Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer in a modified administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel: a phase II study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Our main objective was to investigate the response rate in pretreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received a weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel; our secondary objectives were to assess toxicity and survival. Methods: Topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 was combined with paclitaxel 70 mg/m2; these cytotoxic agents were administered once every week (day 1) for 3 consecutive weeks (one cycle), and repeated every 28 days (three infusions per cycle) for a minimum of three cycles. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled, 41 of whom were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median number of cycles was two (range 1–6). Eleven/forty-one (26.83%) patients responded: one complete response and ten partial responses; the median duration of response was 4 months (range 2–8 months); the median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 4.2–9.8). Myelotoxicity was the most common adverse reaction (grade 3 neutropenia in 19.5% of the patients and grade 4 in 7.32%). Non-hematologic toxicities varied from 2.44% to 9.76%. No patient had to stop treatment due to toxicity. Conclusion: Topotecan combined with paclitaxel, given on day 1 on a weekly basis, produced a response rate of 26.83% in pretreated patients with SCLC. Myelotoxicity, particularly neutropenia, was the main adverse reaction, but in a minority of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burris HA III, Hanauske AR, Jahnson RK et al. (1992) Activity of topotecan, a new topoisomerase I inhibitor, against human tumor colony-forming units in vitro. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1816–1821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P, et al. (1997) Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. J Clin Oncol 15:2090–2096

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Markman M (1997) Topotecan: an important new drug in the management of ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 4 (suppl 5):55–58

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bokkel Huinick WT, Gore M, Carmichael J. et al. (1997) Topotecan vs paclitaxel for the treatment or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2183–2187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giaccone G (1989) Second line chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 5:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stathopoulos GP, Rigatos SK, Christodoulou Ch. et al. (2004) Weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel in pretreated advanced cancer patients: a phase I/II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 54:259–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nabholtz JM, Gelmon K, Bontenbal M, et al. (1996) Multicenter randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:1858–1867

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staqnet M (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. 47:207–214

  9. Murren J, Glatstein E, Pass PI (2001) Small cell lung cancer. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer of the lung. Cancer principles and practice of oncology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 983–1018

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clark PI, Slevin ML, Joel SP, et al. (1994) A randomized trial of two etoposide schedules in small-cell lung cancer: the influence of pharmacokinetics on efficacy and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 12:1427–1432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith IE, Harland SJ, Robinson BA et al. (1985) Carboplatin: a very active new cisplatin analog in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 69:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans WK, Feld R, Osoba D, et al. (1984) VP-16 alone and in combination with cisplatin in previously treated patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer 53:1461–1465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, et al. (1985) VP-16 and cisplatin as a first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 3:1471–1475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH et al. (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:282–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ettinger DS, Finkelstein DM, Abeloff MD, et al. (1990) A randomized comparison of standard chemotherapy versus alternating chemotherapy and maintenance versus no maintenance therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 8:230–235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arriagada R, Le Chevallier T, Pignon JP et al (1993) Initial chemotherapeutic doses and survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 329:1848–1853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pujol JL, Donillard JY, Riviere A, et al. (1997) Dose-intensity of a four-drug chemotherapy regimen with or without recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 15:2082–2089

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thatcher N, Girling DJ, Hopwood P, et al. (2000) Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small- cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. J Clin Oncol 18:395–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hryniuk W, Bush H. (1984) The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2: 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  20. Souhami RL, Rudd R, Ruiz de Elvira MC, et al. (1994) Randomized trial comparing weekly versus 3-week chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial. J Clin Oncol 12:1806–1813

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murray N, Shah A, Osoba D, et al. (1991) Intensive weekly chemotherapy for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 9:1632–1637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray N, Livingston R, Shepherd F, et al. (1997) Randomized study of CODE versus alternating CAV/EP for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an intergroup study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Southwest Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 17: 2300–2308

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frasci G, Nicollela G, Comella P, et al. (2001) A weekly regimen of cisplatin, paclitaxel and Topotecan with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer 84:1166–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Klaassen V, Wilke H, Strumberg D, et al. (1996). Phase I study with a weekly 1-h infusion of paclitaxel in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A:547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seidman AD, Hudis CA, Albanel J. et al. (1998). Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-h paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chank RS, Fracasso PM, Picus J. (1999). A phase I study of weekly topotecan as a bolus infusion [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:207a

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rowinsky EK. (2002) Weekly topotecan: an alternative to topotecan’s standard daily×5 schedule? Oncologist 7:324–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schiller JH, Adak S, Cella D, et al. (2001) Topotecan vs observation after cisplatin plus etoposide in extensive stage SCLC: E7593—a phase III trial of the Eastern Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 19:2114–2122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. P. Stathopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stathopoulos, G.P., Christodoulou, C., Stathopoulos, J. et al. Second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer in a modified administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel: a phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57, 796–800 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0085-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0085-5

Keywords

Navigation