Impact of formulation on the iontophoretic delivery of the FOLFIRINOX regimen for the treatment of pancreatic cancer
- 42 Downloads
Effective treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer is a significant unmet clinical need. One major hurdle that exists is inadequate drug delivery due to the desmoplastic stroma and poor vascularization that is characteristic of pancreatic cancer. The local iontophoretic delivery of chemotherapies provides a novel way of improving treatment. With the growing practice of highly toxic combination therapies in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, the use of iontophoresis for local delivery can potentiate the anti-cancer effects of these therapies while sparing unwanted toxicity. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of formulation on the electro-transport of the FOLFIRINOX regimen for the development of a new treatment for pancreatic cancer.
Three formulations of the FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) were generated at a fixed pH of 6.0 and were referred to as formulation A (single drug solution with all four drugs combined), formulation B (two drug solutions with two drugs per solution), and formulation C (four individual drug solutions). Anodic iontophoresis of the three different formulations was evaluated in orthotopic patient-derived xenografts of pancreatic cancer.
Iontophoretic transport of the FOLFIRINOX drugs was characterized according to organ exposure after a single device treatment in vivo. We report that the co-iontophoresis of two drug solutions, leucovorin + oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil + irinotecan, resulted in the highest levels of cytotoxic drugs in the tumor compared to drugs delivered individually or combined into one solution. There was no significant difference in plasma, pancreas, kidney, and liver exposure to the cytotoxic drugs delivered by the three different formulations. In addition, we found that reducing the duration of iontophoretic treatment from 10 to 5 min per solution resulted in a significant decrease in drug concentrations.
Underlying the difference in drug transport of the formulations was electrolyte concentrations, which includes both active and inactive components. Electrolyte concentrations can hinder or improve drug electro-transport. Overall, balancing electrolyte concentration is needed for optimal electro-transport.
KeywordsIontophoresis FOLFIRINOX Pancreatic cancer Device delivery Chemotherapy
Folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin
University of North Carolina
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectroscopy
We would like to thank X. Wang, C. Santos, S. Herrera-Loeza, UNC Animal Studies Core, PDX Program, and the Tissue Procurement Facility for their contributions to this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
J. D. B., J. M. D., and J. J. Y. hold equity in the start-up company, Advanced Chemotherapy Technologies L.L.C.
- 3.Olive KP, Jacobetz MA, Davidson CJ, Gopinathan A, McIntyre D, Honess D, Madhu B, Goldgraben MA, Caldwell ME, Allard D, Frese KK, Denicola G, Feig C, Combs C, Winter SP, Ireland-Zecchini H, Reichelt S, Howat WJ, Chang A, Dhara M, Wang L, Rückert F, Grützmann R, Pilarsky C, Izeradjene K, Hingorani SR, Huang P, Davies SE, Plunkett W, Egorin M, Hruban RH, Whitebread N, McGovern K, Adams J, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Griffiths J, Tuveson DA (2009) Inhibition of hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324:1457–1461CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Byrne JD, Jajja MR, O’Neill AT, Bickford LR, Keeler AW, Hyder N, Wagner K, Deal A, Little RE, Moffitt RA, Stack C, Nelson M, Brooks CR, Lee W, Luft JC, Napier ME, Darr D, Anders CK, Stack R, Tepper JE, Wang AZ, Zamboni WC, Yeh JJ, DeSimone JM (2015) Local iontophoretic administration of cytotoxic therapies to solid tumors. Sci Transl Med 7:273ra14CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardière C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Péré-Vergé D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M, Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer, PRODIGE Intergroup (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Moffitt RA, Marayati R, Flate EL, Volmar KE, Loeza SG, Hoadley KA, Rashid NU, Williams LA, Eaton SC, Chung AH, Smyla JK, Anderson JM, Kim HJ, Bentrem DJ, Talamonti MS, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Hollingsworth MA, Yeh JJ (2015) Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Genet 47:1168–1178CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Louvet C, Coudray AM, Tournigand C, Prévost S, Raymond E, de Gramont A, Chazard M, Gespach C (2000) Synergistic antitumoral activity of combined UFT, folinic acid and oxaliplatin against human colorectal HT29 cell xenografts in athymic nude mice. Anticancer Drugs 11:579–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wallace BD, Roberts AB, Pollet RM, Ingle JD, Biernat KA, Pellock SJ, Venkatesh MK, Guthrie L, O’Neal SK, Robinson SJ, Dollinger M, Figueroa E, McShane SR, Cohen RD, Jin J, Frye SV, Zamboni WC, Pepe-Ranney C, Mani S, Kelly L, Redinbo MR (2015) Structure and inhibition of microbiome β-glucuronidases essential to the alleviation of cancer drug toxicity. Chem Biol 22:1238–1249CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Büchel B, Rhyn P, Schürch S, Bühr C, Amstutz U, Largiadèr CR (2013) LC–MS/MS method for simultaneous analysis of uracil, 5,6-dihydrouracil, 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil in human plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicity prediction in cancer patients. Biomed Chromatogr 27:7–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL, Goldstein D, Glimelius B, Artru P, Borbath I, Bouché O, Shannon J, André T, Mineur L, Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Louvet C, LAP07 Trial Group (2016) Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:1844–1853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Indolfi L, Ligorio M, Ting DT, Xega K, Tzafriri AR, Bersani F, Aceto N, Thapar V, Fuchs BC, Deshpande V, Baker AB, Ferrone CR, Haber DA, Langer R, Clark JW, Edelman ER (2016) A tunable delivery platform to provide local chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Biomaterials 93:71–82CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Wu H, Infante JR, Keedy VL, Jones SF, Chan E, Bendell JC, Lee W, Kirschbrown WP, Zamboni BA, Ikeda S, Kodaira H, Rothenberg ML, Burris HA, Zamboni WC (2015) Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PEGylated liposomal irinotecan (IHL-305) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Int J Nanomed 10:1201–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Leucovorin [package insert] (2012) Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Schaumburg, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
- 24.5-Fluorouracil [package insert] (2000) APP Pharmaceuticals, Schaumburg, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
- 25.Irinotecan [package insert] (2008) Sun Pharmaceuticals, Gujarat, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Oxaliplatin [package insert] (2009) Hospira, Gujarat, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kurata N, Fujita H, Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Mahawithitwong P, Sakai H, Onimaru M, Manabe T, Ohtsuka T, Tanaka M (2011) Predicting the chemosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells by quantifying the expression levels of genes associated with the metabolism of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil. Int J Oncol 39:473–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Cui Y, Brosnan JA, Blackford A, Sur S, Hruban RH, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Maitra A, Diaz LA, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Eshleman JR (2012) Genetically defined subsets of human pancreatic cancer demonstrate unique in vitro chemosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res 18:6519–6530CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar