Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 813–824 | Cite as

Controlled drug release behavior of 5-aminosalicylic acid using polyacrylamide grafted oatmeal (OAT-g-PAM): a pH-sensitive drug carrier

  • Srijita BhartiEmail author
  • Sumit Mishra
Original Paper


In the present investigation, we have evaluated the in vitro drug release of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) using polyacrylamide grafted oatmeal (OAT-g-PAM). The graft co-polymer was synthesized by following free radical co-polymerization pathway using acrylamide as a monomer and ceric ammonium nitrate as a free radical initiator in the presence of microwave. The matrix tablet was prepared using the different grades of developed graft co-polymers following standard protocol. In vitro release phenomena of 5-ASA from the prepared matrix tablet up to 12 h in different buffer solution, i.e., pH 2.0, 7.0 and 7.4, an ideal condition for colon specific drug delivery was studied. The release rate of 5-ASA can be controlled efficiently by tuning the pH value. The drug release kinetic of 5-ASA from different matrix tablet was evaluated on the basis of in vitro controlled drug release results. The result indicates that the novel pH-sensitive matrices under study showing Fickian diffusion mechanism and potentially constructive for colonic drug delivery system.


Oatmeal Graft co-polymers Biopolymeric matrices Controlled and targeted drug release 5-ASA Drug release kinetics Fickian release behavior 



Authors deeply acknowledge the financial support received from Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India, in form of research grant (Letter No.: SR/FT/CS-113/2011 dated 29/06/2012).


  1. 1.
    Rosler A, Vandermeulen GWM, Klok HA (2001) Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sinha VR, Kumria R (2003) Microbially triggered drug delivery to the colon. Eur J Pharm Sci 18:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Florence AT, Jani PU (1993) Particulate delivery: the challenge of the oral route. In: Rolland A (ed) Pharmaceutical particulate carriers: therapeutic applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 65–107Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen H, Langer R (1998) Oral particulate delivery: status and future trends. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 34:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newsletter (2002) Oral drug delivery. Drug, Oct 2002Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinha VR, Kumria R (2001) Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm 224:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vandamme TF, Lenourry A, Charrueau C, Chaumeil JC (2001) The use of polysaccharides to target drugs to the colon. Carbohydr Polym 48:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fix JA (1996) Oral controlled release technology for peptides: status and future prospects. Pharm Res 13:1760–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu LS, Fishman ML, Kost J, Hicks KB (2003) Pectin-based systems for colon-specific drug delivery via oral route. Biomaterials 24:3333–3343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sen G, Mishra S, Jha U, Pal S (2010) Microwave initiated synthesis of polyacrylamide grafted guar gum (GG-g-PAM) Characterizations and application as matrix for controlled release of 5-amino salicylic acid. Int J Biol Macromol 47:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pal S, Sen G, Mishra S, Dey RK, Jha U (2008) Carboxymethyl tamarind: synthesis, characterization and its application as novel drug-delivery agent. J App Polym Sci 110:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sen G, Pal S (2009) Microwave initiated synthesis of polyacrylamide grafted carboxymethyl starch (CMS-g-PAM): application as a novel matrix for sustained drug release. Int J Biol Macromol 45:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rani GU, Konreddy AK, Mishra S, Sen G (2014) Synthesis and applications of polyacrylamide grafted agar as a matrix for controlled drug release of 5-ASA. Int J of Biol Macromol 65:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bharti S, Mishra S, Dey KP (2015) Synthesis and characterization of novel OAT-g PMMA matrices: its application in controlled and colonic drug delivery. Adv Polym Technol 36:466–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhardwaj TR, Kanwar M, Lal R, Gupta A (2000) Natural gums and modified natural gums as sustained-release carriers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 26:1025–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Billa N, Yuen KH (2000) Formulation variables affecting drug release from xanthan gum matrices at laboratory scale and pilot scale. AAPS Pharm Sci Technol 1:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Munday DL, Cox PJ (2000) Compressed xanthan and karaya gum matrices: hydration, erosion and drug release mechanisms. Int J Pharm 203:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Talukdar MM, Vanden MG, Augustijns P, Tjandra MT, Verbeke N, Kinget R (1998) In vitro evaluation of xanthan gum as a potential excipient for oral controlled-release matrix tablet formulation. Int J Pharm 169:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colombo P, Bettini R, Santi P, Peppas NA (2000) Swellable matrices for controlled drug delivery: gel-layer behaviour, mechanisms and optimal performance. Pharm Sci Technol Today 3:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siepmann J, Peppas NA (2000) Hydrophilic matrices for controlled drug delivery: an improved mathematical model to predict the resulting drug release kinetics (the “sequential layer” model). Pharm Res 17:1290–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mundargi RC, Patil SA, Aminabhavi TM (2007) Evaluation of acrylamide-grafted-xanthan gum copolymer matrix tablets for oral controlled delivery of antihypertensive drugs. Carbohydr Polym 69:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yin HQ, Lee ES, Kim D, Lee KH, Oh KT, Bae Y (2008) Physicochemical characteristics of pHsensitivepoly(l-Histidine)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(l -Lactide)-b-poly(ethylene glycol) mixed micelles. J Control Release 126:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prokop A, Kozlov E, Carlesso G, Davidson JM (2002) Hydrogel-based colloidal polymeric system for protein and drug delivery: physical and chemical characterization, permeability control and applications. Adv Polym Sci 160:119–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang LB (2008) Biorelevant dissolution testing of colon-specific delivery systems activated by colonic microflora. J Control Release 125:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dhareshwar SS, Stella VJ (2008) Your prodrug releases formaldehyde: should you be concerned? No! J Pharm Sci 97:4184–4193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dong-Ying Xu, Li G-J, Liao Z-F, He X-H (2009) Preparation and in vitro controlled release behavior of a novel pH-sensitive drug carrier for colon delivery. Polym Bull 62:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thakur S, Govender PP, Mamo MA, Tamulevicius S, Mishra YK, Thakur VK (2017) Progress in lignin hydrogels and nanocomposites for water purification: future perspectives. Vacuum 146:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thakur S, Govender PP, Mamo MA, Tamulevicius S, Thakur VK (2017) Recent progress in gelatin hydrogel nanocomposites for water purification and beyond. Vacuum 146:396–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miculescu F, Maidaniuc A, Voicu SI, Thakur VK, Stan GE, Ciocan LT (2017) Progress in hydroxyapatite-starch based sustainable biomaterials for biomedical bone substitution applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(10):8491–8512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bharti S, Mishra S, Narendra LV (2015) Comparative studies on the high performance flocculating agent of novel polyacrylamide grafted oatmeal. Adv Polym Technol 35:162–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bharti S, Mishra S, Sen G (2013) Ceric ion initiated synthesis of polyacrylamide grafted oatmeal: its application as flocculant for wastewater treatment. Carbohydr Polym 93:528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh B, Chauhan GS, Bhatt SS, Kumar K (2006) Metal ion sorption and swelling studies of psyllium and acrylic acid based hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 64:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peppas NA, Franson NM (1983) The swelling interface number as a criterion for prediction of diffusional solute release mechanisms in swellable polymers. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 21:983–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987) A simple equation for description of solute release. II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J Control Release 5:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Geresh S, Gdalevsky GY, Gilboa I, Voorspoels J, Remon JP, Kost J (2004) Bioadhesive grafted starch copolymers as platforms for peroral drug delivery: a study of theophylline release. J Control Release 94:391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peppas NA (1985) Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv 60:110–111Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Song CX, Labhasetwar L, Levy RJ (1997) Controlled release of U-86983 from double-layer biodegradable matrices: effect of additives on release mechanism and kinetics. J. Control Release 45:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryBirla Institute of TechnologyRanchiIndia

Personalised recommendations