Permeation characterization and modelling of polyethylene/clay nanocomposites for packaging

Abstract

The approach of upgrading barrier properties of polymer with nanofillers is effectual and well established now-a-days to manufacture films and quality packaging. This research deals with enhancement of barrier attributes of clay-based high density polyethylene nanocomposites against oxygen and water permeability. Na-Montmorillonite and two grades of kaolin clays were used for HDPE/clay nanocomposites preparation in twin-screw extruder with temperature profile of 160, 170, 180, 190 and 200 °C along the extruder at 110 rpm with clay loading up to 10 wt%. The extent of maximum reduction in water and oxygen vapors permeation was more prominent at 5 wt% sample of each clay. XRD analysis revealed no exfoliation in kaolin clay samples but indicated presence of exfoliation in Na-MMT samples. SEM and TEM micrographs revealed nano-level dispersion for both kaolin clays and Na-MMT and agglomerate formation at high wt% of clays. Experimental data for oxygen and water vapors permeation through nanocomposites were fitted on Nielsen, Cussler and Gusev–Lutsi models. Modelling of barrier performance was utilized for acquiring aspect ratio of filler for nanocomposites. Maximum and average aspect ratio of fillers and third-degree polynomial equation for nanocomposite, through curve fitting, were determined to predict improved barrier properties of nanocomposites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Kotsilkova R (2007) Thermoset nanocomposites for engineering applications. Smithers Rapra Tecchnology, Shawbury

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thomas S, Stephen R (2010) Rubber Nanocomposites: preparation, properties, and applications. Wiley, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S (2011) Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 36:1766–1782

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Suprakas SR, Masami O (2003) Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci 28:1539–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kiliaris P, Papaspyrides CD (2010) Polymer/layered silicate (clay) nanocomposites: an overview of flame retardancy. Prog Polym Sci 35(7):902–958

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zheng QH, Yu AB, Lu GQ, Paul DR (2005) Clay-based polymer nanocomposites: research and commercial development. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 5:1574–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pinnavaia TJ, Beall GW (2000) Polymer clay nano-composites. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gómez M, Palza H, Quijada R (2016) Influence of organically-modified montmorillonite and synthesized layered silica nanoparticles on the properties of polypropylene and polyamide-6 nanocomposites. Polymers 386(8):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Romanzini D, Piroli V, Frache A, Zattera AJ, Amico SC (2015) Sodium montmorillonite modified with methacryloxy and vinylsilanes: influence of silylation on the morphology of clay/unsaturated polyester nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 114:550–557

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Araujo EM, Barbosa R, Rodrigues AWB, Melo TJA, Ito EN (2007) Processing and characterization of polyethylene/Brazilian clay nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng, A 445–446:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mallakpour S, Barati A (2012) Application of modified cloisite Na + with LPhenylalanine for the preparation of new poly(vinyl alcohol)/organoclay bionanocomposite films. Polym-Plast Technol 51:321–327

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Möller MW, Kunz DA, Lunkenbein T, Sommer S (2012) UV-cured, flexible, and transparent nanocomposite-coating with remarkable oxygen barrier. Adv Mater 24:2142–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Koo J (2006) Polymer nanocomposites: processing, characterization, and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dazhu C, Haiyang Y, Pingsheng H, Weian Z (2005) Rheologicaland extrusion behavior of intercalated high-impact/organomontmorillonite nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 65:1593–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Reddy CS, Ratna D, Das CK (2008) Polyethylene nanocomposites by gas-phase polymerization of ethylene in the presence of a nanosilica-supported zirconocene catalyst system. Polym Int 57(2):282–291

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gill YQ, Jin J, Song M (2015) Melt flow behavior of high density polyethylene nanocomposites with 1D, 2D and 3D nanofillers. Nanocomposites 1(3):160–169

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Villanueva MP, Cabedo L, Giménez E, Lagarón JM, Coates PD, Kelly AL (2009) Study of dispersion of nanoclays in a LDPE matrix using microscopy and in-process ultrasonic monitoring. Polym Test 28:277–287

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Villanueva MP, Cabedo L, Lagaron JM, Gimenez E (2010) Comparative study of nanocomposites of polyolefin compatibilizers containing kaolinite and montmorillonite organoclays. J Appl Polym Sci 115:1325–1335

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mittal V (2010) Barrier properties of polymer clay nanocomposites. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mittal V (2007) Mechanical and gas permeation properties of compatibilized polypropylene–layered silicate nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 107(2):1350–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bhattacharya M, Biswas S, Bhowmick AK (2011) Permeation characteristics and modeling of barrier properties of multifunctional rubber nanocomposites. Polymer 52:1562–1576

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Alexandre B, Colasse L, Langevin D, Médéric P, Aubry T, Chappey C, Marais S (2010) Transport mechanisms of small molecules through polyamide 12/montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B 114(27):8827–8837

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mittal V (2013) Modelling and prediction of barrier properties of polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Polym Polym Compos 21(8):509–518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sun L, Boo WJ, Clearfield A, Sue H-J, Pham HQ (2008) Barrier properties of model epoxy nanocomposites. J Membr Sci 318(1–2):129–136

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Meneghetti P, Shaikh S, Qutubuddin S, Nazarenko S (2008) Synthesis and characterization of styrene-butadiene rubber-clay nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and gas barrier properties. Rubb Chem Technol 81(5):821–841

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mastromatteo M, Conte A, Previtali MA, Nobile MAD (2016) Simplified approach based on polynomial equations to predict the permeability of micro-perforated polymeric films. Packag Technol Sci 29:549–558

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasir Qayyum Gill.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer: The following paper contains sections taken from corresponding authors PhD thesis titled: Preparation and characterization of polyethylene based nanocomposites for potential applications in packaging. The thesis is available online at https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/18052/2/Thesis-2015-Gill.pdf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gill, Y.Q., Song, M. & Abid, U. Permeation characterization and modelling of polyethylene/clay nanocomposites for packaging. Polym. Bull. 77, 3749–3765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02930-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Modelling
  • Kaolin
  • Packaging
  • HDPE
  • Nanocomposites
  • Barrier