Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 1185–1195 | Cite as

Synergistic effects of fillers on recycled polystyrene composites

Original Paper
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we have explored the use of recycled materials such as recycled polystyrene (rPS), wood flour (WF), and short carbon fibers (SCF) to manufacture structural composite materials. Green composites were compounded from rPS (matrix), WF (fillers), and SCF (reinforcements) with varying composition in terms of their weight fractions. The main objective of this study was to gain useful insights into synergistic effects between WF and SCF in the rPS matrix. The dynamic mechanical properties of WF and SCF-reinforced rPS composites were investigated as a function of the filler content. The incorporation of WF into rPS was found to increase the storage modulus and glass transition temperature, and glass transition temperature (T g) compared to neat rPS. The use of SCF improved the storage modulus as well as T g of the composites because of the synergistic effect between WF and SCF in matrix interfacial adhesion. FTIR spectroscopy revealed the functional groups present in these green composites. Structure–property correlations of the green composites were deduced from thermal, mechanical, and morphological studies.

Keywords

Wood Green composites Recycled polymer Short carbon fibers DMA Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) and Institution of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE).

Supplementary material

289_2017_2085_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (618 kb)
Support Figure 1: DSC thermogram for neat rPS and its nanocomposites. Support Figure 2: FTIR spectra for neat rPS along with rPS–SCF–wood composite (PPTX 618 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    La Mantia FP, Morreale M (2011) Green composites: a brief review. Compos A 42:579–588Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Najafi SK (2013) Use of recycled plastics in wood plastic composites: a review. Waste Manage 33:1898–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pickering SJ (2006) Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials—current status. Composites A 37:1206–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bravo JM, Baldwin LJ. Wood-polymer composites and additive systems therefor. US Patent: 20060091578 A1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sobczak L, Lang RW, Haider A (2012) Polypropylene composites with natural fibers and wood: general mechanical property profiles. Compos Sci Technol 72:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hristov VN, Lach R, Grellmann W (2004) Impact fracture behavior of modified polypropylene/wood fiber composites. Polym Test 23:581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agoua E, Elisabeth A-H, Adjovi E, Togbedji B (2013) Thermal conductivity of composites made of wastes of wood and expanded polystyrene. Constr Build Mater 41:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coutinho FMB, Costa THS, Suarez JCM, Melo DP (2000) Sawdust reinforced polypropylene composites: a study of fracture behavior. Polym Test 19:625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bengtsson M, Gatenholm P, Oksman K (2005) The effect of crosslinking on the properties of polyethylene/wood flour composites. Compos Sci Technol 65:1468–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borsoi C, Scienza LC, Zattera AJ (2013) Characterization of composites based on recycled expanded polystyrene reinforced with curaua fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 128:653–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bismarck A, BaltazarY-J A, Sarlkakis K (2006) Green composites as panacea? Socio-economic aspects of green materials. Environ Dev Sustain 8:445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ashori A (2008) Wood–plastic composites as promising green-composites for automotive industries! Biores Technol 99:4661–4667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adhikary KB, Pang S, Staiger MP (2008) Dimensional stability and mechanical behaviour of wood–plastic composites based on recycled and virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Compos B 39:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manikandan Nair KC, Sabu T, Groeninckx G (2001) Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of polystyrene composites reinforced with short sisal fibres. Compos Sci Technol 61:2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joseph PV, Mathew G, Joseph K, Groeninckx G, Sabu T (2003) Dynamic mechanical properties of short sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos A 34:275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fu SY, Lauke B, Mader E, Yue CY, Hu X (2000) Tensile properties of short-glass-fiber and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 31:1117–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sandeep Kumar BK, Satapathy AP (2011) Thermo-mechanical correlations to erosion performance of short carbon fibre reinforced vinyl ester resin composites. Mater Design 32:2260–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lisperguer J (2011) Thermal and mechanical properties of wood flour-polystyrene blends from postconsumer plastic waste. J Appl Polym Sci 119:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 264Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Idicula M, Malhotra SK, Joseph K, Sabu T (2005) Dynamic mechanical analysis of randomly oriented intimately mixed short banana/sisal hybrid fibre reinforced polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 65:1077–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gregorova A. Wimmer R (2012) Filler-matrix compatibility of PLA based composites. In: Piemonte V (ed) Polylactic acid: synthesis, properties and applications. Chapter 5, Nova Science, New York, NY, USA, pp 97–119Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE)Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations