Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Comparison of Different Methods to Identify tdh-Positive Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates

  • Hongzhi Zhang
  • Min Chen
Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

We evaluated the accuracy and ease of operation of three methods to identify tdh-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates, including the Kanagawa phenomenon test (KP test), a tdh gene PCR test, and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (CGIA). A total of 221 V. parahaemolyticus isolates were collected from patients, freshly harvested seafood, and fresh seawater. Using the KP test, 92% of V. parahaemolyticus isolates from patients were identified tdh-positive, including four weak KP-positive isolates. The PCR test and CGIA also identified 92% of the isolates as tdh-positive. However, PCR and CGIA only confirmed one of the four weak KP-positive isolates. Similar results were obtained using the three methods to identify V. parahaemolyticus isolates from the other sources. Among the three methods, the KP test was the simplest to perform because it lacked any requirement for sample pretreatment, and was low cost, with no equipment requirements. Therefore, the KP test has been applied widely in many first-line quarantine laboratories. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of KP test were lower than those of the other two methods. PCR can identify the tdh rapidly, specifically, and sensitively. However, PCR requires equipment and facilities that are unavailable in first-line quarantine laboratories. The CGIA can compensate for the disadvantages of the other two methods by its higher sensitivity, accuracy, and ease of operation. Therefore, the CGIA has the highest potential to be used to identify tdh-positive V. parahaemolyticus isolates to guarantee food safety.

Keywords

Vibrio parahaemolyticus tdh gene Kanagawa phenomenon test PCR assay Colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (CGIA) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Changyi Chen for kindly providing Wagatsuma blood agar plates. We also thank Xuebin Xu for kindly providing TDH detection kit. This work was supported by a Grant from the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 15ZR1435000 to Hongzhi Zhang, 2015) and the 4th Three-year Action Plan for Public Health of Shanghai (The Project No. GWTD2015S01).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  1. 1.
    Suzuki N, Ueda Y, Furukawa T, Takegaki Y, Miyagi K, Noda K, Hirose H, Hashimoto S, Yano S, Ishibashi M, Honda T (1997) Incidence of Kanagawa phenomenon-positive and –negative Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from traveller’s diarrhea and their relation to tdh and trh genes. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 71(5):417–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hondo S, Goto I, Minematsu I, Ikeda N, Asano N, Ishibashi M (1987) Gastroenteritis due to Kanagawa negative Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Lancet 1:331–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Su YC, Liu CC (2007) Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a concern of seafood safety. Food Microbiol 24:549–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chartrand C, Leeflang MMG, Minion J, Brewer T, Pai M (2012) Accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 156:500–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nishibuchi M, Kumagai K, Kaper JB (1991) Contribution of the tdh 1 gene of Kanagawa phenomenon-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus to production of extracellular thermostable direct hemolysin. Microb Pathog 11:453–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishibuchi M, Kaper JB (1990) Duplication and variation of the thermostable direct haemolysin (tdh) gene in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol Microbiol 4:87–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taniguchi H, Ohta H, Ogawa M, Mizaguchi Y (1985) Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of Vibrio parahaemolyticus thermostable direct hemolysin and thermolabile hemolysin genes. J Bacteriol 162:510–515PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang HP, Zhang JL, Jiang T, Bao YX, Zhou XM (2011) Insufficiency of the Kanagawa hemolysin test for detecting pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Shanghai, China. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 69:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang HZ, Sun SF, Shi WM, Cui L, Gu QF (2013) Serotype, virulence, and genetic traits of foodborne and clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates in Shanghai, China. Foodborne pathog Dis 10:796–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hara-Kudo Y, Sugiyama K, Nishibuchi M, Chowdhury A, Yatsuyanagi J, Ohtomo Y, Saito A, Nagano H, Nishina T, Nakagawa H, Konuma H, Miyahara M, Kumagai S (2003) Prevalence of pandemic thermostable direct hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in seafood and the coastal environment in Japan. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(7):3883–3891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakazaki R, Tamura K, Kato T, Obara Y, Yamai S, Hobo K (1968) Studies of the enteropathogenic, facultatively halophilic bacteria, Vibrio parahaemolyticus III. Enteropathogenicity. Jpn J Med Sci Biol 21:325–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satio S, Iwade Y, Tokuoka E, Nishio T, Otomo Y, Araki E, Konuma H, Nakagawa H, Tanaka H, Suguyama K, Hasegawa A, Sugita-Konishi Y, Hara-Kudo Y (2015) Epidemiological evidence of lesser role of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH)-related hemolysin (TRH) on Vibrio parahaemolyticus pathogenicity. Foodborne Pathog Dis 12(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haley BJ, Kokashvii T, Tskshvediani A, Janelidze N, Mitaishvili N, Grim J, de Constantin MG, Chen AJ, Taviani E, Eliashvili T, Tediashvili M, Whitehouse CA, Colwell RR, Huq A (2014) Molecular diversity and predictability of Vibrio parahaemolyticus along the Georgian coastal zone of the Black sea. Front Microbiol 5:45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okuda J, Nishibuchi M (1998) Manifestation of the Kanagawa phenomenon, the virulence-associated phenotype, of Vibrio parahaemolyticus depends on a particular single base change in the promoter of the thermostable direct haemolysin gene. Mol Microbiol 3:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oliver JD, Kaper JB (2007) Vibrio species. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ (eds) Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. ASM press, Washington, DC, pp 343–379Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Letchumanan V, Yin WF, Lee LH, Chan KG (2015) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio paahaemolyticus isolated from retail shrimps in Malaysia. Front Microbiol 6:33PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dileep V, Kumar HS, Kumer Y, Nishibuchi M, Karunasagar I (2003) Application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with tropical seafoods and coastal environment. Lett Appl Microbiol 36:423–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chowdhury A, Ishibashi M, Thiem V, Tuyet D, Tung T, Chien B (2004) Emergency and serovar transition of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strains during a diarrhea outbreak in Vietnam between 1997 and 1999. Micriobiol Immunol 48:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shalu OA, Pisanov RV, Monakhova EV (2012) Effective of expression of tdh gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus depends on two point mutations in promoter region. Genetika 48:1463–1471Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yeung PS, Boor KJ (2004) Epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention of foodborne Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections. Foodborne Pathog Dis 1:74–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fujino T, Yeung Okuno Y, Nakada D, Aoyama A, Fukai K, Mukai T, Ueho T (1953) On the bacteriological examination of shirasu-food poisoning. Med J Osaka Univ 4:299–304Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaufman GE, Myers ML, Pass CL, Bej AK, Kaysner CA (2001) Molecular analysis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from human patients and shellfish during US Pacific north-west outbreaks. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miyamoto Y, Kato T, Obara S, Akiyama S, Takizawa K, Yamai S (1969) In vitro characteristic of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: its close correlation with human pathogenicity. J Bacteriol 100:1147–1149PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baba K, Shirai H, Terai A (1991) Analysis of the tdh geen cloned from a tdh gene and trh-positive strain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiol Immunol 35:253–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shirai Nishibuchi H, Ito H, Hirayama T, Nakabayashi Y, Kumagai K, Takeda Y, Nishibuchi M (1990) Molecular epidemiologic evidence for association of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin of Vibrio parahaemolytics with gastroenteritis. Infect Immun 58:3568–3573PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and PreventionShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations