Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized phase II trial of erlotinib vs. S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (HOT1002)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A high proportion of patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive third-line therapy and beyond, with no prospective randomized trials addressing the issue. This study aimed to select the most suitable regimen as a third- or fourth-line therapy for wild-type EGFR NSCLC.

Methods

This multicenter, randomized phase II study in Japan included patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR, who progressed after two or three previous chemotherapies. The patients were randomly assigned to erlotinib (150 mg/day, days 1–21) or S-1 (80–120 mg/day, days 1–14) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

Results

From 2011 to 2016, 37 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib (E arm, n = 19) and S-1 (S arm, n = 18). This study was terminated prematurely because of poor patient accrual. DCR/ORR were 42.1%/15.8% in the E arm and 66.7%/16.7% in the S arm. Median PFS/OS were 1.6 months/8.0 months in the E arm and 3.3 months/12.2 months in the S arm. In both groups, the most commonly reported grade 3–4 toxicities were fatigue, anorexia, and nausea. One grade 5 pneumonitis occurred in the S arm. No significant difference was seen in QOL.

Conclusions

S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for wild-type EGFR NSCLC showed numerically better clinical outcomes than erlotinib.

Clinical trial registration no.

UMIN000005308.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

DCR:

Disease control rate

OS:

Overall survival

PFS:

Progression-free survival

ORR:

Objective response rate

QOL:

Quality of life

HOT:

Hokkaido oncology trial

ECOG PS:

Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status

Gr:

Grade

BSA:

Body surface area

FACT-L:

Functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

CI:

Confidence interval

HR:

Hazard ratio

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohe Y, Ohashi Y, Kubota K, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Negoro S, Nishiwaki Y, Saijo N, Ariyoshi Y, Fukuoka M (2007) Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: four-arm cooperative study in Japan. Ann Oncol 18:317–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paz-Ares LG, de Marinis F, Dediu M, Thomas M, Pujol JL, Bidoli P, Molinier O, Sahoo TP, Laack E, Reck M, Corral J, Melemed S, John W, Chouaki N, Zimmermann AH, Visseren-Grul C, Gridelli C (2013) PARAMOUNT: final overall survival results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:2895–2902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, Mattson K, Gralla R, O’Rourke M, Levitan N, Gressot L, Vincent M, Burkes R, Coughlin S, Kim Y, Berille J (2000) Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18:2095–2103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, De Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TC, Pless M, Muller T, Lim HL, Desch C, Szondy K, Gervais R, Shaharyar, Manegold C, Paul S, Paoletti P, Einhorn L, Bunn PA Jr (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:1589–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, Crawford J, Natale RR, Dunphy F, Kalman L, Miller V, Lee JS, Moore M, Gandara D, Karp D, Vokes E, Kris M, Kim Y, Gamza F, Hammershaimb L (2000) Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2354–2362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Waterhouse D, Ready N, Gainor J, Arén Frontera O, Havel L, Steins M, Garassino MC, Aerts JG, Domine M, Paz-Ares L, Reck M, Baudelet C, Harbison CT, Lestini B, Spigel DR (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:123–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhäufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crinò L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:1627–1639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, O’Brien M, Rao S, Hotta K, Leiby MA, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Rangwala R, Brahmer JR, KEYNOTE-024 Investigators (2016) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1823–1833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, De Marinis F, Turna H, Lee JS, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR; OAK Study Group (2017) Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389:255–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T, Socinski MA, Gervais R, Wu YL, Li LY, Watkins CL, Sellers MV, Lowe ES, Sun Y, Liao ML, Osterlind K, Reck M, Armour AA, Shepherd FA, Lippman SM, Douillard JY (2008) Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial. Lancet 372:1809–1818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Asahina H, Sekine I, Horinouchi H, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kubota K, Tamura T (2012) Retrospective analysis of third-line and fourth-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 13:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabárbara P, Seymour L, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (2005) Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azzoli CG, Baker S Jr, Temin S, Pao W, Aliff T, Brahmer J, Johnson DH, Laskin JL, Masters G, Milton D, Nordquist L, Pfister DG, Piantadosi S, Schiller JH, Smith R, Smith TJ, Strawn JR, Trent D, Giaccone G, American Society of Clinical Oncology (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:6251–6266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Okamoto I, Yoshioka H, Morita S, Ando M, Takeda K, Seto T, Yamamoto N, Saka H, Asami K, Hirashima T, Kudoh S, Satouchi M, Ikeda N, Iwamoto Y, Sawa T, Miyazaki M, Tamura K, Kurata T, Fukuoka M, Nakagawa K (2010) Phase III trial comparing oral S-1 plus carboplatin with paclitaxel plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a west Japan oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 28:5240–5246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Totani Y, Saito Y, Hayashi M, Tada T, Kohashi Y, Mieno Y, Kato A, Imizu H, Yoneda Y, Hoshino T, Uchiyama Y, Takeuchi Y, Okazawa M, Sakakibara H (2009) A phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:1181–1185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nokihara H, Nagai S, Kato T, Koizumi F, Nishio K, Yamamoto N, Sekine I, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Tamura T (2007) Phase II study of S-1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. J Thorac Oncol 2:S687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ono A, Naito T, Murakami H, Takahashi T, Nakamura Y, Tsuya A, Kaira K, Igawa S, Shukuya T, Tamiya A, Kaira R, Endo M, Yamamoto N (2010) Evaluation of S-1 as third- or further-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 15:161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langer CJ, Mok T, Postmus PE (2013) Targeted agents in the third-/fourth-line treatment of patients with advanced (stage III/IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer Treat Rev 39:252–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harada T, Oizumi S, Ito K, Takamura K, Kikuchi E, Kuda T, Sugawara S, Suzuki A, Maemondo M, Fujita Y, Kinoshita I, Inoue A, Hommura F, Katsuura Y, Dosaka-Akita H, Isobe H, Nishimura M, Hokkaido Lung Cancer Clinical Study Group (2013) A phase II study of amrubicin as a third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Hokkaido Lung Cancer Clinical Study Group Trial (HOT) 0901. Oncologist 18:439–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsubara N, Maemondo M, Inoue A, Ishimoto O, Watanabe K, Sakakibara T, Fukuhara T, Morikawa N, Tanaka M, Sugawara S, Nukiwa T (2013) Phase II study of irinotecan as a third- or fourth-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NJLCG0703. Respir Investig 51:28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cella D, Eton DT, Fairclough DL, Bonomi P, Heyes AE, Silberman C, Wolf MK, Johnson DH (2002) What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. J Clin Epidemiol 55:285–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, Farina G, Veronese S, Rulli E, Bianchi F, Bettini A, Longo F, Moscetti L, Tomirotti M, Marabese M, Ganzinelli M, Lauricella C, Labianca R, Floriani I, Giaccone G, Torri V, Scanni A, Marsoni S, TAILOR trialists (2013) Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14:981–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawaguchi T, Ando M, Asami K, Okano Y, Fukuda M, Nakagawa H, Ibata H, Kozuki T, Endo T, Tamura A, Kamimura M, Sakamoto K, Yoshimi M, Soejima Y, Tomizawa Y, Isa S, Takada M, Saka H, Kubo A (2014) Randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second- or third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial (DELTA). J Clin Oncol 32:1902–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishio M, Mok TSK, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto N, Shi Y, Zhang L, Lu S, Soo R, Yang J, Morita S, Sugawara S, Nokihara H, Takahashi T, Goto K, Chang J, Maemondo M, Ichinose Y, Cheng Y, Lim WT, Tamura T (2016) EAST-LC: randomized controlled phase III trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had received a platinum-based treatment. Ann Oncol 27:1218PD

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miyoshi S, Ito R, Katayama H, Kadowaki T, Yano S, Watanabe A, Abe M, Hamada H, Okura T, Higaki J (2014) Phase II trial of S-1 as third-line or further chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 19:1005–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wada M, Yamamoto M, Ryuge S, Nagashima Y, Hayashi N, Maki S, Otani S, Katono K, Takakura A, Yanaihara T, Igawa S, Yokoba M, Mitsufuji H, Kubota M, Katagiri M, Masuda N (2012) Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69:1005–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shao YY, Shau WY, Lin ZZ, Chen HM, Kuo R, Yang JC, Lai MS (2013) Comparison of gefitinib and erlotinib efficacies as third-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 49:106–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshioka H, Hotta K, Kiura K, Takigawa N, Hayashi H, Harita S, Kuyama S, Segawa Y, Kamei H, Umemura S, Bessho A, Tabata M, Tanimoto M, Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group (2010) A phase II trial of erlotinib monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who do not possess active EGFR mutations: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group trial 0705. J Thorac Oncol 5:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Minemura H, Yokouchi H, Azuma K, Hirai K, Sekine S, Oshima K, Kanazawa K, Tanino Y, Inokoshi Y, Ishii T, Katsuura Y, Oishi A, Ishida T, Munakata M (2015) A phase II trial of erlotinib monotherapy for pretreated elderly patients with advanced EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Res Notes 8:220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gallant JN, Sheehan JH, Shaver TM, Bailey M, Lipson D, Chandramohan R, Red Brewer M, York SJ, Kris MG, Pietenpol JA, Ladanyi M, Miller VA, Ali SM, Meiler J, Lovly CM (2015) EGFR kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is a novel oncogenic driver in lung cancer that is clinically responsive to afatinib. Cancer Discov 5:1155–1163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ho C, Ramsden K, Zhai Y, Murray N, Sun S, Melosky B, Laskin J (2014) Less toxic chemotherapy improves uptake of all lines of chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a 10-year retrospective population-based review. J Thorac Oncol 9:1180–1186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen YM, Perng RP, Shih JF, Tsai CM, Whang-Peng J (2006) Salvage therapy for Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 1:545–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Popat S, Barbachano Y, Ashley S, Norton A, O’Brien M (2008) Erlotinib, docetaxel, and gefitinib in sequential cohorts with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 59:227–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their families as well as all of the investigators.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajime Asahina.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The all authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of all participating institutions (clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005308).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Hokkaido Lung Cancer Clinical Study Group: Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005308.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikezawa, Y., Asahina, H., Oizumi, S. et al. A randomized phase II trial of erlotinib vs. S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (HOT1002). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80, 955–963 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3432-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3432-4

Keywords

Navigation