Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Α multicenter phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with irinotecan as second-line treatment of patients with refractory small-cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and irinotecan in patients with refractory small-cell lung cancer.

Patients and methods

Thirty-one patients with early relapse after first-line therapy with cisplatin/etoposide were treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 15 mg/m2 and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. Treatment was repeated every 28 days.

Results

A total of 144 chemotherapy courses were administered. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and twenty-six (84%) for response. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in two (6.5%) patients and grade 1 thrombocytopenia in one (3.2%). Fatigue was the most frequent grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity and was observed in seven patients (23%). Four (12.9; 95% CI: 1.1–24.7%) patients achieved a partial response, and disease stabilization was observed in additional two (6.5%) patients (Tumor Growth Control: 19.4; 95% CI: 5.5–33.3%). The median TTP was 2.03 months, and the median survival time was 3.16 months.

Conclusions

The combination of pegylated doxorubicin and irinotecan is very well tolerated but with modest activity in patients with refractory SCLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fried DB, Morris DE, Poole C, Rosenman JG, Halle JS, Detterbeck FC, Hensing TA, Socinski MA (2004) Systematic review evaluating the timing of thoracic radiation therapy in combined modality therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4837–4845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brahmer JR, Ettinger DS (1998) Carboplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 3:143–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pujol JL, Carestia L, Daures JP (2000) Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent. Br J Cancer 83:8–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackman DM, Johnson BE (2005) Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 366:1385–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huisman C, Postmus PE, Giaccone G, Smit EF (1999) Second-line chemotherapy and its evaluation in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 25:199–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Postmus PE, Berendsen HH, van Zandwijk N, Splinter TA, Burghouts JT, Bakker W (1987) Retreatment with the induction regimen in small cell lung cancer relapsing after an initial response to short term chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:1409–1411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hurwitz JL, McCoy F, Scullin P, Fennell DA (2009) New advances in the second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 14:986–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong RL, Huang CJ, Tseng YL, Pang VF, Chen ST, Liu JJ, Chang FH (1999) Direct comparison of liposomal doxorubicin with or without polyethylene glycol coating in C-26 tumor-bearing mice: is surface coating with polyethylene glycol beneficial? Clin Cancer Res 5:3645–3652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leighl NB, Goss GD, Lopez PG, Burkes RL, Dancey JE, Rahim YH, Rudinskas LC, Pouliot JF, Rodgers A, Pond GR, Shepherd FA (2006) Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 52:327–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carboni MC, Coderoni S (1994) Effect of CPT on the DNA cleavage/religation reaction mediated by calf thymus Topoisomerase I: evidence of an inhibition of DNA religation. Inhibition of Topoisomerase I-mediated DNA religation by CPT. Mol Biol Rep 20:129–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Natale R, Lara P, Chansky K (2008) S0124: a randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin (IP) with etoposide/cisplatin (EP) in patients (pts) with previously untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer (E-SCLC). J Clin Oncol 26(20 suppl) (Ref Type: Abstract)

  12. Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y, Matsui K, Takifuji N, Kudoh S, Negoro S, Nishioka M, Nakagawa K, Takada M (1992) CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:1225–1229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandler A (2002) Irinotecan plus cisplatin in small-cell lung cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 16:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masuda N, Matsui K, Negoro S, Takifuji N, Takeda K, Yana T, Kobayashi M, Hirashima T, Kusunoki Y, Ushijima S, Kawase I, Tada T, Sawaguchi H, Fukuoka M (1998) Combination of irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:3329–3334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rocha-Lima CM, Herndon JE, Lee ME, Atkins JN, Mauer A, Vokes E, Green MR (2007) Phase II trial of irinotecan/gemcitabine as second-line therapy for relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 39902. Ann Oncol 18:331–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cortes F, Pinero J (1994) Synergistic effect of inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II on chromosome damage and cell killing in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 34:411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eder JP, Chan V, Wong J, Wong YW, Ara G, Northey D, Rizvi N, Teicher BA (1998) Sequence effect of irinotecan (CPT-11) and topoisomerase II inhibitors in vivo. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 42:327–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van GM, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Trotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J, Gwede C, Corn B, Fu K, Gunderson L, McCormick B, Morrisintegral M, Rich T, Shipley W, Curran W (2000) Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. an improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:13–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tiseo M, Ardizzoni A (2007) Current status of second-line treatment and novel therapies for small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:764–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YH, Goto K, Yoh K, Niho S, Ohmatsu H, Kubota K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y (2008) Performance status and sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy are significant prognostic factors in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy. Cancer 113:2518–2523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundstrom S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, Aasebo U, Aamdal S (2005) Second-line chemotherapy in recurrent small cell lung cancer. Results from a crossover schedule after primary treatment with cisplatin and etoposide (EP-regimen) or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristin (CEV-regimen). Lung Cancer 48:251–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng S, Evans WK, Stys-Norman D, Shepherd FA (2007) Chemotherapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline. J Thorac Oncol 2:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Inoue A, Sugawara S, Yamazaki K, Maemondo M, Suzuki T, Gomi K, Takanashi S, Inoue C, Inage M, Yokouchi H, Watanabe H, Tsukamoto T, Saijo Y, Ishimoto O, Hommura F, Nukiwa T (2008) Randomized phase II trial comparing amrubicin with topotecan in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0402. J Clin Oncol 26:5401–5406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nogami N, Kiura K, Takigava N, Harita S, Chikamori K, Shibayama T, Tabata M, Hotta K, Shinkai T, Tanimoto M (2010) A phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with topotecan and amrubicin in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). J Clin Oncol 28:15s (Ref Type: Abstract)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by a research grant from the Cretan Association for Biomedical Research (CABR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassilis Georgoulias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xenidis, N., Vardakis, N., Varthalitis, I. et al. Α multicenter phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with irinotecan as second-line treatment of patients with refractory small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68, 63–68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1427-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1427-5

Keywords

Navigation