Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Topotecan and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Results of a multicenter NOGGO: phase I/II study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Second-line treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin enhances survival of women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). However, because of its cumulative neurotoxicity, there is a strong demand for platinum-combinations with better therapeutic index. Because of its pharmacological properties, topotecan is a good adjunct to carboplatin in this setting, but its safety and efficacy remains to be defined.

Methods

Patients with platinum-sensitive ROC were eligible in this multicenter phase I/II study, stratified according to treatment-free interval (TFI). Dose level 0 consisted of topotecan 1 mg/m2/d1–3/q21d plus carboplatin AUC5/d3/q21d. DLT was defined as grade ≥3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicity excluding alopecia, nausea and vomiting, accompanied by a treatment delay >1 week.

Results

From June 2004 to August 2005, 26 patients were enrolled, receiving a total of 145 cycles of chemotherapy. MTD was reached at topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC5. We observed a single grade 4 leucopenia. There were 3 (12%), 15 (58%) and 8 (31%) events of grade 3/4 hematological anaemia, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Response rate was 67% (95% CI 43–85), median progression-free survival 9.5 months (95% CI 7.3–12.0), median overall survival 19.4 months (95% CI 12.3–26.9). None of the toxicity or efficacy endpoints were associated with TFI.

Conclusion

Topotecan and carboplatin is a well tolerated novel doublet option for women with platinum sensitive ROC. We encourage further studies on this approach, but to limit the doses of topotecan to 0.75 mg/m2/d1–3 and carboplatin AUC 5/d3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. HECTOR; Hycamtin et carboplatin versus established regimens in the treatment of replapsed ovarian cancer.

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:106–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozols RF, Bookman MA, Connolly DC et al (2004) Focus on epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell 5:19–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Markmann M, Rothman R, Hakes T et al (1991) Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 9:389–393

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gore ME, Fryatt I, Wiltshaw E et al (1990) Treatment of relapsed carcinoma of the ovary with cisplatin or carboplatin following initial treatment with these compounds. Gynecol Oncol 36:207–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N et al (2003) Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet 361(9375):2099–2106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W et al (2003) A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1320–1329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pignata S, De Placido S, Biamonte R et al (2006) Residual neurotoxicity in ovarian cancer patients in clinical remission after first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel: The Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer (MITO-4) retrospective study. BMC Cancer 6:5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I et al (2006) Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol 24(29):4699–4707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrero JM, Weber B, Geay JF et al (2007) Second-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is highly effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in late relapse: a GINECO phase II trial. Ann Oncol 18(2):263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ten Bokkel Huinik WW,Gore M, Carmichael J et al (1997) Topotecan versus palictaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2183–2193

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon A, Carmichael J, Malfetano J et al (1998) Final analysis of a phase III randomized study of topotecan vs. paclitaxel in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. International Topotecan Study Group. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:356 Abstract 1374

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gore M, ten Bokkel Huinink W, Carmichael J et al (2001) Clinical evidence for topotecan-paclitaxel non–cross-resistance in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 19(7):1893–1900

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Von Hoff DD, Burris HA, Eckhardt J (1994) Preclinical and phase I trials of topoisomerase I inhibitors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 34(Suppl):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufmann SH, Peereboom D, Buckwalter CA et al (1996) Cytotoxic effects of topotecan combined with various anticancer agents in human cancer cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(11):734–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou T-C, Motzer, Tong Y et al (1994) Computer quantitation of synergism and antagonism of taxol, topotecan, and cisplatin against human teratocarcinoma cell growth. A rational approach to clinical protocol design. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1517–1524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng M-F, Chatterjee S, Berger NA (1994) Schedule-dependent cytotoxicity of topotecan alone and in combination chemotherapy regimes. Oncol Res 6:269–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vecchione F, Fruscio R, Dell’Anna T (2007) A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(2):367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Cancer Institute: Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc_v30.html

  19. International Union Against Cancer [UICC]. http://www.uicc.org

  20. Rustin GJS, Nelstrop AE, McClean P et al (1996) Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125. J Clin Oncol 14:1545–1551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE et al (2003) Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 21:3194–3200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K et al (2001) Neurotoxicity associated with a regimen of carboplatin (AUC 5–6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 h) employed in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127:55–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose PG, Smrekar M, Haba P et al (2005) A phase I/II trial of weekly topotecan and carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 99:714–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson AB, Calvert PM, Sludden JA et al (2002) Topotecan in combination with carboplatin: phase I trial evaluation of two treatment schedules. Ann Oncol 13:399–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. De Jonge MJ, Loos WJ, Gelderblom H et al (2000) Phase I pharmacologic study of oral topotecan and intravenous cisplatin: sequence-dependent hematologic side effects. J Clin Oncol 18:2104–2115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowman A, Rye T, Ross G et al (2001) Effective dosing of topotecan with carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer: a phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol 19(13):3255–3259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Markmann M, Kennedy A, Webster K et al (2000) Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 79:116–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bolis G, Scarfone G, Villa A et al (2001) A phase I/II study of topotecan in combination with carboplatin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 83:477–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown JV, Peters WA, Rettenmaier MA et al (2003) Three-consecutive-day topotecan is an active regimen for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 88(2):136–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bookman MA, McMeekin DS, Fracasso PM et al (2006) Sequence dependence of hematologic toxicity using carboplatin and topotecan for primary therapy of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 103:473–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thödtmann R, Kemmerich M, Depenbrock H et al (1998) A clinical phase I trial of topotecan in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. EORTC 1998; Abstract 263

  32. Scarfone G, Parazzini F, Sciatta C et al (2000) A phase I/II study of topotecan in combination with carboplatin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 11 Suppl. 4: Abstract 382P

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the nurses, study-coordinators and patients who participated in this trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jalid Sehouli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koensgen, D., Stengel, D., Belau, A. et al. Topotecan and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Results of a multicenter NOGGO: phase I/II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62, 393–400 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0617-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0617-2

Keywords

Navigation