Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 5, pp 2197–2213 | Cite as

Biodegradation of copolymer obtained by grafting reaction between methacrylic acid and starch

  • Vladimir NikolicEmail author
  • Branka Loncarevic
  • Aleksandar Popovic
Original Paper


Biodegradation of methacrylic acid and starch graft copolymers was investigated for the first time in this manuscript. Synthesized copolymer was characterized by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and elemental analysis. Copolymers with different percentage of grafting, G (%), were buried in three different types of soil. Biodegradation was monitored by measuring mass loss of the samples and using FTIR and SEM. The highest weight loss was in soil for the orchid growth (all samples had biodegradation higher than 89%), followed by soil for the cactus growth (mass loss higher than 70%) and soil rich in humus where some of the samples had biodegradation rate near or less than 50%. The correlation between G (%) and percent of weight loss after biodegradation was not significant in any types of soil. FTIR and SEM showed that after biodegradation, samples still contained both building components. Respiration test showed higher O2 consumption and CO2 production comparing to polystyrene which confirmed biodegradability of the accessible starch in copolymer. Based on the obtained results, degradation mechanism is proposed. First step is biodegradation of easily accessible starch followed by dissolution of the poly(methacrylic acid). This mechanism confirmed that biodegradation depends not only on the percentage of grafting, but also on molecular packaging, chains arrangement and the number and types of microorganisms present in the specific types of soils.


Starch Methacrylic acid Graft copolymers Biodegradation Soil 



This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia through funding for Projects OI 172001 and III 43004.

Supplementary material

289_2018_2484_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)


  1. 1.
    Babu R, O’Connor K, Seeram R (2013) Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Prog Biomater 2(8):1–16Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lewandowich G, Leja K (2010) Polymer biodegradation and biodegradable polymers—a review. Pol J Environ Stud 19(2):255–266Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho SH, Moon MM, Kim M, Nam K, Kim YJ (2011) Biodegradability and biodegradation rate of poly(caprolactone)-starch blend and poly(butylene succinate) biodegradable polymer under aerobic and anaerobic environment. Waste Manag 31:475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bootklad M, Kaewtatip K (2013) Biodegradation of thermoplastic starch/eggshell powder composites. Carbohyd Polym 97:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pushpadass AH, Weber AR, Dumais JJ, Hanna AM (2010) Biodegradation characteristics of starch–polystyrene loose-fill foams in a composting medium. Bioresour Technol 101:7258–7264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meshram WM, Patil VV, Mhaske TS, Thorat NB (2009) Graft copolymers of starch and its application in textiles. Carbohyd Polym 75:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mou J, Li X, Wang H, Fei G, Liu Q (2012) Preparation, characterization, and water resistance of cationic acetylated starch-g-poly(styrene-butyl acrylate) surfactant-free emulsion. Starch 64:826–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canché-Escamilla G, Canché-Canché M, Duarte-Aranda S, Cácres-Farfán M, Borges-Argáes R (2011) Mechanical properties and biodegradation of thermoplastic starches obtained from grafted starches with acrylics. Carbohyd Polym 86:1501–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li M-C, Lee KJ, Cho RU (2012) Synthesis, characterization, and enzymatic degradation of starch-grafted poly(methyl methacrylate) copolymer films. J Appl Polym Sci 125:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luckachan EG, Pillai SKC (2011) Biodegradable polymers—a review on recent trends and emerging perspectives. J Polym Environ 19:637–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sivan A (2011) New perspectives in plastic biodegradation. Curr Opin Biotech 22:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prakash Maran P, Sivakumar V, Thirugnanasambandham K, Sridhar R (2014) Degradation behavior of biocomposites based on cassava starch buried under indoor soil conditions. Carbohyd Polym 101:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanrattanakul V, Chumeka W (2010) Effect of potassium persulfate on graft copolymerization and mechanical properties of cassava starch/natural rubber foams. J Appl Polym Sci 116:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nikolic V, Velickovic S, Popovic A (2014) Biodegradation of polystyrene-graft-starch copolymers in three different types of soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:9877–9886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nikolic V, Velickovic S, Popovic A (2012) Amine activators influence on grafting reaction between methacrylic acid and starch. Carbohyd Polym 88:1407–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greenberg EA, Trussell RR, Clesceri SL, Franson AA (1985) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Punlic Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shaikh MM, Lonikar SV (2009) Starch-acrylics graft copolymers and blends: synthesis, characterization, and applications as matrix for drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci 114(5):2893–2900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nikolić V, Veličković S, Antonović D, Popović A (2013) Biodegradation of starch–graft–polystyrene and starch–graft–poly(methacrylic acid) copolymers in model river water. J Ser Chem Soc 78(9):1425–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowler P, Williams MR, Angold RE (1980) A hypothesis for the morphological changes which occur on heating lenticular wheat starch in water. Starch 32(6):186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tizzotti JM, Sweedman CM, Tang D, Schaefer C, Gilbert GG (2011) New 1H NMR procedure for the characterization of native and modified food-grade starches. J Agric Food Chem 59:6913–6919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shi Z, Reddy N, Shen L, Hou X, Yang Y (2014) Effects of monomers and homopolymer contents on the dry and wet tensile properties of starch films grafted with various methacrylates. J Agric Food Chem 62:4668–4676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alariya SS, Sethi S, Gupta S, Gupta BL (2003) Amylase activity of a starch degrading bacteria isolated from soil. Arch Appl Sci Res 5(1):15–24Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sigh B, Sharma N (2007) Optimized synthesis and characterization of polystyrene graft copolymers and preliminary assessment of their biodegradability and application in water pollution alleviation technologies. Polym Degrad Stab 92:876–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation Center, Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Institute of Chemistry, Technology and MetallurgyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations