Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 5, pp 2311–2319 | Cite as

Polymeric molecular coating for oxidation resistance property of copper surface

  • Hai Thanh Nguyen
  • Jaeyoung Jeon
  • Takuya Ikeda
  • Kaoru AdachiEmail author
  • Yasuhisa Tsukahara
Original Paper


Copper is known to easily react with oxygen in air to form oxide layer on the surface. In order to address the issue, we examined polymeric molecular coatings of copper surfaces by using thiol-terminated polystyrenes with various molecular weights. The polymeric molecular coatings were simply deposited by immersion of the copper specimens in the corresponding polymer solutions. The obtained specimens showed low surface electrical resistance despite the presence of the coatings. These high surface conductivities were retained even after heat treatment at 150 °C in air for several hours, which indicates high thermal stability of the coatings. It was observed that the higher thermal stability was supplied by longer chain of the polymeric coating. The results of quantitative analyses by electrochemical approach indicate that the higher air oxidation resistance property was provided by longer polymer chain of the coating, whereas shorter chain gave higher electrochemical oxidation resistance properties on the surface.


  1. 1.
    Cruzan CG, Miley HA (1940) Cuprous-cupric oxide films on copper. J Appl Phys 11:631–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen K, Song S, Xue D (2013) Vapor-phase crystallization route to oxidized Cu foils in air as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Cryst Eng Commun 15:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tamai T, Kawano T (1994) Significant decrease in thickness of contaminant films and contact resistance by humidification. IEICE Trans Electron 10:1614–1620Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yokoyama S, Takahashi H, Itoh T, Motomiya K, Tohji K (2014) Surface modification of Cu metal particles by the chemical reaction between the surface oxide layer and a halogen surfactant. J Phys Chem Solids 75:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magdassi S, Grouchko M, Kamyshny A (2010) Copper nanoparticles for printed electronics: routes towards achieving oxidation stability. Materials 3:4626–4638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maho A, Denayer J, Delhalle J, Mekhalif Z (2011) Electro-assisted assembly of aliphatic thiol, dithiol and dithiocarboxylic acid monolayers on copper. Electorochim Acta 56:3954–3962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laibinis PE, Whitesides GM (1990) Self-assembled monolayers of n-alkanethiolates on copper are barrier films that protect the metal against oxidation by air. J Am Chem Soc 114:9022–9028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Love JC, Estroff LA, Kriebel JK, Nuzzo RG, Whitesides GM (2005) Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem Rev 105:1103–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caprioli F, Decker F, Marriani AG, Beccari M, Castro VD (2010) Copper protection by self-assembled monolayers of aromatic thiols in alkaline solutions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:9230–9238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caprioli F, Martinelli A, Gazzoli D, Castro VD, Decker F (2012) Enhanced protective properties and structural order of self-assembled monolayers of aromatic thiols on copper in contact with acidic aqueous solution. J Phys Chem C 116:4628–4636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bourg MC, Badia A, Lennox RB (2000) Gold–sulfur bonding in 2D and 3D self-assembled monolayers: XPS characterization. J Phys Chem B 104:6562–6567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mu X, Gao A, Wang D, Yang P (2015) Self-assembled monolayer-assisted negative lithography. Langmuir 31:2922–2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tatay S, Barraud C, Galbiati M, Seneor P, Mattana R, Bouzehouane K, Deranlot C, Jacquet E, Aliaga AF, Jegou P, Fert A, Petroff F (2012) Self-assembled monolayer-functionalized half-metallic manganite for molecular spintronics. ACS Nano 6:8753–8757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin Y, Ourdjini O, Giovanelli L, Clair S, Faury T, Ksari Y, Themlin JM, Porte L, Abel M (2013) Self-assembled melamine monolayer on Cu(111). J Phys Chem Solids 117:9895–9902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yokoyama S, Takahashi H, Itoh T, Motomiya K, Tohji K (2013) Elucidation of the reaction mechanism during the removal of copper oxide by halogen surfactant at the surface of copper plate. Appl Surf Sci 264:664–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Worley BC, Ricks WA, Prendergast MP, Gregory BW, Collins R, Cassimus JJ Jr, Thompson RG (2013) Anodic passivation of tin by alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers examined by cyclic voltammetry and coulometry. Langmuir 29:12969–12981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morf P, Raimondi F, Nothofer HG, Schnyder B, Yasuda A, Wessels JM, Jung TA (2006) Dithiocarbamates: functional and versatile linkers for the formation of self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 22:658–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikeda T, Adachi K, Tsukahara Y (2016) Enhancement of oxidation resistance and its influence on contact electric resistance of copper by bromination. J MMIJ 132:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikeda T, Takata T, Adachi K, Tsukahara Y (2016) Enhancement of oxidation resistance of copper by an organic thin layer and its influence on electrical conductivity. Kobunshi Ronbunshu 73:198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takagi J, Ikeda T, Adachi K, Tsukahara Y (2016) Study on oxidation resistance of copper plate with organic thin layer by cyclic voltammetry. Kobunshi Ronbunshu 73:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yamakawa K, Takagi J, Nguyen TH, Adachi K, Tsukahara Y (2018) Oxidation resistance of nickel surface by molecular coating of thiol-terminated polymers. Chem Lett 47:119–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang H, Penn LS (2005) Dense tethered layers by the “grafting-to” approach. Macromolecules 38:4837–4843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang S, Vi T, Luo K, Koberstein JT (2016) Kinetics of polymer interfacial reactions: polymer brush formation by click reactions of alkyne end-functional polymers with azide-functional substrates. Macromolecules 49:5461–5474CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Molecular Chemistry and EngineeringKyoto Institute of TechnologyKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations