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:8918–8926

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bayat A, Aghamiri SF, Moheb A, Vakili-Nezhadd GR (2005) Oil spill cleanup from sea water by sorbent materials. Chem Eng Technol 28(2):1525–1528

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tanobe VOA (2007) Desenvolvimento de sorventes à base de espumas de poliuretanos flexíveis para o setor do petróleo. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia e Ciência dos materiais) – Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba

  12. 12.

    Li H, Liu L, Yang F (2013) Oleophilic polyurethane foams for oil spill cleanup. Procedia Environ Sci 18:528–533

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Adebajo MO, Frost RL, Kloprogge JT, Carmody O, Kokot S (2003) Porous materials for oil spill cleanup: a review of synthesis and absorbing properties. J Porous Mater 10:159–170

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Payne KC, Jackson CD, Aizupurua CE, Rojas OJ, Hubbe MA (2012) Oil spills abatement: factors affecting oil uptake by cellulosic fibers. Environ Sci Technol 46(14):7725–7730

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Duong HTT, Burford RP (2006) Effect of foam density, oil viscosity, and temperature on oil sorption behavior of polyurethane. J Appl Polym Sci 99:360–367

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liu Y, Ma J, Wu T, Wang X, Huang G, Liu Y, Qiu H, Li Y, Wang W, Gao J (2013) Cost-effective reduced graphene oxide-coated polyurethane sponge as a highly efficient and reusable oil-absorbent. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:10018–10026

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Reynolds JG, Coronado PR, Hrubesh LW (2001) Hydrophobic aerogels for oil-spill clean up—synthesis and characterization. J Non-Cryst Solids 293(1–3):127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chung S, Suidan MT, Venosa AD (2011) Partially acetylated sugarcane bagasse for wicking oil from contaminated wetlands sugarcane. Chem Eng Technol 34(12):1989–1996

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li H, Liu L, Yang F (2012) Hydrophobic modification of polyurethane foam for oil spill cleanup. Mar Pollut Bull 64:1648–1653

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Armenta JLR, Heinze T, Martínez AMM (2004) New polyurethane foams modified with cellulose derivatives. Eur Polymer J 40(12):2803–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Atta AM, Brostow W, Datashvili T, El-Ghazwy RA, Lobland HEH, Hasana AM, Perez JM (2013) Porous polyurethane foams based on recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) for oil sorption. Polym Int 62(1):116–126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhu Q, Pan Q, Liu F (2011) Facile removal and collection of oils from water surfaces through superhydrophobic and superoleophilic sponges. J Phys Chem 115:17464–17470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Santos OSH, da Silva MC, Yoshida MI (2017) Synthesis and performance of different polyurethane foams as oil sorbents. J Appl Polym Sci 134(41):45409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Król P, Król B (2012) Surface free energy of polyurethane coatings with improved hydrophobicity. Colloid Polym Sci 290:879–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li B, Liu X, Zhang X, Chai W, Ma Y, Tao J (2015) Facile preparation of graphene-coated polyurethane sponge with superhydrophobic/superoleophilic properties. J Polym Res 22:190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xie X, Ye M, Hu L, Liu N, McDonough JR, Chen W, Alshareef HN, Criddle CS, Cui Y (2012) Carbon nanotube-coated macroporous sponge for microbial fuel cell electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 5:5265

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Keshavarz A, Zilouei H, Abdolmaleki A, Asadinezhad A (2015) Enhancing oil removal from water by immobilizing multi-wall carbon nanotubes on the surface of polyurethane foam. J Environ Manage 157:279–286

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nikkhah AA, Zilouei H, Asadinezhad A, Keshavarz A (2015) Removal of oil from water using polyurethane foam modified with nanoclay. Chem Eng J 262:278–285

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Peng L, Yuan S, Yan G, Yu P, Luo Y (2014) Hydrophobic sponge for spilled oil absorption. J Appl Polym Sci 131(20):40886

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Abdelmouleh M, Boufi S, Ben Salah A, Belgacem MN, Gandini A (2002) Interaction of silane coupling agents with cellulose. Langmuir 18:3203–3208

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lu N, Oza S (2013) Thermal stability and thermo-mechanical properties of hemp-high density polyethylene composites: effect of two different chemical modifications. Compos B 44:484–490

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gwon JG, Lee SY, Doh GH, Kim JH (2010) Characterization of chemically modified wood fibers using FTIR spectroscopy for biocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 116:3212–3219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gu R, Sain MM (2013) Effects of wood fiber and microclay on the performance of soy based polyurethane foams. J Polym Environ 21:30–38

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wu Z, Li C, Liang H, Chen J, Yu S (2013) Ultralight, flexible, and fire-resistant carbon nanofiber aerogels from bacterial cellulose. Angewandte 52(10):2997–3001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cunha AG, Freire C, Silvestre A, Neto CP, Gandini A, Belgacem MN, Chaussy D, Beneventi D (2010) Preparation of highly hydrophobic and lipophobic cellulose fibers by a straightforward gas–solid reaction. J Colloid Interface Sci 344:588–595

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fenner BR, Zimmermann MVG, da Silva MP, Zattera AJ (2018) Comparative analysis among coating methods offlexible polyurethanefoams with graphene oxide. J Mol Liq 271:74–79

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The experiment was assisted by Polymers Laboratory (LAPOL), Central Laboratory of Microscopy and Laboratory of Materials Chemical Reasearch at the University of Caxias do Sul.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matheus Vinícius Gregory Zimmermann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zimmermann, M.V.G., Zattera, A.J., Fenner, B.R. et al. Sorbent system based on organosilane-coated polyurethane foam for oil spill clean up. Polym. Bull. 78, 1423–1440 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03169-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • PU foams
  • Sorbents
  • Organosilane
  • Oil spill